Skip to menu Skip to content Skip to footer
Course profile

Research Lab: History & Heritage (ARCH7084)

Study period
Sem 1 2025
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person

Course overview

Study period
Semester 1, 2025 (24/02/2025 - 21/06/2025)
Study level
Postgraduate Coursework
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person
Units
2
Administrative campus
St Lucia
Coordinating unit
Architecture, Design and Planning School

This course focuses on the uses and understanding of built environments constructed in the past, how we can learn from them and manage their on-going lives. The course introduces theoretical and methodological issues of historiography such as forms of analysis, argument and evidence; and research practices such archival research and oral history; the collecting and maintaining of archives of architecture; and Digital Humanities techniques such as 3-d scanning, data analysis, and visualisation. The course includes a critical understanding of the principles and statutory regulation of cultural heritage. Students will employ the learning in a researching, documenting and analysing a building, persons or institutions, or ideas

ARCH7084 is one of four Research Labs offered in the Master of Architecture program. Each Research Lab offers an exploration of the theoretical and methodological aspects of a particular sub-discipline within architectural research. Students will learn specific content through a series of seminars or lectures, and then develop a research project based on the theories and methods specific to this sub-discipline area.ᅠThe project students develop in a Research Lab can be extended into theᅠARCH7063 Research: Thesis course.

ARCH7084 Research Lab: History and Heritage introduces architectural history and heritage approaches, theories and methods, and asks students to undertake a recording and/or analysis of an historic or heritage place to produce a research report or essay, utilising those theories and frameworks.

Course requirements

Restrictions

MArch and MUrbDevDes students only.

Course contact

Course staff

Lecturer

Timetable

The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.

Additional timetable information

Please note this course will be scheduled at the UQ City Campus in Queen Street.

Aims and outcomes

This course aims to extend students' understanding of research methods in the practice of heritage in relation to the built environment.

Learning outcomes

After successfully completing this course you should be able to:

LO1.

Conduct a critical review of academic literature relevant to researching a building, building type, architect or other historical actor, or architectural concept.

LO2.

Apply an appropriate historiographic and/or heritage strategy in undertaking the research.

LO3.

Analyse primary research findings and their relation of the relevant secondary literature. Consider the presentation of research findings as an aspect of cultural heritage significance and/or evidence for an argument or description of architectural history.

LO4.

Undertake a largely self-directed research project and complete an essay or report to a professional standard.

Assessment

Assessment summary

Category Assessment task Weight Due date
Examination In class exam
  • Hurdle
  • Identity Verified
30% IVAH

25/03/2025

Essay/ Critique, Presentation, Project Essay/Report Plan 10%

Presentation in class 13/05/2025 9:00 am

Submission 13/05/2025 2:00 pm

Essay/ Critique, Project Essay/Report 60%

17/06/2025 2:00 pm

A hurdle is an assessment requirement that must be satisfied in order to receive a specific grade for the course. Check the assessment details for more information about hurdle requirements.

Assessment details

In class exam

  • Hurdle
  • Identity Verified
Mode
Written
Category
Examination
Weight
30% IVAH
Due date

25/03/2025

Task description

Assessment Rationale:

In the class exam, testing understanding of essential concepts and terms introduced in the first four weeks.

In-person assessment not permitting use of AI or MT: This assessment task is to be completed in-person. The use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Translation (MT) tools will not be permitted. Any attempted use of AI or MT may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.

Hurdle requirements

A hurdle is an assessment requirement that must be satisfied to receive a specific grade in the course. This assessment item is designated as a Hurdle in this course. This means a minimum achievement of 50% (a grade of 4) is required for this assessment item in order to pass the course. Meeting the hurdle requirement for a course does not guarantee a passing grade for the course and in order to pass this course, students also need to achieve a minimum grade of 4 overall.

Exam details

Planning time 10 minutes
Duration 90 minutes
Calculator options

No calculators permitted

Open/closed book Closed Book examination - no written materials permitted
Exam platform Paper based
Invigilation

Invigilated in person

Submission guidelines

Deferral or extension

You may be able to defer this exam.

Late submission

Exams submitted after the end of the submission time will incur a late penalty.

Essay/Report Plan

Mode
Oral, Written
Category
Essay/ Critique, Presentation, Project
Weight
10%
Due date

Presentation in class 13/05/2025 9:00 am

Submission 13/05/2025 2:00 pm

Task description

Assessment Rationale:

A plan for the major assignment submitted as presentation of three slides, with in-person presentation in class. The presentation is uploaded for marking. Attendance in person is a requirement. This is an independently completed task (i.e. not done in collaboration with class colleagues).

Complex / authentic assessment using AI and/or MT to support learning: This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance. A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools. 

Submission guidelines

The School of Architecture, Design and Planning uses Blackboard and Turnitin for assessment submission. Turnitin is accessed through the course Blackboard site. Turnitin also checks for plagiarism or instances where the original work of others is not appropriately acknowledged. Uploaded files must contain readable text and not be rasterised. Students are advised to commence assignment uploads with sufficient amount of time (consider possible technical problems with computers, internet speed, etc). After successfully submitting an assignment through Turnitin, a ‘Submission Complete!’ screen will be displayed. It is the student’s responsibility to check assignment preview and confirm successful submission. If the ‘Submission Complete!’ screen isn’t displayed, the student should regard the submission as unsuccessful. Students should download a copy of the digital receipt as proof they have submitted the assignment. Students who are experiencing upload issues must advise the Course Coordinator immediately by email and should include screenshots and a copy of the assessment for submission. To meet professional accreditation, public engagement and quality assurance obligations, digital copies of all course assessment items must be submitted in addition to any hard copy submission requirements specified in individual Course / Studio Outlines. Any physical models should be photographed and a minimum of two photographs describing the complete and full model must be included in the digital submission. 

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

If a student wishes to apply for an extension, they must apply online on or before the assignment due date. When possible, it is suggested that requests are submitted 2 business days prior to the submission due date for the assignment to allow processing time. Students with outstanding applications for extensions are advised to submit their assessment by the original due date, irrespective of whether the work is complete, so that what has been done can be graded.

Late submission

The late penalty for this assessment item will be calculated as follows: 

First 1-hour block - initial 1 hour grace period no penalty.

Second 1-hour block - An penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item will be deducted

Third 1-hour block - An additional penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item will be deducted. (adding up to a total penalty of 20% of the maximum possible mark)

Any submissions received after three hours will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each one-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due.

Essay/Report

Mode
Product/ Artefact/ Multimedia, Written
Category
Essay/ Critique, Project
Weight
60%
Due date

17/06/2025 2:00 pm

Task description

Assessment Rationale:

Individual Essay or Report interpreting or discussing research findings. This is an independently completed task. Typically an essay will be 3000-4000 words. A report may be fewer words depending on other data presented such as building documentation, modelling, archiving.

Complex / authentic assessment using AI and/or MT to support learning: This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance. A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.

Submission guidelines

The School of Architecture, Design and Planning uses Blackboard and Turnitin for assessment submission. Turnitin is accessed through the course Blackboard site. Turnitin also checks for plagiarism or instances where the original work of others is not appropriately acknowledged. Uploaded files must contain readable text and not be rasterised. Students are advised to commence assignment uploads with sufficient amount of time (consider possible technical problems with computers, internet speed, etc). After successfully submitting an assignment through Turnitin, a ‘Submission Complete!’ screen will be displayed. It is the student’s responsibility to check assignment preview and confirm successful submission. If the ‘Submission Complete!’ screen isn’t displayed, the student should regard the submission as unsuccessful. Students should download a copy of the digital receipt as proof they have submitted the assignment. Students who are experiencing upload issues must advise the Course Coordinator immediately by email and should include screenshots and a copy of the assessment for submission. To meet professional accreditation, public engagement and quality assurance obligations, digital copies of all course assessment items must be submitted in addition to any hard copy submission requirements specified in individual Course / Studio Outlines. Any physical models should be photographed and a minimum of two photographs describing the complete and full model must be included in the digital submission. 

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

If a student wishes to apply for an extension, they must apply online on or before the assignment due date. When possible, it is suggested that requests are submitted 2 business days prior to the submission due date for the assignment to allow processing time. Students with outstanding applications for extensions are advised to submit their assessment by the original due date, irrespective of whether the work is complete, so that what has been done can be graded.

Late submission

The late penalty for this assessment item will be calculated as follows: 

First 1-hour block - initial 1 hour grace period no penalty.

Second 1-hour block - An penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item will be deducted

Third 1-hour block - An additional penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item will be deducted. (adding up to a total penalty of 20% of the maximum possible mark)

Any submissions received after three hours will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each one-hour block is recorded from the time the submission is due

Course grading

Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.

Grade Cut off Percent Description
1 (Low Fail) 0 - 24

Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

2 (Fail) 25 - 44

Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

3 (Marginal Fail) 45 - 49

Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes

4 (Pass) 50 - 64

Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes.

5 (Credit) 65 - 74

Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes.

6 (Distinction) 75 - 84

Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes.

7 (High Distinction) 85 - 100

Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Additional course grading information

Identity verified assessment with a hurdle (IVAH) 

To meet assessment validity and integrity obligations, this course includes at least one piece of individual Identity Verified Assessment with a Hurdle (IVAH) that is unambiguously completed by that student, and in which a minimum level of achievement is reached. IVAH assessment item(s) contribute at least 30% towards the final grade. Examples of IVAH items include any activity in which a student’s individual performance is directly monitored, such as performances, fieldwork, oral assessment (including design critiques), design studio project work and invigilated exams. In order to pass this course students must achieve a minimum grade for the IVAH designated assessment item(s) as stated in the Assessment Task Description in the ECP.

Supplementary assessment

Supplementary assessment is available for this course.

Supplementary assessment may not be available for all courses, or for some of the assessment items for a course.

Learning resources

You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.

Library resources

Find the required and recommended resources for this course on the UQ Library website.

Learning activities

The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.

Filter activity type by

Please select
Clear filters
Learning period Activity type Topic
Fieldwork

Site Visit - Newstead House

Conservation Management Plan, material conservation

Multiple weeks

From Week 1 To Week 12
(24 Feb - 25 May)

Workshop

Workshop

Each week we will have a lecture/information session, plus discussion of reading, projects and student work. Please plan to come for the full three hours to enable all these activities to occur. More information in Blackboard.


Additional learning activity information

Confirmation and details of the Newstead House visit will occur once semester commences.

Policies and procedures

University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:

Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.