Skip to menu Skip to content Skip to footer
Course profile

Advanced Architectural Design: Masterclass (ARCH7007)

Study period
Sem 2 2025
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person

Course overview

Study period
Semester 2, 2025 (28/07/2025 - 22/11/2025)
Study level
Postgraduate Coursework
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person
Units
4
Administrative campus
St Lucia
Coordinating unit
Architecture, Design and Planning School

Students in this course engage critically and intensively with the distinctive formal commitments, theoretical position and modus operandi of a leading practitioner or practice or visiting academic. Their example is used as a springboard for advancing new directions in which students can formulate and demonstrate a related but independent position responsive to their own time, place and culture. Studio activities are typically conducted in an intensive mode to enable significant national and international guests to lead the studio and may be held off campus.

ARCH7007 is an Advanced Architectural Design course where students creatively respond to a specific scenario involving future social, cultural and/or environmental challenges. Students will be led by a leading external practitioner or visiting academic, to build skills of independent critical thinking and test intellectual ideas through a designᅠproposal. In addition to extending competence in previously acquired design knowledge and skills, ARCH7007 provides an introduction to research-based design of the built environment in relation to issues in contemporary practice. Students will be divided into studio units of 30 students or less.ᅠEach studio will be directed by a Studio Principal and supported by an Assistant.ᅠStudio Principals will set their own projects to achieve learning objectives within common assessment criteria. ARCH7007 also develops knowledge of design research; analysis of technical and theoretical options; integration of design strategies into an effective whole; communication in a professional context; critical self-reflection and experimentation; and how the engagement of ideas in design works as a process through exploration of, or reflection on, a specific architectural or urban design theme. Knowledge acquired in this exploration or reflection is applied to the design of a complex project.

Semester 2, 2025 ᅠDesign Studio topic: Towards Inclusive, Intergenerational, and Productive Urban Districts – Designing a Cultural Precinct for Salisbury

This Masters level Architectural Design masterclass studio explores how strategic land use planning and design innovation can transform urban areas where current or proposed land uses are no longer appropriate, sustainable, or aligned with emerging needs. The studio challenges students to rethink how underutilised, overlooked, or partially developed locations—including those with legacy industrial uses, infrastructural remnants, or low-intensity land occupation—can be reimagined to support more resilient, inclusive, and community-driven urban outcomes.

Rather than proposing wholesale redevelopment, students will explore how existing land use can be critically assessed and reimagined to support climate resilience, intergenerational inclusion, health, and productive urbanism. This includes introducing adaptable and socially responsive programmes such as clean industries, hybrid or mixed-use development, community-based facilities, and adaptive reuse. Opportunities for interaction between different demographic groups will also be explored, as will neighbourhood models that support social resilience and inclusive participation. Using site observation studies and data-informed analysis, students will test evidence-based design strategies that address typological innovation, land use change, development feasibility, infrastructure, energy systems, and mobility adopting scenario-based planning approaches.

Studio Theme:

Designing a Cultural Precinct for Salisbury

This studio specifically explores the potential of arts and culture as catalysts for urban regeneration. Focusing on Salisbury, a historically industrial suburb in Brisbane, students will investigate how a cultural precinct can support community identity, economic development, and urban vibrancy. The studio will engage with local stakeholders and urban designers to develop scenario-based design strategies that integrate cultural production, public space, and creative industries. The deliverables will include graphical reports containing comprehensive urban analysis, spatial planning and design recommendations, along with written documentation including a Strategic Urban Design Framework.

Course requirements

Assumed background

A Bachelor of Architectural Design or equivalent with either a GPA of 4.5 or above, or a GPA of 4.0 with 6 months post graduate full-time experience to the satisfaction of the Executive Dean.

Prerequisites

You'll need to complete the following courses before enrolling in this one:

Admission to the MArch.

Restrictions

MArch students only. Study Abroad students must seek Head of School permission to enrol. Summer Semester offering subject to Permission by Head of School.

Course contact

Course staff

Lecturer

Mr James Pearce

Timetable

The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.

Aims and outcomes

This course aims to extend students’ ability to develop imaginative and critical design proposals in response to contemporary issues and practice in the built environment.

Learning outcomes

After successfully completing this course you should be able to:

LO1.

Argue an independent and defensible architectural position.

LO2.

Deploy a reflective and research-driven design process.

LO3.

Integrate contemporary architectural technology, practice and discourse in the design of a complex architectural project.

LO4.

Communicate the experiential qualities and detailed resolution of an architectural proposal across a range of scales and at exhibition standard.

Assessment

Assessment summary

Category Assessment task Weight Due date
Paper/ Report/ Annotation, Product/ Design, Project Report 1: Urban Analysis and Community Oriented Development Strategies
  • Identity Verified
40%

Digital submission 2/09/2025 4:00 pm

Presentations in class 3/09/2025 9:00 am

Paper/ Report/ Annotation, Product/ Design, Project Report 2: Urban Design and Implementation Plan
  • Hurdle
  • Identity Verified
60%

Digital Submission 28/10/2025 4:00 pm

Presentations in class 29/10/2025 9:00 am

A hurdle is an assessment requirement that must be satisfied in order to receive a specific grade for the course. Check the assessment details for more information about hurdle requirements.

Assessment details

Report 1: Urban Analysis and Community Oriented Development Strategies

  • Identity Verified
Mode
Product/ Artefact/ Multimedia
Category
Paper/ Report/ Annotation, Product/ Design, Project
Weight
40%
Due date

Digital submission 2/09/2025 4:00 pm

Presentations in class 3/09/2025 9:00 am

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L04

Task description

Assessment rationale:

Students will undertake research and analysis activities in teams to identify, select and analyse the chosen precinct through sustainability and inclusion 'lens'. The report will propose a set of urban development scenarios and design strategies that can be taken forward for the precinct in the second stage of the project.

The output will be an individual report that can incorporate team research and analysis. The report should clearly identify the contributions of team members to the report and presentation.

Use of AI and MT: This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance. A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.

Submission guidelines

The School of Architecture, Design and Planning uses Blackboard and Turnitin for assessment submission. Turnitin is accessed through the course Blackboard site. Turnitin also checks for plagiarism or instances where the original work of others is not appropriately acknowledged.  

Students are advised to commence assignment uploads with sufficient amount of time (consider possible technical problems with computers, internet speed, etc). After successfully submitting an assignment through Turnitin, a ‘Submission Complete!’ screen will be displayed. It is the student’s responsibility to check assignment preview and confirm successful submission. If the ‘Submission Complete!’ screen isn’t displayed, the student should regard the submission as unsuccessful. Students should download a copy of the digital receipt as proof they have submitted the assignment. Students who are experiencing upload issues must advise the Course Coordinator immediately by email and should include screenshots and a copy of the assessment for submission.

To meet professional accreditation, public engagement and quality assurance obligations, digital copies of all course assessment items must be submitted in addition to any hard copy submission requirements specified in individual Course / Studio Outlines. Any physical models should be photographed and a minimum of two photographs describing the complete and full model must be included in the digital submission.  

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 14 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

If a student wishes to apply for an extension, they must apply online on or before the assignment due date. When possible, it is suggested that requests are submitted 2 business days prior to the submission due date for the assignment to allow processing time. Students with outstanding applications for extensions are advised to submit their assessment by the original due date, irrespective of whether the work is complete, so that what has been done can be graded. The maximum extension limit for assessment items in all design studio courses is 14 days.

Critique panels cannot be reconvened for the presentation component of assessment when an extension has been approved. Students with granted extensions (or pending extension applications) are able to attend but are not permitted to participate in the design review.

Late submission

The late penalty for this assessment item will be calculated as follows: 

First 1-hour block - initial 1 hour grace period no penalty.

Second 1-hour block - An penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item will be deducted

Third 1-hour block - An additional penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item will be deducted. (adding up to a total penalty of 20% of the maximum possible mark)

Any submissions received after three hours will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each one-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due. 

Report 2: Urban Design and Implementation Plan

  • Hurdle
  • Identity Verified
Mode
Product/ Artefact/ Multimedia
Category
Paper/ Report/ Annotation, Product/ Design, Project
Weight
60%
Due date

Digital Submission 28/10/2025 4:00 pm

Presentations in class 29/10/2025 9:00 am

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L04

Task description

Assessment Rationale:

Working individually, students are to develop an urban design and development strategy and an implementation plan for their selected suburban area/precinct, which pursues the community-making agendas that have been identified, researched and developed during the semester.

Students are to advance their own ideas on the overall precinct character including adaptation and reuse of existing built form and any new interventions and programmed external space functions to thew precinct. The required components of the Strategic Urban Design Framework will be presented and discussed in studio.

Use of AI or MT: This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance. A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.

Hurdle requirements

A hurdle is an assessment requirement that must be satisfied to receive a specific grade in the course. 'Report 2: Urban Design and Implementation Plan' is designated as a Hurdle in this course. This means a minimum achievement of 50% (a grade of 4) is required for this assessment item in order to pass the course. Meeting the hurdle requirement for a course does not guarantee a passing grade for the course and in order to pass this course, students also need to achieve a minimum grade of 4 overall.

Submission guidelines

The School of Architecture, Design and Planning uses Blackboard and Turnitin for assessment submission. Turnitin is accessed through the course Blackboard site. Turnitin also checks for plagiarism or instances where the original work of others is not appropriately acknowledged.  

Students are advised to commence assignment uploads with sufficient amount of time (consider possible technical problems with computers, internet speed, etc). After successfully submitting an assignment through Turnitin, a ‘Submission Complete!’ screen will be displayed. It is the student’s responsibility to check assignment preview and confirm successful submission. If the ‘Submission Complete!’ screen isn’t displayed, the student should regard the submission as unsuccessful. Students should download a copy of the digital receipt as proof they have submitted the assignment. Students who are experiencing upload issues must advise the Course Coordinator immediately by email and should include screenshots and a copy of the assessment for submission.

To meet professional accreditation, public engagement and quality assurance obligations, digital copies of all course assessment items must be submitted in addition to any hard copy submission requirements specified in individual Course / Studio Outlines. Any physical models should be photographed and a minimum of two photographs describing the complete and full model must be included in the digital submission. 

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 14 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

If a student wishes to apply for an extension, they must apply online on or before the assignment due date. When possible, it is suggested that requests are submitted 2 business days prior to the submission due date for the assignment to allow processing time. Students with outstanding applications for extensions are advised to submit their assessment by the original due date, irrespective of whether the work is complete, so that what has been done can be graded. The maximum extension limit for assessment items in all design studio courses is 14 days.

Critique panels cannot be reconvened for the presentation component of assessment when an extension has been approved. Students with granted extensions (or pending extension applications) are able to attend but are not permitted to participate in the design review.

Late submission

The late penalty for this assessment item will be calculated as follows: 

First 1-hour block - initial 1 hour grace period no penalty.

Second 1-hour block - An penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item will be deducted

Third 1-hour block - An additional penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item will be deducted. (adding up to a total penalty of 20% of the maximum possible mark)

Any submissions received after three hours will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each one-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due. 

Course grading

Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.

Grade Cut off Percent Description
1 (Low Fail) 0 - 24

Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

2 (Fail) 25 - 44

Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

3 (Marginal Fail) 45 - 49

Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes

4 (Pass) 50 - 64

Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes.

5 (Credit) 65 - 74

Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes.

6 (Distinction) 75 - 84

Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes.

7 (High Distinction) 85 - 100

Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Additional course grading information

Identity verified assessment (IVA) -ᅠArchitectural Design Courses

Architectural Design Courses require the cumulative integration of critical reflection and feedback on original creative ideas in an iterative process of project work developed over time in the studio context. To meet assessment validity and integrity obligations in Architectural Design Courses, students must regularly present and discuss their work with staff over the course of scheduled studio learning activities including lectures, structured studio activities, workshops, individual and group consultations, presentations and critiques. Students are expected to participate in at least 80% of scheduled studio activities in which the progress of their work is intended to be monitored and reviewed. If participation in such activities falls below 80% students may be requested to submit process work (such as drawings, models and design exegesis). If a student is not able to provide evidence of authorship to the satisfaction of the course coordinator, or if their participation falls below 50%, a maximum grade of 3 will be awarded.

Supplementary assessment

Supplementary assessment is not available for this course.

Supplementary assessment will not be offered in Architectural Design courses to any student with a failing grade of 3 or less. Due to the need for the cumulative integration of critical reflection and feedback on original creative ideas in an iterative process of project work development over time.

Learning resources

You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.

Library resources

Library resources are available on the UQ Library website.

Learning activities

The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.

Filter activity type by

Please select
Clear filters
Learning period Activity type Topic
Multiple weeks

From Week 1 To Week 13
(28 Jul - 02 Nov)

Lecture

Lectures

The course will include lectures presenting knowledge on urban development and design by academic staff and invited guests. Lectures will be held in conjunction with studio sessions. A schedule will be advised at the beginning of semester, but may be revised from week to week. Any adjustments to the schedule will be advised via Blackboard.

Week 1: Introduction and overview (Populous) + Urban & Cultural Contexts (Guest: Brisbane City Council Cultural Planner) Creative Economies & Placemaking

Week 2: Site Immersion and Visit (Guest: Food Connect Shed, Salisbury)

Week 3: No Class

Week 4: Scenario Planning & Visioning

Week 5: Pre-submission workshop – Feedback & Peer Review sessions

Week 6: Report 1 – Submission and Presentation

Week 7: Precedents & Practice: Cultural Precincts Worldwide

Week 8: Strategic Urban Design: Visualisation, Framing & Report making

Week 9: Pre-Interim Reviews Workshop - Feedback & Peer Review sessions

Week 10: Interim Reviews – Draft Strategic Framework

Week 11: Design Development Workshop 1 - Improving Structure & Communication

Week 12: Design Development Workshop 2 – Final Refinement & Integration

Week 13: Report 2 – Submission and Presentation

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03

Studio

Studio Sessions

The course will include regular studio sessions to support project-based learning, guide students, and provide feedback on the development of their projects. Studio sessions may involve group discussion, individual consultation, and presentation of work-in-progress. Students are expected to attend studio sessions each week unless advised otherwise. Agendas for each studio session will be advised via Blackboard.

Week 1: Introduction and overview (Populous) + Urban & Cultural Contexts (Guest: Brisbane City Council Cultural Planner) Creative Economies & Placemaking

Week 2: Site Immersion and Visit (Guest: Food Connect Shed, Salisbury)

Week 3: No Class

Week 4: Scenario Planning & Visioning

Week 5: Pre-submission workshop – Feedback & Peer Review sessions

Week 6: Report 1 – Submission and Presentation

Week 7: Precedents & Practice: Cultural Precincts Worldwide

Week 8: Strategic Urban Design: Visualisation, Framing & Report making

Week 9: Pre-Interim Reviews Workshop - Feedback & Peer Review sessions

Week 10: Interim Reviews – Draft Strategic Framework

Week 11: Design Development Workshop 1 - Improving Structure & Communication

Week 12: Design Development Workshop 2 – Final Refinement & Integration

Week 13: Report 2 – Submission and Presentation

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04

Policies and procedures

University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:

Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.