Course coordinator
Associate Professor Severine van Bommel
Consultation is by appointment. Please email me to make an appointment.
Course overview
- Study period
- Semester 2, 2024 (22/07/2024 - 18/11/2024)
- Study level
- Postgraduate Coursework
- Location
- External
- Attendance mode
- Online
- Units
- 2
- Administrative campus
- Gatton
- Coordinating unit
- Agriculture and Food Sustainability School
Increases in populations of humans have led to increases in human-wildlife conflicts. `Human wildlife conflict management' is now used to describe any negative interactions between humans and wildlife. These interactions can be real or perceived, economic or aesthetic, social or political, and may encompass damages to the individual that result from wildlife legislation, regulations, or policies that are designed to protect or conserve wildlife, public benefits, and individual property rights. This course is about understanding the causes of and resolutions to human wildlife conflicts.
Management of human-wildlife interactions is considered to be one of the most challenging tasks for wildlife management practitioners around the world.ﾠHuman-wildlife conflicts and resource competition imply costs on human social, economic or cultural life and on the ecological, social or cultural life of wildlife concerned, often to the detriment of conservation objectives and socio-economic realities.ﾠDuring this course, participants will learn about the human-wildlife interactions in regional, national and international settings, how these conflicts are managed, and how ideal conflict management strategies can be developed.
Like all real-world problems, addressing human-wildlife interactions requiresﾠtransdisciplinaryﾠthinking and combining knowledge in new and interesting ways.ﾠWe will exploreﾠtheoretical frameworks for approaching human wildlife interactionsﾠthat go beyondﾠdisciplinary boundaries and provide a more holistic approachﾠtoﾠbetter equip conservationists and other professionals in dealing with the issue.ﾠDr. van Bommel blends scientific evidence of several academic disciplines (e.g., ecology, wildlife management, sociology, policy sciences, economics) and 20 years of real-world experience to help participants develop a deep understanding of human-wildlife interactions and will equip them with the practical skills necessary to develop human-wildlife conflict management strategies.
Using a variety of teaching and learning methods, students will learn about issues involved in determining and analysing human-wildlife interactions, and planning, implementing and evaluating conflict mitigation or prevention schemes.ﾠWhile the course covers theoretical components, it takes a very practical and pragmatic approach to management of human-wildlife interactions.
Course structure:
The course consists of the following modules:
Module 1. Analyzing HWIs
Module 2. Voluntary tools
Module 3.ﾠInformational tools
Module 4.ﾠFinancial tools
Module 5.ﾠRegulatory tools
Module 6.ﾠEvaluation of HWIsﾠ
ﾠ
Course requirements
Assumed background
A background in Wildlife Science, Zoology or some understanding of wild (native or exotic) animal biology or management is strongly desirable.ﾠ
Incompatible
You can't enrol in this course if you've already completed the following:
ANIM2033 (co-taught)
Course contact
Course staff
Lecturer
Associate Professor Severine van Bommel
Timetable
Additional timetable information
Please note that there will not be lectures, tutorials and practicals each week.ﾠYou will be informed of the dates and times of actual lectures, tutorials and practicals. These actual lectures, tutorials and practicals will be compulsory as they may involve guest speakers, open discussions about course content or fieldtrips to sites experiencing human-wildlife conflict.
This course will be co-taught with ANIM2033ﾠbut assessment items will be different in content.
Aims and outcomes
The course aims to develop participant knowledge, understanding and skills to:
1) critically engage with theoretical questions and practical challenges posed by human-wildlife conflicts (HWIs).
2) understand, construct and deliver human-wildlife interaction management plans in many contexts and facilitate resolution.
Learning outcomes
After successfully completing this course you should be able to:
LO1.
Analyze, Evaluate, and Create Conflict Management Strategies in HWIs: Analyze the three levels of conflict and the corresponding management processes, critically evaluate existing strategies, and create innovative solutions for complex human-wildlife conflicts, integrating multidisciplinary approaches and stakeholder perspectives.
LO2.
Analyze, Evaluate, and Create Stakeholder Engagement Strategies in HWIs: Analyze the systemic properties of human-wildlife interactions and the different conflict levels, critically evaluate existing engagement strategies, and create innovative, integrative solutions to foster coexistence through effective stakeholder engagement and negotiation processes.
LO3.
Evaluate and Synthesize Knowledge in HWIs: Critically evaluate the role of various types of knowledge in human-wildlife interactions, synthesize insights to understand the politicization of knowledge, and create strategies that leverage expert involvement to manage and mitigate conflicts effectively.
LO4.
Analyze, Evaluate, and Create Financial Incentive Strategies for Conservation: Analyze the effectiveness of various financial incentives in promoting management of human-wildlife interactions on private land, critically evaluate existing economic tools and policies, and create innovative strategies to enhance the economic viability of conservation efforts while ensuring ecological and social sustainability.
LO5.
Analyze, Evaluate, and Create Policy Frameworks in Human-Wildlife Conflict Management: Analyze the effectiveness of various policy instruments in managing human-wildlife conflicts, critically evaluate existing policies and their implementation, and create innovative policy recommendations to enhance the coexistence of humans and wildlife while ensuring ecological sustainability.
LO6.
Analyze, Evaluate, and Create Evaluation Frameworks for Human-Wildlife Interaction Management: Analyze the effectiveness of various evaluation techniques in human-wildlife interaction management, critically evaluate existing evaluation frameworks, and create innovative evaluation plans that include comprehensive indicators, data collection methods, and analysis techniques to enhance the effectiveness of management strategies.
LO7.
Integrate and appraise advanced multidisciplinary knowledge: Develop and lead sophisticated management strategies that integrate ecological, social, and economic disciplines, ensuring ethical, sustainable, and effective solutions to complex human-wildlife conflicts.
Assessment
Assessment summary
| Category | Assessment task | Weight | Due date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Role play/ Simulation | Debate - Grand Opening of Lion’s Gate Zoo/Rescue Centre and Visitors Centre | 15% |
16/08/2024 2:00 pm |
| Presentation | Sequential Assessment Problem-based learning 1 | 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment. |
22/08/2024 5:00 pm |
| Presentation | Sequential Assessment Problem-based learning 2 | 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment |
13/09/2024 5:00 pm |
| Presentation | Sequential Assessment Problem-based learning 3 | 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment |
19/09/2024 5:00 pm |
| Presentation | Sequential Assessment Problem-based learning 4 | 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment. |
18/10/2024 5:00 pm |
| Paper/ Report/ Annotation | Conflict management plan | 35% |
25/10/2024 2:00 pm |
| Examination |
Exam
|
30% |
End of Semester Exam Period 2/11/2024 - 16/11/2024 |
A hurdle is an assessment requirement that must be satisfied in order to receive a specific grade for the course. Check the assessment details for more information about hurdle requirements.
Assessment details
Debate - Grand Opening of Lion’s Gate Zoo/Rescue Centre and Visitors Centre
- Mode
- Activity/ Performance, Written
- Category
- Role play/ Simulation
- Weight
- 15%
- Due date
16/08/2024 2:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L01
Task description
Objective:
To engage in a complex stakeholder simulation involving detailed conflict resolution and negotiation strategies at the town hall meeting for the zoo/rescue centre's opening.
Overview:
Students will take on detailed roles with more complex backgrounds and are expected to demonstrate advanced understanding of negotiation and conflict resolution.
Activities:
Activity 1: Pre-Meeting Preparation
Meet with your stakeholder group
- You will be assigned leadership roles such as meeting moderator, Key Decision-Maker (e.g., local government official or Conservation Authority), expert advisor, or conflict resolution expert.
- Use academic and industry resources to research real-world cases similar to your role and use relevant data and strategies to develop your views on the zoo/rescue center’s impact on the community and wildlife.
- Create a spider map that details your group’s major concerns, values and objectives (see page 1-4 of the role play instructions on blackboard). The spider map will not be assessed, but can be added as an appendix to the position statement (optional)
- Prepare for the meeting. As a group, answer the questions on page 6 of the role play instructions (on blackboard). The answers to these questions are not assessed but the group discussion will help you prepare your position statement.
Individually
- Each student, individually develops a comprehensive position paper (500 words) detailing your stakeholder’s perspective, including economic, social, and environmental impacts.
Activity 2: Participation in Townhall Meeting:
- Each stakeholder group gives a detailed 5-minute presentation of their position. Each stakeholder group will allocate a spokesperson for this.
- Participate in an extended discussion, demonstrating negotiation skills and the ability to integrate complex information and perspectives.
Activity 3: Reflection report
- Individually write a 1000-word essay reflecting on the role play, discussing the learning experience and how different stakeholders' needs can be balanced.
- Your reflection needs to include:
- A critical analysis of the stakeholder dynamics observed.
- Evaluation of the conflict resolution strategies employed by various roles.
- Recommendations for improving stakeholder engagement and conflict management in similar real-world scenarios.
Deliverables (individually)
- A position statement (500 words)
- A comprehensive analysis report (1000 words)
The position statement and the comprehensive analysis report are due on Friday week 4 at 2:00PM.
The role play will take place during the workshop in week 3 from 3:30PM - 5PM. This scheduling applies to all students, including both internal and external participants.
Attendance Requirement: Like an exam, the role play is a crucial component of your assessment and require either in-person attendance or participation online. Attendance is compulsory.
Rescheduling Due to Conflicts: If you have prior commitments, such as work obligations, that might conflict with your scheduled role play time, it is your responsibility to arrange for these commitments to be rescheduled. The role play must take priority as it is integral to your assessment in this class.
Planning Ahead: Please review your schedules now to ensure availability during your assigned role play time slot. If you foresee any conflicts, make arrangements as soon as possible to avoid any issues.
PLEASE NOTE: This is a mandatory component of the course, and your proactive planning and attendance are essential for successful completion. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
This is submitted in class during the relevant workshop.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
Sequential Assessment Problem-based learning 1
- Mode
- Oral, Written
- Category
- Presentation
- Weight
- 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment.
- Due date
22/08/2024 5:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L02
Task description
Objective:
To enhance the learning experience by integrating insights from the Guest Speaker into the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) framework. This workshop focuses on developing innovative, evidence-based solutions to human-wildlife conflicts through collaborative and critical application of theoretical concepts, theories, and frameworks previously discussed in class.
Overview:
This assessment centers around the presentation by the Guest Speaker, using it as a foundational element for a comprehensive PBL workshop. The task challenges students to connect theoretical frameworks to practical, real-world issues presented by the speaker, fostering a deeper understanding and engagement with the subject matter.
Workshop Structure:
- Introduction (10 minutes): A brief recap of Guest Speaker's presentation to set the context and focus of the workshop.
- Group Discussion (30 minutes): In groups of three to six, students will discuss the presentation in detail, identifying key issues and potential solutions to the human-wildlife conflicts presented. They are expected to explicitly connect these discussions to relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks covered in the preceding classes.
- Solution Development (15 minutes): Groups will develop a recommended course of action based on the insights gained from the class materials and the specific challenges highlighted by the guest speaker. These solutions should be evidence-based and theoretically grounded.
- Presentation (5 minutes per group): One student from each group will present their findings and proposed solutions. The presentation should clearly demonstrate how theoretical knowledge has been applied to solve practical problems.
Deliverables:
- From each group: A jointly produced piece of butchers' paper, visually representing their proposed solutions and the theoretical frameworks they applied.
No Show Policy:
- Written Report Requirement: Students who are unable to attend must submit a 500-word report analyzing the guest speaker’s presentation using the class concepts, theories, and frameworks. This report should propose solutions to the case presented and must be submitted within 7 days following the workshop.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
Submitted in class at the relevant workshop.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
Sequential Assessment Problem-based learning 2
- Mode
- Oral, Written
- Category
- Presentation
- Weight
- 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment
- Due date
13/09/2024 5:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L03
Task description
Objective:
To enhance the learning experience by integrating insights from the Guest Speaker into the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) framework. This workshop focuses on developing innovative, evidence-based solutions to human-wildlife conflicts through collaborative and critical application of theoretical concepts, theories, and frameworks previously discussed in class.
Overview:
This assessment centers around the presentation by the Guest Speaker, using it as a foundational element for a comprehensive PBL workshop. The task challenges students to connect theoretical frameworks to practical, real-world issues presented by the speaker, fostering a deeper understanding and engagement with the subject matter.
Workshop Structure:
- Introduction (10 minutes): A brief recap of Guest Speaker's presentation to set the context and focus of the workshop.
- Group Discussion (30 minutes): In groups of three to six, students will discuss the presentation in detail, identifying key issues and potential solutions to the human-wildlife conflicts presented. They are expected to explicitly connect these discussions to relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks covered in the preceding classes.
- Solution Development (15 minutes): Groups will develop a recommended course of action based on the insights gained from the class materials and the specific challenges highlighted by the guest speaker. These solutions should be evidence-based and theoretically grounded.
- Presentation (5 minutes per group): One student from each group will present their findings and proposed solutions. The presentation should clearly demonstrate how theoretical knowledge has been applied to solve practical problems.
Deliverables:
- From each group: A jointly produced piece of butchers' paper, visually representing their proposed solutions and the theoretical frameworks they applied.
Submission:
- Written Report Requirement: Students must submit a 500-word report analyzing the guest speaker’s presentation using the class concepts, theories, and frameworks. This report should propose solutions to the case presented.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
This assessment is submitted on Blackboard via Turnitin. You should also retain an electronic copy of every piece of assessment you submit. Legal Declaration By submitting your work via this website, you formally declare that (1) it is your own original work, and no part of the work has been copied from any other source or person except where due acknowledgement is made; (2) no part of the work has been previously submitted for assessment in this or any other institution; and (3) you have read the UQ Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy (http://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.60.04-student-integrity-and-misconduct) and understand its implications.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
Sequential Assessment Problem-based learning 3
- Mode
- Oral, Written
- Category
- Presentation
- Weight
- 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment
- Due date
19/09/2024 5:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L04
Task description
Objective:
To enhance the learning experience by integrating insights from the Guest Speaker into the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) framework. This workshop focuses on developing innovative, evidence-based solutions to human-wildlife conflicts through collaborative and critical application of theoretical concepts, theories, and frameworks previously discussed in class.
Overview:
This assessment centers around the presentation by the Guest Speaker, using it as a foundational element for a comprehensive PBL workshop. The task challenges students to connect theoretical frameworks to practical, real-world issues presented by the speaker, fostering a deeper understanding and engagement with the subject matter.
Workshop Structure:
- Introduction (10 minutes): A brief recap of Guest Speaker's presentation to set the context and focus of the workshop.
- Group Discussion (30 minutes): In groups of three to six, students will discuss the presentation in detail, identifying key issues and potential solutions to the human-wildlife conflicts presented. They are expected to explicitly connect these discussions to relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks covered in the preceding classes.
- Solution Development (15 minutes): Groups will develop a recommended course of action based on the insights gained from the class materials and the specific challenges highlighted by the guest speaker. These solutions should be evidence-based and theoretically grounded.
- Presentation (5 minutes per group): One student from each group will present their findings and proposed solutions. The presentation should clearly demonstrate how theoretical knowledge has been applied to solve practical problems.
Deliverables:
- From each group: A jointly produced piece of butchers' paper, visually representing their proposed solutions and the theoretical frameworks they applied.
Submission:
- Written Report Requirement: Students must submit a 500-word report analyzing the guest speaker’s presentation using the class concepts, theories, and frameworks. This report should propose solutions to the case presented.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
This assessment is submitted on Blackboard via Turnitin. You should also retain an electronic copy of every piece of assessment you submit. Legal Declaration By submitting your work via this website, you formally declare that (1) it is your own original work, and no part of the work has been copied from any other source or person except where due acknowledgement is made; (2) no part of the work has been previously submitted for assessment in this or any other institution; and (3) you have read the UQ Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy (http://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.60.04-student-integrity-and-misconduct) and understand its implications.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
Sequential Assessment Problem-based learning 4
- Mode
- Oral, Written
- Category
- Presentation
- Weight
- 5% This sequential assessment is worth 20% of the course assessment.
- Due date
18/10/2024 5:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L05
Task description
Objective:
To enhance the learning experience by integrating insights from the Guest Speaker into the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) framework. This workshop focuses on developing innovative, evidence-based solutions to human-wildlife conflicts through collaborative and critical application of theoretical concepts, theories, and frameworks previously discussed in class.
Overview:
This assessment centers around the presentation by the Guest Speaker, using it as a foundational element for a comprehensive PBL workshop. The task challenges students to connect theoretical frameworks to practical, real-world issues presented by the speaker, fostering a deeper understanding and engagement with the subject matter.
Workshop Structure:
- Introduction (10 minutes): A brief recap of Guest Speaker's presentation to set the context and focus of the workshop.
- Group Discussion (30 minutes): In groups of three to six, students will discuss the presentation in detail, identifying key issues and potential solutions to the human-wildlife conflicts presented. They are expected to explicitly connect these discussions to relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks covered in the preceding classes.
- Solution Development (15 minutes): Groups will develop a recommended course of action based on the insights gained from the class materials and the specific challenges highlighted by the guest speaker. These solutions should be evidence-based and theoretically grounded.
- Presentation (5 minutes per group): One student from each group will present their findings and proposed solutions. The presentation should clearly demonstrate how theoretical knowledge has been applied to solve practical problems.
Deliverables:
- From each group: A jointly produced piece of butchers' paper, visually representing their proposed solutions and the theoretical frameworks they applied.
Submission:
- Written Report Requirement: Students must submit a 500-word report analyzing the guest speaker’s presentation using the class concepts, theories, and frameworks. This report should propose solutions to the case presented.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
This assessment is submitted on Blackboard via Turnitin. You should also retain an electronic copy of every piece of assessment you submit. Legal Declaration By submitting your work via this website, you formally declare that (1) it is your own original work, and no part of the work has been copied from any other source or person except where due acknowledgement is made; (2) no part of the work has been previously submitted for assessment in this or any other institution; and (3) you have read the UQ Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy (http://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.60.04-student-integrity-and-misconduct) and understand its implications.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
Conflict management plan
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Paper/ Report/ Annotation
- Weight
- 35%
- Due date
25/10/2024 2:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L06, L07
Task description
Objective: Develop an in-depth and comprehensive management plan for a selected human-wildlife conflict, employing advanced analytical techniques and integrating multidisciplinary perspectives based on the IUCN "Good Practice Checklist."(see IUCN SSC guidelines on human-wildlife conflict and coexistence : first edition | IUCN Library System). The IUCN Good Practice Checklist is a tool designed to guide conservation practitioners, researchers, and students in evaluating, planning, and implementing human-wildlife conflict management strategies. It consists of key questions that are structured around foundational principles critical to conflict resolution and coexistence strategies.
Instructions:
Select a Conflict: Choose a complex real-world human-wildlife conflict. Detailed description of the wildlife species, affected human demographics, and geographical details must be included.
Advanced Good Practice Checklist Application:
- Detailed Conflict Analysis: Conduct a thorough analysis of the conflict’s dynamics using the levels of conflict framework.
- Comprehensive Ethical Review: Evaluate the ethical dimensions, unintended consequences, and roles of all stakeholders using case studies or precedents.
- Deep Ecological and Social Analysis: Analyze in detail the ecological behaviors of wildlife and the intricate social, cultural, historical, and political contexts using literature reviews and existing research.
- Multi-stakeholder Collaboration Strategies: Develop a detailed strategy for collaborative resolution, incorporating traditional ecological knowledge and modern conservation strategies.
- Evidence-based Planning and Actions: Propose evidence-driven and policy-informed strategies for conflict management. Incorporate references to 3-5 concepts, frameworks and theories from Module 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Management Plan Development:
- Integrated Management Approaches: Suggest integrated approaches for prevention and mitigation, detailing specific techniques and tools.
- Comprehensive Monitoring and Evaluation: Plan a detailed monitoring and evaluation strategy using quantitative and qualitative metrics.
Comprehensive Report and Presentation: Develop a comprehensive report and prepare an in-depth presentation that discusses the management plan, backed by rigorous analysis and advanced application of the good practice checklist.
General Instructions:
Familiarization: Begin by thoroughly reading the Good Practice Checklist available in the IUCN guidelines. Understand the intent and focus of each question within the checklist.
Application to the Conflict Scenario:
- For each relevant section of the checklist, clearly articulate how it applies to your selected conflict scenario.
- Provide specific examples or hypothetical situations where applicable to illustrate how the checklist guides the decisions and strategies in your management plan.
Integration:
- Integrate responses to the checklist into your overall management plan, using them to structure the report.
- Ensure that each part of the checklist is addressed in relation to the conflict scenario, emphasizing how it informs your proposed strategies.
Reflection:
- Reflect on the checklist’s role in shaping your approach to human-wildlife conflict.
- Discuss any limitations or additional considerations that might extend beyond the checklist’s scope.
Depth and Detail:
- Employ the checklist to conduct a comprehensive and detailed analysis. You are expected to delve deeper into each checklist item, using advanced theoretical frameworks, case studies, or data analysis where appropriate.
Integration with Advanced Concepts:
- Incorporate advanced concepts and methodologies from your course materials or external research to enhance the application of the checklist. This might include GIS analyses, stakeholder analysis tools, or conflict resolution models.
Word Limit:
- Your report should range between 3500 and 4000 words, allowing for detailed exploration of each checklist item. Provide detailed justifications for your strategies and reflect critically on the checklist’s application and any modifications or additions you propose.
Submission Format:
- Report Structure: Organize your report to follow the structure of the checklist, with each section of your management plan corresponding to checklist items.
- Visual Aids: Include tables, figures, or charts that help illustrate how checklist items are applied within your management plan.
- References: Cite all sources appropriately, including any direct references to the IUCN guidelines and the checklist. Use the APA referencing style.
This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance.
A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
You must submit your Assessment task, in Blackboard, via the Conflict management report link by the submission deadline. You should also retain an electronic copy of every piece of assessment you submit. Legal Declaration By submitting your work via this website, you formally declare that (1) it is your own original work, and no part of the work has been copied from any other source or person except where due acknowledgement is made; (2) no part of the work has been previously submitted for assessment in this or any other institution; and (3) you have read the UQ Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy (http://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.60.04-student-integrity-and-misconduct) and understand its implications.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Assessment deadlines are firm and must be met. Late submission without permission or non-submission of assessable work will result in penalties being applied. Late submission of assessment will only be granted for documented medical reasons, accident, bereavement, jury service and other circumstances allowed in the UQ Policies and Procedures Library (PPL). See 6.1 Assessment Related Policies & Guidelines for links to the University Guidelines and Applications for Extensions.
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item, or one grade per day if graded on the basis of 1-7, or equivalent penalty if an alternative grading approach is used, will be deducted per day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point any submission will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.
Submission of an Extension of Assessment Due Date (EADD) should be completed online through your My Requests tab via my.UQ Dashboard before the due date of the assessment item.
Exam
- Hurdle
- Identity Verified
- In-person
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Examination
- Weight
- 30%
- Due date
End of Semester Exam Period
2/11/2024 - 16/11/2024
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07
Task description
Format: The exam will be composed of short essay questions designed to evaluate students' comprehensive understanding of the course content, focusing on the application of knowledge to real-world scenarios. This format is intended to test analytical skills and the ability to synthesize information across various modules.
Content: The exam will cover all six modules of the course, testing knowledge on the theoretical frameworks and practical tools discussed throughout the semester:
- Module 1: Analyzing human-wildlife interactions.
- Module 2: Application of informational tools in conflict scenarios.
- Module 3: Effectiveness of regulatory tools in wildlife management.
- Module 4: Financial strategies for wildlife conservation.
- Module 5: Voluntary tools and their role in community engagement.
- Module 6: Methods for evaluating the outcomes of wildlife interaction strategies.
Expectations: The exam is designed to be challenging, authentic, and reflective of the complexities involved in human-wildlife interactions. Students are expected to demonstrate a detailed understanding of each module, connecting theoretical knowledge with practical applications. Questions will require thoughtful analysis, integration of concepts across different contexts, and critical engagement with the material.
Independent Understanding: To pass this assessment, students must be able to discuss and defend their responses independently, showing a thorough grasp of the concepts and their applications without undue reliance on AI or other sources.
Duration: The exam will last for 2 hours, providing ample time for students to articulate well-reasoned answers and showcase their understanding of the course content.
Preparation: Review of all lecture notes, assigned readings, and case studies is essential. Participation in discussions and a deep understanding of the practical applications of concepts discussed in each module will be beneficial.
Assessment Criteria: Responses will be evaluated based on their accuracy, analytical depth, relevance to the questions, and the ability to synthesize information from various course components. The quality of writing, clarity of argument, and appropriate referencing of sources are crucial.
Hurdle requirements
Students must pass the exam in order to pass the course.Exam details
| Planning time | 10 minutes |
|---|---|
| Duration | 120 minutes |
| Calculator options | Any calculator permitted |
| Open/closed book | Closed Book examination - no written materials permitted |
| Exam platform | Paper based |
| Invigilation | Invigilated in person |
Submission guidelines
Deferral or extension
You may be able to defer this exam.
Course grading
Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.
| Grade | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 (Low Fail) |
Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: 0% - 34% |
| 2 (Fail) |
Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: 35% - 46% |
| 3 (Marginal Fail) |
Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes Course grade description: A cumulative score of 47% - 49% for all assessment items. OR A cumulative score of 50% or greater for all assessment items AND less than a passing mark in the final exam |
| 4 (Pass) |
Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: A cumulative score of 50% - 64% for all assessment items |
| 5 (Credit) |
Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: A cumulative score of 65% - 74% for all assessment items |
| 6 (Distinction) |
Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: A cumulative score of 75% - 84% for all assessment items |
| 7 (High Distinction) |
Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: A cumulative score of 85% - 100% for all assessment items |
Additional course grading information
Course Grading Rules and Assessment Hurdles
You must achieve a cumulative score of at least 50% for all assessment items ANDﾠa passing mark in the final exam.
If a student obtains an overall percentage greater than the cut-offs set to achieve a 4 or higher for the course based on marks from a combination of progressive assessment and the student does not achieve a passing mark in the final exam they are unable to achieve a grade higher than a 3 (failing grade) for the course.
Additional Information
You must address any additional assessment requirements identified in this eCP.
Supplementary assessment
Supplementary assessment is available for this course.
Additional assessment information
Please note the following when writing assignments
You must not re-use past work from previous assessments in your assignments.
Turnitinﾠ
Assignments that are required to be submitted through TurnItIn, mustﾠonlyﾠbe uploaded to the assessment specific Turnitin link on the relevant course Blackboard site.ﾠ If you submit any version of your assessment item to any alternative Turnitin link, this is considered cheating and you will be held liable for this action.ﾠ
Academic Integrity and Plagiarism
All reported work must be done by the individual student. Assignments that look and sound alike will be reported as plagiarism – a serious offence at UQ. Please note the university’s policy on academic integrity and plagiarism which can be accessed atﾠhttp://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.60.04-student-integrity-and-misconduct
Release of marks
Unless specifically indicated by the lecturer involved,ﾠevery attempt will be made to haveﾠthe results for progressive assessment tasks available within 3 weeks of submission. For items of assessment submitted in the last 2 weeks of the semester, the results will be available before the day of your end of semester examination in the course, unless otherwise indicated by the Course Coordinator. Results and feedback availability will be advised to you by email or announced via the course Blackboard site.ﾠ
Re-mark Applications – refer to theﾠUniversity's Re-mark Policyﾠto check your eligibility
Before applying for a remark, students should consider the following:
- You have consulted the course coordinator for feedback
- Your academic grounds for remark have been discussed and are valid
- Wanting a higher grade is not grounds for a remark. A remark can decrease your grade.
Remark applicationsﾠwill notﾠbe considered without first having contacted your course Co-ordinator.
Deferred and Supplementary assessment (including Deferred Mid-Semester Examinations)
Deferred and Supplementary information can be located on the my.UQ website
Learning resources
You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.
Library resources
Find the required and recommended resources for this course on the UQ Library website.
Other course materials
If we've listed something under further requirement, you'll need to provide your own.
Required
| Item | Description | Further Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| ANIM7023 Course Profile | provides details of specifications, rationale, aims and structure of the course. It also informs you of the assessment for this course, including weightings and due dates. | |
| ANIM7023 Blackboard site | Blackboard is the main method of communication for this course. https://learn.uq.edu.au/ |
Additional learning resources information
Further readingsﾠ- We strongly encourage you to read widely, relying on refereed sources (journal articles, books). Some references to key readings will be suggested on Blackboard.
Please note: This course ANIM7023ﾠis co-taught with ANIM2033, these courses share a Blackboard site.
Learning activities
The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.
Filter activity type by
Please select
| Learning period | Activity type | Topic |
|---|---|---|
Multiple weeks From Week 1 To Week 3 |
Workshop |
Module 1 - Analysing HWIs HWI in contemporary society, planning for co-existence, levels of conflict. Learning outcomes: L01 |
Multiple weeks From Week 4 To Week 5 |
Workshop |
Module 2 - Voluntary tools Stakeholders, perceptions, values and behaviour change. Learning outcomes: L02 |
Multiple weeks From Week 6 To Week 7 |
Workshop |
Module 3 - Informational tools The role of scientific knowledge and traditional knowledge in conflict management Learning outcomes: L03 |
Multiple weeks From Week 8 To Week 9 |
Workshop |
Module 4 - Financial tools Policy factors, governance and institutions Learning outcomes: L04 |
Mid Sem break (23 Sep - 29 Sep) |
Not Timetabled |
In-Semester break (Reading) Use this time to catch up on reading and completion of assignments. |
Multiple weeks From Week 10 To Week 11 |
Workshop |
Module 5 - Regulatory tools Financial and economic incentives to increase tolerance and co-existence Learning outcomes: L05 |
Multiple weeks From Week 12 To Week 13 |
Workshop |
Module 6 - Evaluation evaluation of management of HWI, recap, exam training Learning outcomes: L06, L07 |
Policies and procedures
University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:
- Student Code of Conduct Policy
- Student Integrity and Misconduct Policy and Procedure
- Assessment Procedure
- Examinations Procedure
- Reasonable Adjustments - Students Policy and Procedure
Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.