Course coordinator
Dr Severine van Bommel
Consultation is by appointment. Please email me to make an appointment.
Course overview
- Study period
- Semester 2, 2024 (22/07/2024 - 18/11/2024)
- Study level
- Undergraduate
- Location
- Gatton
- Attendance mode
- In Person
- Units
- 2
- Administrative campus
- Gatton
- Coordinating unit
- Agriculture and Food Sustainability School
This course explores the complex but fascinating interactions that occur between humans and wildlife species and how these relationships can be better managed to ensure coexistence. Using local, national and international case studies of human wildlife conflicts, students will develop an in-depth knowledge of both the ecological and sociological issues underpinning the conflict. Through a series of lectures and workshops students will also be given knowledge and skill sets that allow them to not only equitability assess both sides of human wildlife conflicts but help them construct and deliver management plans and facilitate conflict resolutions. Topics to be covered include the diverse perspectives from which wildlife is viewed in different societies, the role of policy and legislation in the protection of wildlife, specific urban, regional and rural examples of human wildlife conflict, zoonoses, wildlife utilisation and feral pest management.
Management of human-wildlife interactions is considered to be one of the most challenging tasks for wildlife management practitioners around the world.ﾠHuman-wildlife conflicts and resource competition imply costs on human social, economic or cultural life and on the ecological, social or cultural life of wildlife concerned, often to the detriment of conservation objectives and socio-economic realities.ﾠDuring this course, participants will learn about the human-wildlife interactions in regional, national and international settings, how these conflicts are managed, and how ideal conflict management strategies can be developed.
Like all real-world problems, addressing human-wildlife interactions requiresﾠtransdisciplinaryﾠthinking and combining knowledge in new and interesting ways.ﾠWe will exploreﾠtheoretical frameworks for approaching human-wildlife interactionsﾠthat go beyondﾠdisciplinary boundaries and provide a more holistic approachﾠtoﾠbetter equip conservationists and other professionals in dealing with the issue.ﾠDr. van Bommel blends scientific evidence of several academic disciplines (e.g., ecology, wildlife management, sociology, policy sciences, economics) and 20 years of real-world experience to help participants develop a deep understanding of human-wildlife interactions and will equip them with the practical skills necessary to develop human-wildlife conflict management strategies.
Using a variety of teaching and learning methods, students will learn about issues involved in determining and analysing human-wildlife interactions, and planning, implementing and evaluating conflict mitigation or prevention schemes.ﾠWhile the course covers theoretical components, it takes a very practical and pragmatic approach to management of human-wildlife interactions.
Course structure:
The course consists of the following modules:
Module 1. Analyzing HWIs
Module 2. Voluntary tools
Module 3.ﾠInformational tools
Module 4.ﾠFinancial tools
Module 5.ﾠRegulatory tools
Module 6.ﾠEvaluation of HWIsﾠ
Course requirements
Assumed background
A background in Wildlife Science, Zoology or some understanding of wild (native or exotic) animal biology or management is strongly desirable.ﾠ
Recommended prerequisites
We recommend completing the following courses before enrolling in this one:
ANIM1026
Incompatible
You can't enrol in this course if you've already completed the following:
ANIM7023 (co-taught)
Jointly taught details
This course is jointly-taught with:
This course will be co-taught with ANIM7023 but assessment items will be different in content. This shares modes with ANIM2033 In Person and External.
Course contact
Course staff
Lecturer
Dr Severine van Bommel
Timetable
The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.
Additional timetable information
Please note that the order of the Modules may vary based on the availability of guest speakers.ﾠYou will be informed of the dates and times of actual lectures, tutorials and practicals via blackboard.
While attendance at guest lectures is not mandatory, it is highly encouraged. These sessions offer unique insights and real-world perspectives that are invaluable to your learning and understanding of the course material. Guest lectures are an opportunity to engage with experts and professionals who bring a wealth of knowledge and experience that can significantly enhance your grasp of complex topics.
Benefits of Attending Guest Lectures:
- Networking Opportunities: Connecting with established professionals can open doors to internships, research opportunities, and potential career prospects.
- Enhanced Learning: Guest speakers often present case studies and real-world applications of theories that provide a deeper understanding of the subject matter.
We understand that schedules can be challenging, but making an effort to attend these lectures can significantly enrich your academic experience. It also shows respect and appreciation for the experts who take the time to share their knowledge with us.
Aims and outcomes
The course aims to develop participant knowledge, understanding and skills to:
1) critically engage with theoretical questions and practical challenges posed by human-wildlife conflicts (HWIs).
2) understand, construct and deliver human-wildlife interaction management plans in many contexts and facilitate resolution.
Learning outcomes
After successfully completing this course you should be able to:
LO1.
Apply Conflict Management Strategies in HWIs: Understand the three levels of conflict and the different conflict management processes, and apply this knowledge to develop practical strategies for managing human-wildlife conflicts effectively.
LO2.
Apply Stakeholder Engagement Strategies in HWIs: Understand the systemic properties of human-wildlife interactions, and apply this knowledge to engage effectively with various stakeholders to move conflicts towards coexistence.
LO3.
Apply Knowledge in HWIs: Understand the role of different types of knowledge in human-wildlife interactions, apply this understanding to identify the politicization of knowledge, and recognize how the involvement of experts and their expertise can influence conflict dynamics.
LO4.
Apply Financial Incentives for Conservation: Understand the role of financial incentives in managing human-wildlife interactions on private land and apply this knowledge to evaluate different economic tools, such as wildlife utilisation and market-based conservation efforts, to support sustainable land management practices.
LO5.
Apply Policy Frameworks in Human-Wildlife Conflict Management: Understand the role of policy in managing human-wildlife conflicts, and apply this knowledge to evaluate different policy instruments and their effectiveness in mitigating conflicts between humans and wildlife.
LO6.
Apply Evaluation Techniques in Human-Wildlife Interaction Management: Understand the role of evaluation in managing human-wildlife interactions, and apply this knowledge to develop and use evaluation questions, indicators, and data collection methods to assess the effectiveness of management strategies.
LO7.
Integrate knowledge: Integrate knowledge from ecological, social, and economic disciplines to develop comprehensive management strategies that are ethical, sustainable, and effective at multiple levels of human-wildlife conflict.
Assessment
Assessment summary
| Category | Assessment task | Weight | Due date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Role play/ Simulation | Debate - Grand Opening of Lion’s Gate Zoo/Rescue Centre and Visitors Centre | 15% |
16/08/2024 2:00 pm |
| Presentation | Sequential Assessment - Problem-based learning 1 | 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment. |
22/08/2024 5:00 pm |
| Presentation | Sequential Assessment - Problem-based learning 2 | 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment. |
13/09/2024 5:00 pm |
| Presentation | Sequential Problem-based learning 3 | 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment. |
19/09/2024 5:00 pm |
| Presentation | Sequential Problem-based learning 4 | 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment. |
18/10/2024 2:00 pm |
| Paper/ Report/ Annotation | Basic Human-Wildlife Conflict Management Plan | 25% |
25/10/2024 2:00 pm |
| Examination |
End of Semester Exam
|
40% |
End of Semester Exam Period 2/11/2024 - 16/11/2024 |
Assessment details
Debate - Grand Opening of Lion’s Gate Zoo/Rescue Centre and Visitors Centre
- Mode
- Activity/ Performance, Written
- Category
- Role play/ Simulation
- Weight
- 15%
- Due date
16/08/2024 2:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L01
Task description
Objective:
To simulate a town hall meeting for the grand opening of the Lion’s Gate Zoo/Rescue Centre, focusing on basic stakeholder perspectives and conflict management.
Overview:
Students will assume roles of different stakeholders affected by the zoo/rescue centre's opening. The exercise aims to introduce students to stakeholder engagement and basic conflict resolution strategies.
Activities:
Activity 1: Pre-Meeting Preparation
- Students will be assigned roles such as local government officials, conservationists, local business owners, and community members.
- Meet with your stakeholder group.
Discuss the potential impacts of the facility on the local community and environment.
Create a spider map that details your group’s major concerns, values and objectives (see page 1-4 of the role play instructions on blackboard). The spider map will not be assessed, but can be added as an appendix to the position statement (optional)
Prepare for the meeting. As a group, answer the questions on page 6 of the role play instructions (on blackboard). The answers to these questions are not assessed but the group discussion will help you prepare your position statement.
- Individually
- Prepare a concise position statement outlining their stakeholder’s perspective on the zoo's opening. This will be submitted individually and will be assessed.
Activity 2: Participation in Townhall Meeting:
- Each stakeholder group presents their position in a 3-minute speech. Each stakeholder group will allocate a spokesperson for this.
- Engage in a structured discussion, with each student responding to at least two other stakeholders’ positions.
Activity 3: Reflection Report:
Individually
- Write a reflection report discussing the insights gained from the role-play about human-wildlife conflict and stakeholder engagement.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of different arguments and strategies presented during the meeting.
- Use the questions on page 8 of the role play instructions to guide you (see blackboard).
Deliverables (individually)
- A position statement (500 words)
- A reflection report (1000 words)
The position statement and the reflection report are due on Friday week 4 at 2:00PM.
The role play will take place during the workshop in week 3 from 2PM-3:30PM. This scheduling applies to all students, including both internal and external participants.
Attendance Requirement: Like an exam, the role play is a crucial component of your assessment and require either in-person attendance or participation online.
Rescheduling Due to Conflicts: If you have prior commitments, such as work obligations, that might conflict with your scheduled role play time, it is your responsibility to arrange for these commitments to be rescheduled. The role play must take priority as it is integral to your assessment in this class.
Planning Ahead: Please review your schedules now to ensure availability during your assigned role play time slot. If you foresee any conflicts, make arrangements as soon as possible to avoid any issues.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
PLEASE NOTE: This is a mandatory component of the course, and your proactive planning and attendance are essential for successful completion. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding.
Submission guidelines
This item is submitted during the relevant in-class workshop for both In Person and Externals.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
Sequential Assessment - Problem-based learning 1
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Presentation
- Weight
- 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment.
- Due date
22/08/2024 5:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L02
Task description
Objective:
Leverage insights from guest speaker to enhance the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) experience, focusing on the development of innovative solutions to human-wildlife conflicts through collaborative and critical thinking.
Overview:
This assessment incorporates presentations from guest speaker 1, which will serve as the foundation for the scheduled PBL workshop. The workshop will center around the themes introduced by the speaker, challenging students to apply theoretical knowledge to practical, real-world problems. This format is designed to foster deeper understanding and engagement with the subject matter.
Workshop Structure:
- During the Workshop:
- Introduction (10 minutes): Brief recap of the guest speaker's presentation to align the focus of the workshop.
- Group Discussion (30 minutes): In groups of three to six, students will discuss the presentation and literature, identifying key issues and possible solutions to the human-wildlife conflicts presented.
- Solution Development (15 minutes): Groups will develop a recommended course of action, drawing on the insights gained from the discussion.
- Presentation (5 minutes per group): One student from each group will present their group's findings and proposed solutions to the class.
Deliverables:
- From each group: one jointly produced piece of butchers' paper
No show
If you are unable to attend the workshops, then you will be required to submit a written report of 500 words for each PBL case. This needs to be submitted within 7 days after the workshop.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
Submitted in class at the relevant workshop.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
Sequential Assessment - Problem-based learning 2
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Presentation
- Weight
- 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment.
- Due date
13/09/2024 5:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L03
Task description
Objective:
Leverage insights from guest speaker to enhance the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) experience, focusing on the development of innovative solutions to human-wildlife conflicts through collaborative and critical thinking.
Overview:
This assessment incorporates presentations from guest speaker 2, which will serve as the foundation for the scheduled PBL workshop. The workshop will center around the themes introduced by the speaker, challenging students to apply theoretical knowledge to practical, real-world problems. This format is designed to foster deeper understanding and engagement with the subject matter.
Workshop Structure:
- During the Workshop:
- Introduction (10 minutes): Brief recap of the guest speaker's presentation to align the focus of the workshop.
- Group Discussion (30 minutes): In groups of three to six, students will discuss the presentation and literature, identifying key issues and possible solutions to the human-wildlife conflicts presented.
- Solution Development (15 minutes): Groups will develop a recommended course of action, drawing on the insights gained from the discussion.
- Presentation (5 minutes per group): One student from each group will present their group's findings and proposed solutions to the class.
Deliverables:
- From each group: one jointly produced piece of butchers' paper
Submission:
- Written Report Requirement: Students must submit a 500-word report analyzing the guest speaker’s presentation using the class concepts, theories, and frameworks. This report should propose solutions to the case presented.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
This assessment is submitted on Blackboard via Turnitin. You should also retain an electronic copy of every piece of assessment you submit. Legal Declaration By submitting your work via this website, you formally declare that (1) it is your own original work, and no part of the work has been copied from any other source or person except where due acknowledgement is made; (2) no part of the work has been previously submitted for assessment in this or any other institution; and (3) you have read the UQ Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy (http://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.60.04-student-integrity-and-misconduct) and understand its implications.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
Sequential Problem-based learning 3
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Presentation
- Weight
- 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment.
- Due date
19/09/2024 5:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L04
Task description
Objective:
Leverage insights from guest speaker to enhance the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) experience, focusing on the development of innovative solutions to human-wildlife conflicts through collaborative and critical thinking.
Overview:
This assessment incorporates presentations from guest speaker 3, which will serve as the foundation for the scheduled PBL workshop. The workshop will center around the themes introduced by the speaker, challenging students to apply theoretical knowledge to practical, real-world problems. This format is designed to foster deeper understanding and engagement with the subject matter.
Workshop Structure:
- During the Workshop:
- Introduction (10 minutes): Brief recap of the guest speaker's presentation to align the focus of the workshop.
- Group Discussion (30 minutes): In groups of three to six, students will discuss the presentation and literature, identifying key issues and possible solutions to the human-wildlife conflicts presented.
- Solution Development (15 minutes): Groups will develop a recommended course of action, drawing on the insights gained from the discussion.
- Presentation (5 minutes per group): One student from each group will present their group's findings and proposed solutions to the class.
Deliverables:
- From each group: one jointly produced piece of butchers' paper
Submission:
Submit a written report following the workshop of 500 words for each PBL case.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
This assessment is submitted on Blackboard via Turnitin. You should also retain an electronic copy of every piece of assessment you submit. Legal Declaration By submitting your work via this website, you formally declare that (1) it is your own original work, and no part of the work has been copied from any other source or person except where due acknowledgement is made; (2) no part of the work has been previously submitted for assessment in this or any other institution; and (3) you have read the UQ Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy (http://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.60.04-student-integrity-and-misconduct) and understand its implications.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
Sequential Problem-based learning 4
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Presentation
- Weight
- 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment.
- Due date
18/10/2024 2:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L05
Task description
Objective:
Leverage insights from guest speaker to enhance the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) experience, focusing on the development of innovative solutions to human-wildlife conflicts through collaborative and critical thinking.
Overview:
This assessment incorporates presentations from guest speaker 4, which will serve as the foundation for the scheduled PBL workshop. The workshop will center around the themes introduced by the speaker, challenging students to apply theoretical knowledge to practical, real-world problems. This format is designed to foster deeper understanding and engagement with the subject matter.
Workshop Structure:
- During the Workshop:
- Introduction (10 minutes): Brief recap of the guest speaker's presentation to align the focus of the workshop.
- Group Discussion (30 minutes): In groups of three to six, students will discuss the presentation and literature, identifying key issues and possible solutions to the human-wildlife conflicts presented.
- Solution Development (15 minutes): Groups will develop a recommended course of action, drawing on the insights gained from the discussion.
- Presentation (5 minutes per group): One student from each group will present their group's findings and proposed solutions to the class.
Deliverables:
- From each group: one jointly produced piece of butchers' paper
Submission:
Submit a written report following the workshop of 500 words for each PBL case.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
This assessment is submitted on Blackboard via Turnitin. You should also retain an electronic copy of every piece of assessment you submit. Legal Declaration By submitting your work via this website, you formally declare that (1) it is your own original work, and no part of the work has been copied from any other source or person except where due acknowledgement is made; (2) no part of the work has been previously submitted for assessment in this or any other institution; and (3) you have read the UQ Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy (http://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.60.04-student-integrity-and-misconduct) and understand its implications.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
Basic Human-Wildlife Conflict Management Plan
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Paper/ Report/ Annotation
- Weight
- 25%
- Due date
25/10/2024 2:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L07
Task description
Objective: Create a basic management plan for a chosen human-wildlife conflict scenario, applying key principles from the IUCN "Good Practice Checklist." (see IUCN SSC guidelines on human-wildlife conflict and coexistence : first edition | IUCN Library System). The IUCN Good Practice Checklist is a tool designed to guide conservation practitioners, researchers, and students in evaluating, planning, and implementing human-wildlife conflict management strategies. It consists of key questions that are structured around foundational principles critical to conflict resolution and coexistence strategies.
Instructions:
Select a Conflict: Choose a real-world human-wildlife conflict. Briefly describe the involved species, affected human communities, and the geographical context.
Good Practice Checklist Application:
- Identify Conflict Levels: Assess and categorize the conflict level using simple criteria.
- Ethical Considerations: Discuss potential ethical issues and the roles of primary stakeholders.
- Ecological and Social Contexts: Provide a general overview of the natural behaviors of the involved wildlife and basic social factors affecting the conflict.
- Stakeholder Engagement: Suggest methods for involving key stakeholders in resolving the conflict.
- Basic Planning and Actions: Propose straightforward, actionable steps for conflict management based on class discussions and readings.
Management Plan Components:
- Preventative and Mitigation Strategies: Outline basic strategies to prevent and mitigate wildlife damage.
- Simple Monitoring and Evaluation: Describe how the plan’s effectiveness could be checked through simple measures.
Report and Presentation: Prepare a short report and a presentation that summarizes the management plan, focusing on the application of the good practice checklist.
General Instructions:
Familiarization: Begin by thoroughly reading the Good Practice Checklist available in the IUCN guidelines. Understand the intent and focus of each question within the checklist.
Application to the Conflict Scenario:
- For each relevant section of the checklist, clearly articulate how it applies to your selected conflict scenario.
- Provide specific examples where applicable to illustrate how the checklist guides the decisions and strategies in your management plan.
Integration:
- Integrate responses to the checklist into your overall management plan, using them to structure the report.
- Ensure that each part of the checklist is addressed in relation to the conflict scenario, emphasizing how it informs your proposed strategies.
Reflection:
- Reflect on the checklist’s role in shaping your approach to human-wildlife conflict.
- Discuss any limitations or additional considerations that might extend beyond the checklist’s scope.
Simplicity and Clarity:
- Focus on applying the checklist to ensure that all basic aspects of conflict management are covered. Use the checklist to structure your report, addressing each point in a clear and concise manner.
Deliverable:
- Basic conflict management report
Submission format:
- Word Limit: Your report should not exceed 2500 words. Each section of the checklist should be addressed succinctly, providing just enough detail to show understanding and application without extensive depth.
- Report Structure: Organize your report to follow the structure of the checklist, with each section of your management plan corresponding to checklist items.
- Visual Aids: Include tables, figures, or charts that help illustrate how checklist items are applied within your management plan.
- References: Cite all sources appropriately, including any direct references to the IUCN guidelines and the checklist. Use the APA referencing style.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
You must submit your Assessment task, in Blackboard, via the Conflict management report link by the submission deadline. You should also retain an electronic copy of every piece of assessment you submit. Legal Declaration By submitting your work via this website, you formally declare that (1) it is your own original work, and no part of the work has been copied from any other source or person except where due acknowledgement is made; (2) no part of the work has been previously submitted for assessment in this or any other institution; and (3) you have read the UQ Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy (http://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.60.04-student-integrity-and-misconduct) and understand its implications.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
End of Semester Exam
- In-person
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Examination
- Weight
- 40%
- Due date
End of Semester Exam Period
2/11/2024 - 16/11/2024
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07
Task description
Format: The exam will consist of structured short essay questions designed to evaluate a foundational understanding of the course content. This format encourages students to demonstrate their knowledge and ability to apply learning to simpler scenarios.
Content: The exam will cover key concepts from all six modules:
- Module 1: Basics of analyzing human-wildlife interactions.
- Module 2-5: Introduction to informational, regulatory, financial, and voluntary tools.
- Module 6: Basic principles of evaluating human-wildlife interactions.
Expectations: Students are expected to illustrate their understanding of course materials through direct application of concepts learned in class. The exam questions will focus on defining and explaining theories and tools discussed in the modules, with a lesser emphasis on complex synthesis or extensive critical analysis.
Duration: The exam will be 2 hours, allowing enough time for students to provide clear and concise answers.
Preparation: Students should review lecture slides, assigned readings, and participate in discussion forums to reinforce their understanding. Focusing on case studies and examples discussed in class will be helpful.
Assessment Criteria: Answers will be assessed based on understanding and application of basic concepts, clarity of expression, and accuracy in addressing the questions. Proper referencing of theories, concepts and frameworks (e.g. "According to Madden and McQuin's 'levels of conflict' framework, ......") and the ability to independently articulate course content will also be evaluated.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Exam details
| Planning time | 10 minutes |
|---|---|
| Duration | 120 minutes |
| Calculator options | Any calculator permitted |
| Open/closed book | Closed Book examination - no written materials permitted |
| Exam platform | Paper based |
| Invigilation | Invigilated in person |
Submission guidelines
Deferral or extension
You may be able to defer this exam.
Course grading
Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.
| Grade | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 (Low Fail) |
Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: 0% - 34% |
| 2 (Fail) |
Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: 35% -46% |
| 3 (Marginal Fail) |
Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes Course grade description: A cumulative score of 47% - 49% for all assessment items. OR A cumulative score of 50% or greater for all assessment items AND less than a passing mark in the final exam |
| 4 (Pass) |
Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: A cumulative score of 50% - 64% for all assessment items |
| 5 (Credit) |
Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: A cumulative score of 65% - 74% for all assessment items |
| 6 (Distinction) |
Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: A cumulative score of 75% - 84% for all assessment items |
| 7 (High Distinction) |
Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: A cumulative score of 85% - 100% for all assessment items |
Additional course grading information
Course Grading Rules and Assessment Hurdles
You must achieve a cumulative score of at least 50% for all assessment items ANDﾠa passing mark on the final exam.
If a student obtains an overall percentage greater than the cut-offs set to achieve a 4 or higher for the course based on marks from a combination of progressive assessment and examinations and the student does NOT score 50% in the final take home assessment, they are unable to achieve a grade higher than a 3 (failing grade) for the course.
Additional Information
You must address any additional assessment requirements identified in this eCP.
Supplementary assessment
Supplementary assessment is available for this course.
Additional assessment information
Please note the following when writing assignments
You must not re-use past work from previous assessments in your assignments.
Turnitinﾠ
Assignments that are required to be submitted through TurnItIn, mustﾠonlyﾠbe uploaded to the assessment specific Turnitin link on the relevant course Blackboard site.ﾠ If you submit any version of your assessment item to any alternative Turnitin link, this is considered cheating and you will be held liable for this action.ﾠ
Academic Integrity and Plagiarism
All reported work must be done by the individual student. Assignments that look and sound alike will be reported as plagiarism – a serious offence at UQ. Please note the university’s policy on academic integrity and plagiarism which can be accessed atﾠhttp://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.60.04-student-integrity-and-misconduct
Release of marks
Unless specifically indicated by the lecturer involved,ﾠevery attempt will be made to haveﾠthe results for progressive assessment tasks available within 3 weeks of submission. For items of assessment submitted in the last 2 weeks of the semester, the results will be available before the day of your end of semester examination in the course, unless otherwise indicated by the Course Coordinator. Results and feedback availability will be advised to you by email or announced via the course Blackboard site.ﾠ
Re-mark Applications – refer to theﾠUniversity's Re-mark Policyﾠto check your eligibility
Before applying for a remark, students should consider the following:
- You have consulted the course coordinator for feedback
- Your academic grounds for remark have been discussed and are valid
- Wanting a higher grade is not grounds for a remark. A remark can decrease your grade.
Remark applicationsﾠwill notﾠbe considered without first having contacted your course Co-ordinator.
Deferred and Supplementary assessment (including Deferred Mid-Semester Examinations)
Deferred and Supplementary information can be located on the my.UQ website
Learning resources
You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.
Library resources
Find the required and recommended resources for this course on the UQ Library website.
Other course materials
Recommended
| Item | Description | Further Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| ANIM2033 Course Profile | provides details of specifications, rationale, aims and structure of the course. It also informs you of the assessment for this course, including weightings and due dates. | |
| ANIM2033 Course Blackboard site | Blackboard is the main method of communication for this course. https://learn.uq.edu.au/ |
Additional learning resources information
Further readingsﾠ- We strongly encourage you to read widely, relying on refereed sources (journal articles, books). Some references to key readings will be suggested on Blackboard.
Please note: This course ANIM2033ﾠis co-taught with ANIM7023, these courses share a Blackboard site.
Learning activities
The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.
Filter activity type by
Please select
| Learning period | Activity type | Topic |
|---|---|---|
Multiple weeks From Week 1 To Week 3 |
Workshop |
Module 1 - HWI in contemporary society (intro) HWI in contemporary society, planning for co-existence, levels of conflict. Learning outcomes: L01 |
Multiple weeks From Week 4 To Week 5 |
Workshop |
Module 2 - Voluntary tools Stakeholders, perceptions, values and behaviour change. Learning outcomes: L02 |
Multiple weeks From Week 6 To Week 7 |
Workshop |
Module 3 - Informational tools The role of scientific knowledge and traditional knowledge in conflict management Learning outcomes: L03 |
Multiple weeks From Week 8 To Week 9 |
Workshop |
Module 4 - Financial tools Financial and economic incentives to increase tolerance and co-existence Learning outcomes: L04 |
Mid Sem break (23 Sep - 29 Sep) |
Not Timetabled |
In-Semester break (Reading) Use this time to catch up on reading and completion of assignments. |
Multiple weeks From Week 10 To Week 11 |
Workshop |
Module 5 - Regulatory tools Policy factors, governance and institutions Learning outcomes: L05 |
Multiple weeks From Week 12 To Week 13 |
Workshop |
Module 6 - Evaluation evaluation of management of HWI, recap, exam training Learning outcomes: L06, L07 |
Policies and procedures
University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:
- Student Code of Conduct Policy
- Student Integrity and Misconduct Policy and Procedure
- Assessment Procedure
- Examinations Procedure
- Reasonable Adjustments - Students Policy and Procedure
Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.