Skip to menu Skip to content Skip to footer
Course profile

Applied Anthropology and Indigenous Territories (ANTH2260)

Study period
Sem 1 2026
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person

Course overview

Study period
Semester 1, 2026 (23/02/2026 - 20/06/2026)
Study level
Undergraduate
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person
Units
2
Administrative campus
St Lucia
Coordinating unit
Social Science School

This course offers an introduction to the theory and practice of applied anthropology in Australia and comparative international contexts like New Zealand, Canada, and the United States of America. Seminars will particularly focus on skills for working with Indigenous people and territories, particularly in the areas of native title research, cultural heritage management, and development. Students also have the opportunity to participate in a fieldtrip to an Aboriginal cultural landscape destination to learn about applied anthropology and Indigenous territories in a real-world setting outside the University.

The course focuses on applied anthropology with Indigenous people around the world. We will also address other settings and contexts where applied anthropologists work in design, business and development. Students in this course will learn anthropological theory relevant to applied research as well as analytical and methodological skills required to work effectively with Indigenous people. This includes an exciting opportunity for students to gain real-world experience in an anthropological field setting.

This course has an introductory module leading to more advanced training in applied anthropology, which makes it suitable for those with a background in anthropology as well as students with backgrounds in archaeology, architecture, development studies, geography, political science, law, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, and other disciplines. Course modules provide intensive training in ethnographic interviewing and fieldwork skills, as well as familiarising students with the commercial aspects of applied anthropological work.

The topics for each week are outlined in this course instance. This course incorporates forms of Work Integrated Learning and Authentic Assessment through knowledge and skill development during the seminars and fieldwork.

Course requirements

Assumed background

An interest in anthropology and Indigenous studies

Recommended prerequisites

We recommend completing the following courses before enrolling in this one:

ANTH2010

Restrictions

ANTH7260

Course contact

Course coordinator

Dr Richard Martin

Please email me to arrange a consultation time. I am generally available in the afternoons on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday to discuss the course.ᅠ

School enquiries

Student Enquiries School of Social Science

Level 3, Michie Building (09), St Lucia Campus, The University of Queensland.

Monday-Friday, 9:00am-12:00pm, 1:00pm-4:00pm.

Course staff

Lecturer

Timetable

The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.

Additional timetable information

Teaching staff do not have access to the timetabling system to help with class allocation. Therefore, should you need help with your timetable and/or allocation of classes, please ensure you email the School of Social Science Administration Team at student.socsci@uq.edu.au from your UQ student email account with the following details: full name, student ID, and course code. 

Aims and outcomes

The aims of this course areᅠthat studentsᅠgain:

  • An understanding of anthropological theory as relevant to the study of Indigenous history and culture
  • An understanding of the relationship between anthropological theory and practice in Australia and comparative international contexts (New Zealand, Canada, and the United States of America)
  • Practical skills for working with Indigenous people in the areas of native title research, cultural heritage protection, and contestations over developmentᅠ
  • A critical understanding of political and ethical issues associated with applied anthropologyᅠ

Learning outcomes

After successfully completing this course you should be able to:

LO1.

Demonstrate knowledge of anthropological theory as relevant to the study of Indigenous history and culture

LO2.

Demonstrate knowledge of the relationship between the theory and practice of anthropology in Australia and comparative contexts

LO3.

Practice applied anthropological methods of participant observation, interviewing, and cultural mapping

LO4.

Express an informed opinion on ethical issues relating to applied anthropological research.

LO5.

Undertake successful academic research in the library, in archival collections and with electronic resources.

LO6.

Demonstrate competence in methodologies pertinent to research undertaken with Indigenous peoples

Assessment

Assessment summary

Category Assessment task Weight Due date
Reflection Reflection on positionality
  • In-person
20%

Presented in class in weeks 4, 5, 6, and 7 (if necessary). You MUST present your positionality in class and be prepared to answer questions. The date will be assigned at the beginning of the semester.

Essay/ Critique 1500 word essay 40%

1/05/2026 2:00 pm

Paper/ Report/ Annotation Field-Based Cultural Interpretation Comprising Preliminary Reflection (10%) and Professional Advisory Memo (30%)
  • Hurdle
40%

Part A: In-Field Preliminary Reflection (10%) 9/05/2026 4:00 pm

Part B: Field-Based Professional Advisory Memo (30%) 27/05/2026 2:00 pm

A hurdle is an assessment requirement that must be satisfied in order to receive a specific grade for the course. Check the assessment details for more information about hurdle requirements.

Assessment details

Reflection on positionality

  • In-person
Mode
Oral
Category
Reflection
Weight
20%
Due date

Presented in class in weeks 4, 5, 6, and 7 (if necessary). You MUST present your positionality in class and be prepared to answer questions. The date will be assigned at the beginning of the semester.

Other conditions
Secure.

See the conditions definitions

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L04, L05, L06

Task description

This assessment requires you to present a short reflection in class about your own positionality in relation to your work goals. The reflection should be a maximum of 5 minutes long and must cover the following points:

  • Introduce yourself and explain your work/career goals
  • Explain how you will use what you learn in anthropology to achieve these goals. Make reference to readings and/or lecture slides about applied anthropology to contextualise your work/career aspirations in relation to the example of people like Genevieve Bell, Gillian Tett, as well as the guest speakers you have heard from in seminars. What kinds of content knowledge/skills/theory from anthropology is relevant to your goals?
  • Critically reflect on your own positionality and its relevance to your goals. Positionality refers to how your culture, identity, and position in society shape your experience of the world, how you perceive others, and how others perceive you. Depending on your positionality, you may wish to reflect on the benefits and/or challenges of conducting anthropological research in an Indigenous community as an Indigenous person (if you are Indigenous). Alternatively, you may wish to reflect on conducting research with Indigenous people as an Australian citizen who is non-Indigenous, or as a non-citizen who is Indigenous in another setting (e.g., a Native American working in Australia), or as a person with another background and heritage. You may wish to consider your gender, class or religious background or belief system, your cultural and educational background or ethnicity, work experience, the languages you speak, whether you have a rural or urban background, and so on.

Given the focus of this course, you are encouraged to engage with your positionality particularly in relation to 'Indigenous territories'. Please note, there is no right or wrong answer to this question. You will instead be marked on your ability to critically reflect on your positionality in relation to the experience of working as an anthropologist. You do not have to be comprehensive about your positionality, but should focus on one or two aspects of it. To prepare for this assessment, you should reflect on the different contexts in which you may work in the future, and the ways in which your positionality may have benefits and/or challenges in different contexts. Different aspects of your positionality may well come to shape your work in different ways, particularly your work with Indigenous peoples, and this assessment is asking you to start to think about how you will manage this, and to share your thoughts with the class. This is intended to assess your developing capacity for reflexivity and professional self-understanding, rather than polished performance or scripted responses.

Please note: according to University policy, student presentations must be recorded and stored in the event that students ask for a re-mark. In keeping with this policy, presentations will be audio recorded and stored in a secured folder on the University server. Presentations will be deleted from this folder after 1 year.

Marking criteria and/or marking rubrics are available in the ‘Assessment’ folder in Blackboard Ultra for this course. 

Use of AI: This assessment task is to be completed in-person. Any use of AI tools in preparing this reflection (e.g., for brainstorming or structuring ideas) must be declared by identifying the model used (e.g., ChatGPT5.2) and sequence of prompts used. Please note that this assessment requires you to articulate and explain your own positionality in real time. You will be questioned about your reflection and must be able to explain and expand on your position without reference to AI-generated material. Inability to do so may affect the mark awarded.

Submission guidelines

Presented in class.

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

Please note that from Semester 2, 2025 the Assessment Procedure has changed. You must submit your application on or before the assessment due date and time.  

Grounds of an Extension 

A list of acceptable reasons for an extension and the evidence you must provide can be found here. Your request may be refused if you do not meet the acceptable reasons for an extension. All extension requests must be accompanied by documentation that supports the reason for the request. The student submitting the request is fully responsible for all supporting documentation that is provided with the request and should ensure all documents are authentic. 

Students registered with Student Support and Wellbeing Services / SAP 

In the School of Social Science, extensions granted on the basis of registration with Student Support and Wellbeing Services (SSWS) or a Student Access Plan (SAP) will be the lesser of 7 calendar days or the maximum extension allowable for the assessment task. 

More information is provided in Part D of the Assessment Procedure. 

Discretionary Extensions 

You are eligible for a discretionary extension for a single assessment task per semester of study for a duration of 48 hours, with no documentation required. You can apply if the assessment task allows (see the course profile for details) and if it is your first extension request for that assessment.  

You cannot receive an extension using both discretionary grounds and SAP grounds for the same assessment and must select one basis when making their initial request. 

Maximum Extension Requests 

You can request a maximum of 3 extensions for the same assessment task. If a third extension is necessary, you must submit an Assessment Management Plan in addition to your supporting documentation with your request. If after the third approved extension you submit the assessment late, late penalties will apply. 

Late Extension Applications 

Late applications must include evidence of the reasons for the late request, detailing why you were unable to apply for an extension by the due date and time. The School of Social Science will not accept personal statements. 

Additional information 

Extension requests are processed and managed by the School of Social Science Administration Team. Course Coordinators are unable to grant extensions directly.  

Extensions in your final semester of study could delay your graduation to the next graduation period. 

Late submission

You will receive a mark of 0 if this assessment is submitted late.

1500 word essay

Mode
Written
Category
Essay/ Critique
Weight
40%
Due date

1/05/2026 2:00 pm

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L04, L05, L06

Task description

The second assessment asks you to expand your reading and research into native title by undertaking an analysis of one native title case. You can choose either a successful one (e.g. Rainbow on behalf of the Kurtjar People v State of Queensland (No 2) [2021] FCA 1251) or one unsuccessful native title claim (e.g. Malone v State of Queensland (The Clermont-Belyando Area Native Title Claim) (No 5) [2021] FCA 1639; Blucher on behalf of the Gaangalu Nation People v State of Queensland (No 3) [2023] FCA 600).

Your essay must:

  • outline the ethnographic context of your case study (where was it? who were the claimants? how was the traditional system of land and water rights and interests described?)
  • describe any features unique to the case, such as the traditional rights and interests claimed 
  • refer explicitly to at least two specific passages from the judgement where anthropological evidence was evaluated by the Court
  • explain the outcome of the case in relation to the requirements of the section 223(1) of the Native Title Act (e.g. why in your view was your case successful or unsuccessful?)
  • provide a critical review of the reasons for judgement (e.g. do you agree with the judge's decisions to award or deny native title?)
  • conclude with a critical reflection on the strengths and weaknesses of the Native Title Act in its ability to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders' connections to land and waters.

Marking criteria and/or marking rubrics are available in the ‘Assessment’ folder in Blackboard Ultra for this course. 

Use of AI: You must declare any use of AI by clearly identifying the model used (e.g., ChatGPT5.2) and the sequence of prompts used. Please note, AI models are highly vulnerable to errors when describing ethnographic evidence and may misrepresent how such evidence is interpreted in judicial reasoning. Students are expected to independently verify all ethnographic and legal claims against the judgement itself. You are accountable for all claims made in your submission.

Submission guidelines

You must submit your assessment electronically by the due time, on the due date. 

Your assessment must be submitted via Turnitin on Blackboard Ultra. To submit your assessment electronically log in to Blackboard Ultra with your UQ username and password and navigate to the relevant submission link for that assessment item on Blackboard Ultra. No emailed submissions of assessments will be accepted. 

By submitting your assessment through Turnitin, you confirm that all work is your own, except where properly referenced. Only submit assessments that contain your original work. 

You are required to retain proof of submission of your assessment. Your Digital Receipt is available for download from your Assignment Dashboard. If you cannot see your submission and download your digital receipt within a few hours, your assessment has not been successfully submitted; please submit again.  

If you are experiencing technical difficulties with Blackboard, please contact the ITS Support Team

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

Please note that from Semester 2, 2025 the Assessment Procedure has changed. You must submit your application on or before the assessment due date and time.  

Grounds of an Extension 

A list of acceptable reasons for an extension and the evidence you must provide can be found here. Your request may be refused if you do not meet the acceptable reasons for an extension. All extension requests must be accompanied by documentation that supports the reason for the request. The student submitting the request is fully responsible for all supporting documentation that is provided with the request and should ensure all documents are authentic. 

Students registered with Student Support and Wellbeing Services / SAP 

In the School of Social Science, extensions granted on the basis of registration with Student Support and Wellbeing Services (SSWS) or a Student Access Plan (SAP) will be the lesser of 7 calendar days or the maximum extension allowable for the assessment task. 

More information is provided in Part D of the Assessment Procedure. 

Discretionary Extensions 

You are eligible for a discretionary extension for a single assessment task per semester of study for a duration of 48 hours, with no documentation required. You can apply if the assessment task allows (see the course profile for details) and if it is your first extension request for that assessment.  

You cannot receive an extension using both discretionary grounds and SAP grounds for the same assessment and must select one basis when making their initial request. 

Maximum Extension Requests 

You can request a maximum of 3 extensions for the same assessment task. If a third extension is necessary, you must submit an Assessment Management Plan in addition to your supporting documentation with your request. If after the third approved extension you submit the assessment late, late penalties will apply. 

Late Extension Applications 

Late applications must include evidence of the reasons for the late request, detailing why you were unable to apply for an extension by the due date and time. The School of Social Science will not accept personal statements. 

Additional information 

Extension requests are processed and managed by the School of Social Science Administration Team. Course Coordinators are unable to grant extensions directly.  

Extensions in your final semester of study could delay your graduation to the next graduation period. 

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Assessments will not be accepted if it is more than one week (7 calendar days) late without prior approval. 

Field-Based Cultural Interpretation Comprising Preliminary Reflection (10%) and Professional Advisory Memo (30%)

  • Hurdle
Mode
Written
Category
Paper/ Report/ Annotation
Weight
40%
Due date

Part A: In-Field Preliminary Reflection (10%) 9/05/2026 4:00 pm

Part B: Field-Based Professional Advisory Memo (30%) 27/05/2026 2:00 pm

Other conditions
Secure.

See the conditions definitions

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L05, L06

Task description

Students are required to produce an in-field preliminary reflection and professional advisory memo that identifies, interprets, and responds to a specific tension, ambiguity, or opportunity observed during the field trip, and proposes a culturally appropriate interpretative response grounded in field observations, seminar discussions, and course readings. This assessment has two parts.

Part A: In-Field Preliminary Reflection (10%)

Immediately following the field trip, you will be given one hour to write a short preliminary reflection based on your observations from the field. This reflection is intended to capture your initial observations, questions, and uncertainties before they are shaped by later discussion, reading, or writing.

This task assesses your attentiveness in the field and your capacity to begin thinking anthropologically in situ.

For your in-field reflection, you must:

  • record key observations you made during the field trip;
  • note any moments of uncertainty, tension, or ambiguity you noticed;
  • identify one or two questions that arose for you in relation to Indigenous presence, absence, authority, recognition, or representation;
  • briefly reflect on how your own positionality may have shaped what you noticed or did not notice.

Conditions:

  • This task will be completed in person, immediately following the field trip.
  • The reflection will be handwritten.
  • You may not use generative AI tools during this task. You must put your phone away and not look at it for the duration of this hour.
  • Your reflection will be submitted at the end of the one-hour period.


Note: you are not expected to produce a polished or complete analysis at this stage. Notes, bullet points, and sketches are acceptable.

This task will be due the same day as the field trip, exactly 1 hour after the conclusion of the field activities.

Part B: Field-Based Professional Advisory Memo (30%)

This part of the assessment requires you produce a short professional memo based on your field observations, seminars, and course readings. The memo simulates advisory work undertaken by applied anthropologists when working in urban contexts where Indigenous presence, absence, authority, recognition, and representation are complex and often contested.

You are not being asked to provide a comprehensive cultural history. Instead, the task assesses your ability to identify an issue arising during the field trip and to analyse its implications using concepts, ethics, and methods from applied anthropology.

In your memo, you must:

  • Identify a field-based issue, uncertainty, or point of tension you observed during the field trip relating to Indigenous presence, absence, authority, recognition, and representation. You should draw on your in-field preliminary reflection as a starting point for this analysis.
  • Analyse the issue by drawing on concepts, readings, and seminar discussions from the course (e.g., about applied anthropology and its history with Indigenous peoples; ethics; Indigenous authority, culture, and law and custom; native title and recognition)
  • Reflect on your positionality and the ethical and epistemic limits on what can and cannot be known, represented, or recommended in this context. You should demonstrate awareness of how applied anthropologists work with incomplete, contested, or constrained information.
  • Propose one interpretative or engagement response that addresses the issue identified. Your recommendations should address processes (such as consultation pathways, interpretative caution, further inquiry) and avoid definitive claims about culture.
  • Include a field evidence appendix that documents the field-based material informing your memo. This may include excerpts from your in-field preliminary reflection; brief field notes from the field trip; annotated sketches, maps, or photographs; notes from the field trip debrief seminar. This appendix should demonstrate what you noticed in the field rather than provide further analysis.

Word limits:

  • In-Field Preliminary Reflection: no word limit
  • Professional Advisory Memo: maximum 1,000 words
  • Field Evidence Appendix: maximum 800 words.

Marking criteria and/or marking rubrics are available in the ‘Assessment’ folder in Blackboard Ultra for this course. 

Use of AI: This assessment task evaluates students' ability to make professional judgements grounded in shared field experience. AI tools may be used for preliminary preparation, e.g., to organise notes or undertake coding. The use of AI tools to generate field evidence is prohibited and may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. Students MUST be able to explain and defend their analysis with reference to specific field observations and your in-field preliminary reflection.

Fieldtrip participation and alternative written examination:

This course includes a field-based learning activity that forms the basis of Assessment 3. Participation is expected, as it provides essential shared field experience that cannot be replicated in the classroom. Students who are unable to attend the field trip will not be able to complete the field-based assessment and will instead be required to sit an alternative written examination assessing the same learning outcomes. The alternative assessment is not a substitute for the field trip experience but provides an alternative means of demonstrating course learning outcomes. Students who undertake the exam will complete a field-method simulation under exam conditions. They will be provided with curated field materials (eg., photographs, excerpts of field notes, archival documents) and required to analyse them using participant observation, interviewing and cultural mapping as methodological frameworks. While they will not undertake direct observation, they will demonstrate applied understanding of these methods and their limits in Indigenous research contexts.

Hurdle requirements

Assessment 3 is designed as a hurdle because it is the only assessment in the course that requires students to demonstrate minimum competency in applied anthropological method and field-based professional judgement. In particular, it addresses LO3 through direct observation, in-field documentation, and the production of field evidence, and LO6 through the advisory memo, which requires students to interpret ambiguity, address epistemic limits, and propose ethically appropriate processes. While assessments 1 and 2 evaluate theoretical knowledge, research skills, and ethical reasoning, they do not require students to enact applied field methods or exercise professional judgement grounded in empirical observation. Assessment 3 therefore uniquely assess threshold applied competency and for this reason it constitutes a hurdle. Students are required to pass this hurdle to pass the course. Students who compete the alternative written examination will be assessed against the same learning outcomes through structured analysis of provided field materials.

Submission guidelines

You must submit your handwritten in-field preliminary assessments in person on the due date.

You must submit your memo electronically by the due time, on the due date. 

Your assessment must be submitted via Turnitin on Blackboard Ultra. To submit your assessment electronically log in to Blackboard Ultra with your UQ username and password and navigate to the relevant submission link for that assessment item on Blackboard Ultra. No emailed submissions of assessments will be accepted. 

By submitting your assessment through Turnitin, you confirm that all work is your own, except where properly referenced. Only submit assessments that contain your original work. 

You are required to retain proof of submission of your assessment. Your Digital Receipt is available for download from your Assignment Dashboard. If you cannot see your submission and download your digital receipt within a few hours, your assessment has not been successfully submitted; please submit again.  

If you are experiencing technical difficulties with Blackboard, please contact the ITS Support Team

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 7 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

Please note that from Semester 2, 2025 the Assessment Procedure has changed. You must submit your application on or before the assessment due date and time.  

Grounds of an Extension 

A list of acceptable reasons for an extension and the evidence you must provide can be found here. Your request may be refused if you do not meet the acceptable reasons for an extension. All extension requests must be accompanied by documentation that supports the reason for the request. The student submitting the request is fully responsible for all supporting documentation that is provided with the request and should ensure all documents are authentic. 

Students registered with Student Support and Wellbeing Services / SAP 

In the School of Social Science, extensions granted on the basis of registration with Student Support and Wellbeing Services (SSWS) or a Student Access Plan (SAP) will be the lesser of 7 calendar days or the maximum extension allowable for the assessment task. 

More information is provided in Part D of the Assessment Procedure. 

Discretionary Extensions 

You are eligible for a discretionary extension for a single assessment task per semester of study for a duration of 48 hours, with no documentation required. You can apply if the assessment task allows (see the course profile for details) and if it is your first extension request for that assessment.  

You cannot receive an extension using both discretionary grounds and SAP grounds for the same assessment and must select one basis when making their initial request. 

Maximum Extension Requests 

You can request a maximum of 3 extensions for the same assessment task. If a third extension is necessary, you must submit an Assessment Management Plan in addition to your supporting documentation with your request. If after the third approved extension you submit the assessment late, late penalties will apply. 

Late Extension Applications 

Late applications must include evidence of the reasons for the late request, detailing why you were unable to apply for an extension by the due date and time. The School of Social Science will not accept personal statements. 

Additional information 

Extension requests are processed and managed by the School of Social Science Administration Team. Course Coordinators are unable to grant extensions directly.  

Extensions in your final semester of study could delay your graduation to the next graduation period. 

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Course grading

Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.

Grade Cut off Percent Description
1 (Low Fail) 1 - 29

Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

2 (Fail) 30 - 44

Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

3 (Marginal Fail) 45 - 49

Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes

4 (Pass) 50 - 64

Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes.

5 (Credit) 65 - 74

Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes.

6 (Distinction) 75 - 84

Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes.

7 (High Distinction) 85 - 100

Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Supplementary assessment

Supplementary assessment is available for this course.

Supplementary assessment is an additional opportunity to demonstrate that the learning requirements and graduate attributes for an eligible course have been attained. Supplementary assessment may only be granted where Supplementary Assessment – procedures allow, and only for students who receive a final grade of 3 or N. A passing grade of 4 (or P) is the highest grade that can be awarded in a course where supplementary assessment has been granted. For further information on supplementary assessment please see my.UQ

Additional assessment information

Academic Integrity: You must complete the Academic Integrity Modules by the due date. 

School Guide for Written Assessments: School of Social Science Guide for Written Assessments 

Release of Marks: The marks and feedback for assessments will be released to you in a timely manner, prior to the due date of the next assessment piece for the course. This is with the exception of the final piece of assessment. The marks and feedback for the final assessment item will only be made available on the Finalisation of Grades date at the end of semester.  

Assessment Re-mark: For information on requesting an assessment re-mark, please view the following page on my.UQ: https://my.uq.edu.au/querying-result  

Student Grievance Resolution and Appeals: If you are dissatisfied with the outcome, you may appeal through the Formal Administrative Grievances/Appeals process as per the Student Grievance Resolution Procedure. Before submitting an appeal, it is recommended that you review the Student Grievance Resolution Guideline. If you require help with drafting an appeal, Student Advocacy and Support can provide assistance. Time limits apply to submit an appeal; please refer to Student Grievance Resolution Procedure for the relevant timeframes.  

Learning resources

You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.

Library resources

Library resources are available on the UQ Library website.

Learning activities

The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.

Filter activity type by

Please select
Clear filters
Learning period Activity type Topic
Week 1

(23 Feb - 01 Mar)

Seminar

Introduction: Applied and Engaged Anthropology

What is applied anthropology? How do anthropologists work to make a difference in the world?

In this introductory seminar we will look at some of the settings and contexts in which anthropologists work outside universities, including with Indigenous people, as well as in design, business, and development projects around the world.

To prepare for this seminar, please watch the YouTube clip about Genevieve Bell, read the extract from Gillian Tett's book, Tett & Friedman's book and the overview provided by Paul Sillitoe.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 2

(02 Mar - 08 Mar)

Seminar

History and Theory of Applied Anthropology

This seminar looks at the history of applied anthropology, examining the shifting ways in which anthropologists have worked in Australia and internationally.

This seminar also addresses theory relevant to applied research, as well as some of the politics and ethics of applied anthropology, including the concept of 'positionality' which we will engage with in our presentations.

Make sure you attend this seminar as we will be using this time to schedule the date of the presentations.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 3

(09 Mar - 15 Mar)

Seminar

Applied Anthropology with Indigenous Peoples

This seminar addresses some of the contexts in which anthropologists work with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia, and Indigenous peoples internationally, on matters relating to colonialism, land rights and native title, cultural heritage protection, intra-Indigenous disputes, mining agreements, economic development, and so on.

In this seminar, we will also expand our thinking about positionality by considering the perspectives of several Indigenous scholars.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 4

(16 Mar - 22 Mar)

Seminar

Ethics in Applied Research and Presentations

Applied research involves investigating real-life situations and making decisions which will affect the lives of others, including Indigenous peoples. It often involves liaising with national governments and the United Nations, non-government organisations (like Oxfam), development agencies (like the World Bank), as well as businesses like mining companies.

Each of our engagements as applied anthropologists involve complex ethical considerations. To guide our work, we draw on ethics documents such as the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) Code of Ethics, Australian Anthropological Society (AAS) Code of Ethics and the UN Declaration On the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). In this seminar, we will examine some of the concepts in these documents, such as the concept of 'free, prior and informed consent'. We will also workshop how to apply ethics codes such as the AIATSIS Code to a range of real-life work scenarios.

This week, we will also begin our presentations, which will continue until the mid-semester break.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L04, L05, L06

Week 5

(23 Mar - 29 Mar)

Seminar

Australian Native Title (1) and Presentations

This week provides an introduction to Australian native title anthropology, focusing on the history of land rights, native title, and cultural heritage legislation and jurisprudence in Australia and comparative international contexts like the United States, Canada, and New Zealand.

This week we will also continue our presentations.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L04, L06

Week 6

(30 Mar - 05 Apr)

Seminar

Australian Native Title (2) and Presentations

This week's seminar describes the role of applied anthropologists in the Australian native title system. We will discuss different aspects of native title with a particular focus on anthropologists' role in (1) establishing the society to which Aboriginal people belonged at sovereignty; (2) understanding traditional law and custom; (3) proving continuity of connection under traditional law and custom.

This is the third week of presentations.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L04, L06

Week 7

(13 Apr - 19 Apr)

Seminar

Anthropology after Native Title and Presentations (if required)

This week's class will consider critiques of the native title system and hear from senior Indigenous speakers about life after native title, including the challenges involved in managing native title rights and the work that anthropologists do with Indigenous corporations like Prescribed Bodies Corporate.

We will also conclude our presentations this week.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L04, L06

Week 8

(20 Apr - 26 Apr)

Seminar

Introduction to the workshop module

This week's seminar will introduce the practical module of the course, explain the brief for the applied anthropology design project (the 'Documenting Indigenous values after native title' final assessment), and provide a discussion of some of the practical skills that applied anthropologists use, including the skills you will need for your project (and final assessment).

This will be followed by methods seminars focused on developing practical skills for anthropological work, beginning with a focus on working in response to a brief.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Seminar

Methods 1: Ethnography

The seminar focuses on the practical skills needed to elicit ethnographic data for applied purposes.

We will specifically learn:

* Preparation and planning for fieldwork (site visits, site surveys and off-site interviews);

* How to find people and assess whether you are talking to the right person (involving considerations of who speaks for an area, kinship relations, ritual specialists, gender relations);

* How to know what to ask about when you find someone (what kind of information do you need?);

* How to record information (note taking, audio recordings, video, GPS, topographic maps); and,

* How to write up information as fieldnotes (transcription techniques, addressing and maintaining your fieldnotes, mapping).

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 9

(27 Apr - 03 May)

Seminar

Methods 2: The Art of Listening

This seminar focuses on applied skills for interviewing.

We will specifically learn:

* Planning for interviews and building discussion guides

* Avoiding leading questions

* Listening, note-taking, and avoiding bias

* Managing data

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Seminar

Methods 3: The Art of Looking

This seminar focuses on participant observation.

We will specifically learn:

* What to look for? What is the point of participant observation?

* How to make fieldnotes

* How to categorise and manage field data

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 10

(04 May - 10 May)

Fieldwork

Fieldtrip: Interpreting Place After Native Title

This week involves an ethnographic field trip focused on Indigenous presence, absence, recognition, authority, and representation in Brisbane. Attendance is linked to the final assessment,. If you are unable to attend, you will be required to complete an invigilated exam. You will be given specific information about where to meet and what to bring closer to the date. We should be finished by 4 pm. Please note: due to the Labour Day Public holiday, we will not have a seminar on Monday of this week.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 11

(11 May - 17 May)

Seminar

Fieldtrip debrief and final assessment seminar

This week provides an opportunity to debrief about the field trip and start to think about how to turn your data into a report and with recommendations that engage with limits of your knowledge. During class, we will undertake a short activity utilising an excerpt of anonymised field notes to ask: (1) what matters here? (2) what can't be claimed? (3) what is one cautious recommendation you could make, and why?

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L05, L06

Week 12

(18 May - 24 May)

Seminar

Assessment Check-In

This week provides an opportunity to check-in and ask questions about your assessment. Attendance at the seminar is recommended but not compulsory. Please bring your questions to the seminar. We will meet at the usual time but may finish early.

Week 13

(25 May - 31 May)

Seminar

Challenges and Opportunities

This concluding seminar summarises lessons from the course and includes discussion of the marketplace for applied work in Australia and some professional and commercial considerations involved in building a successful career outside the University.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Policies and procedures

University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:

Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.