Course overview
- Study period
- Semester 1, 2025 (24/02/2025 - 21/06/2025)
- Study level
- Undergraduate
- Location
- St Lucia
- Attendance mode
- In Person
- Units
- 2
- Administrative campus
- St Lucia
- Coordinating unit
- Communication & Arts School
ENGL2405 builds on the introduction to literary texts and the skills of close reading that you've received in the first-year course, ENGL1800. In ENGL2405 we start to explore some more general ideas about how literary texts work: how they're constructed, what they do, the questions they raise, how they circulate and function, and the ways in which they're cultural and social phenomena. ENGL2405 will familiarize you with some of the main themes, thinkers, and currents of literary criticism and theory, and give you scope in your research essay to explore issues of particular interest to you. It will also enrich any of the second-level courses you choose to do, and prepare you for the major's third-level options and Honours study.
In your first-level courses in English Literature, you have been developing skills of close reading and using these to analyse a range of literary works from various eras and places.
In this course we take a slightly different approach to English Literature: we start thinking critically about the discipline itself.ᅠ This course poses eight questions that are integral to thinking about literature, and concludes with a brief survey of some major critical approaches to literature. The selected readings provides some ways that literary theory and criticism have answered these questions. They are not definitive answers, but rather starting points for you to formulate your own answers and to expand your understanding of literary texts and literary criticism as a practice.
Seminars operate as workshops: using your skills of close reading on these theoretical and critical texts, we place them in conjunction with literary texts to see how they work together. Workshops encourage you to debate a range of topics. And you also get to read some great literary works along the way. By course end, you will be more self-reflexive and insightful about what it means to read, write, and study literature.
Course requirements
Assumed background
If you are studying for a single or extended major in English Literature, then we very strongly recommend that, in order to get the best experience of ENGL2405 and what it offers, you:
- take ENGL2405 only after you've completed at least all the first-level courses you need for the major. English Extension atᅠhigh school is notᅠin any way a substitute for this.
- take ENGL2405 before you start on the third-level courses.
If you are not studying for a single or extended major in English Literature, we recommend that you:
- take ENGL2405 only once you've completed the prerequisite #4 of Arts courses; and
- consider making the English Literature core course ENGL1800 (Literary Classics: Texts and Traditions) as one of these.
ENGL2405 assumes that:
- You are able to write in clear and precise English.ᅠ If you're not sure of how to write clear academic English, or if you just want a refresher, we recommend that you consider doing ᅠWRIT1005ᅠ(Fundamentals of Academic Writing).
- You are familiar with presenting assignments in MLA style, 9th edition.ᅠ For details of MLAᅠstyle, see the Library's "How To" guide, at http://www.library.uq.edu.auᅠᅠ : Explore UQ Library: Help:ᅠ Referencing Style Guides
Prerequisites
You'll need to complete the following courses before enrolling in this one:
ENGL1800 (Literary Classics: Texts and Traditions) or ENGL1500 (Contemporary Literature: Reading and Writing).
Course staff
Course coordinator
Lecturer
Tutor
Timetable
The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.
Additional timetable information
Whilst every effort is made to place students in their preferred activity, it is not always possible for a student to be enrolled in their tutorial of choice. If you require assistance, please ensure that you email timetabling.commarts@enquire.uq.edu.au from your UQ student email with:
- Your name
- Your student ID
- The course code
- A list of three tutorial preferences (in order of preference)
- Reason for the change – e.g. timetable clash, elite athlete status, SAP
Teaching staff do not have access to change tutorials or help with timetables; all timetabling changes must be processed through the Timetabling Team.
Aims and outcomes
ENGL2405 aims to:
- provide a critical insight into the operations of literary criticism, literary texts, and literature as an institution;
- introduce students to some key theoretical works of literary studies;
- provide students with a basic ability to apply literary theory and criticism to the reading of literary works;
- improve reading skills of critical and theoretical texts;
- improve oral and written argumentation skills; and
- encourage behaviours that make you more employable, namely, attending workshops regularly, producing work in a timely fashion, persevering with learning new and challenging material, and valuing a work ethic.
In addition, as a course in the single and extended majors in English Literature, ENGL2405 seeks to:
- build on the knowledge of literary texts and the skills of reading them that have been developed in the first-level courses of the major, and in particular ENGL1800;
- echo and comment on issues that arise throughout the second-level courses in the major, without requiring students to have done any particular one of them;
- prepare students for the critical thought and ways of dealing with the critical literature that will be developed further in the third-level courses.
Learning outcomes
After successfully completing this course you should be able to:
LO1.
read critical and theoretical texts closely, building on skills you have learnt from your study of literary texts;
LO2.
understand some of the ways in which literary (and other) texts can be conceptualised;
LO3.
understand some of the complex relations between literary texts and critical or theoretical texts;
LO4.
understand some of the complex relations literary texts have to the cultures in which they're produced, circulated and read;
LO5.
show a knowledge of some of the significant issues in literary criticism and theory;
LO6.
have a first-hand acquaintance with some of the key writings and figures associated with those issues;
LO7.
be able to use these skills and knowledges in your own critical analyses of literary texts;
LO8.
show developed interpretive, analytical, and communication skills; and
LO9.
understand and use conventions for the professional and scholarly presentation of documents.
LO10.
better apply yourself to challenging tasks and ideas, and to work consistently at these tasks.
Assessment
Assessment summary
Category | Assessment task | Weight | Due date |
---|---|---|---|
Participation/ Student contribution | Seminar Preparation, Writing, and Participation | 15% |
24/02/2025 - 18/04/2025 |
Essay/ Critique | Critical Essay | 45% 2000 words (incl. quotations) |
24/04/2025
Submit via TurnItIn through Blackboard |
Examination |
Final Examination
|
40% |
End of Semester Exam Period 7/06/2025 - 21/06/2025 |
Assessment details
Seminar Preparation, Writing, and Participation
- Mode
- Oral, Written
- Category
- Participation/ Student contribution
- Weight
- 15%
- Due date
24/02/2025 - 18/04/2025
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L05, L06
Task description
There are 12 weeks of class in the semester, with two seminars per week. From weeks 1 to 13 (excluding the reading week) you will be given 1 mark (equals 1 percentage point) for each week that you:
1. are prepared for (that is, you have done the readings and brought these to the seminar). These will be checked.
2. attend and participate for the entirety of both seminars (so turning up on time and staying until the finish), and
3. submit a writing task of passable standard to your tutor via the link found in the week's "Resources" folder on Blackboard before the first class of each week. For the writing task you write a response to a question based on that week's readings. The question will be provided on the course Blackboard site under 'Learning Resources--week X' from 5pm, the Friday before the relevant teaching week. Responses should be 100 words in length (plus or minus 10%), and are marked on a pass/fail basis.
Rationale:
Consistent preparation and participation lead to better learning outcomes and more productive and enjoyable seminars. Moreover, the three components of this assessment item--as detailed below--are basic to being students of literature, and as general skills are required by many workplaces. In addition, the ability to write on a set topic and within a short time frame are valuable academic and vocational skills--the more you write, the easier it becomes. Finally, this assessment item provides tutors (and yourself) with early feedback if you are having difficulties with course readings.
Writing tasks will be returned with basic feedback e.g "pass", "fail" Students who fail a week should meet with their tutor.
This assessment task is to be completed in-person. The use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Translation (MT) tools will not be permitted. Any attempted use of AI or MT may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
Submission guidelines
Submit a writing task of passable standard to your tutor via the link found in the week's "Resources" folder on Blackboard before the first class of each week.
Deferral or extension
You cannot defer or apply for an extension for this assessment.
Please note: this is a class assessment item and students are NOT able to apply for an extension via the Unitask portal. Please contact your course coordinator directly to see if alternative arrangements are available.
Critical Essay
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Essay/ Critique
- Weight
- 45% 2000 words (incl. quotations)
- Due date
24/04/2025
Submit via TurnItIn through Blackboard
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07, L08, L09
Task description
Write a 2000-2200 word (excluding quotations) research-based critical essay on one of the following topics based on Module One. This task encourages you to explore in more detail a topic you find particularly interesting, and requires you to show your understanding of the topic.
You need to construct an argument based on material covered in the first module of the course and from your research. To expand your ideas and understanding use a minimum of four critical scholarly sources. Two of these sources can be course readings from List A, excluding Carter and Coetzee. The other two sources must not be from the Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism or List A texts.
Scholarly sources can be an academic monograph, book chapter, or academic journal article. Some topics may need non-scholarly sources. These are not counted towards the critical sources.
Depending on the topic, you may use one or two literary works as evidence, though these cannot be counted as critical sources. These literary works must be required reading on either ENGL1800 or ENGL1500 only (any year from 2015 to present). Note that the focus of your essay is the topic's theoretical or critical issue. You are not to write a conventional literary critical essay in which you provide a reading of a literary work, unless the topic specifies this. Even then, the focus will be on exploring a particular theoretical or critical framework to perform a reading.
The essay must be correctly formatted using MLA 9th edition referencing and presentation style.
Rationale:
This assessment task requires you to:
- perform literary studies research so that you enounter, understand, and integrate scholarship relevant to your topic;
- think critically about the material covered in the first module and synthesise an argument based on this material and your research;
- write an analytical essay that demonstrates your understanding of the topic and the first module; and
- present a written document that adheres to professional standards of presentation (namely, MLA format) and written expression.
Submission:
TurnItIn Receipts:
- Assignments for this course will be submitted electronically via Blackboard and using TurnItIn. Before submitting any assignments for this course you must ensure you have completed UQ's compulsory online Academic Integrity Tutorial.
- When you successfully submit your assessment to TurnItIn you will see text confirming your submission is complete, before being redirected to your Assignment inbox. On this page you can:
- View the name of the submitted file
- View date and time of the upload
- Resubmit your paper (if necessary)
- Download your submitted paper
- Download digital receipt.
- If you cannot see your submission in your Assignment inbox you should regard your submission as unsuccessful. Students are responsible for retaining evidence of submission by the due date for all assessment items, in the required form (e.g. screenshot, email, photo, and an unaltered copy of submitted work).
- If the submission was not successful:
- Note the error message (preferably take a screenshot).
- Go to your assignment page and see if it is possible to submit again.
- If you cannot submit again email your course coordinator immediately with the assignment attached.
- Please visit this webpage for further advice on how to submit your TurnItIn assignment.
Integrity Pledge
Assignments for this course will be submitted electronically via Blackboard and using Turnitin. Before submitting any assignments for this course, you must ensure you have completed UQ's compulsory online Academic Integrity Tutorial.
In uploading an assignment via Turnitin you are certifying that it is your original work, that it has not been copied in whole or part from another person or source except where this is properly acknowledged, and that it has not in whole or part been previously submitted for assessment in any other course at this or any other university.
Withholding marks prior to finalisation of grades
Per the Assessment Judgements section of the Assessment Procedures:ᅠ
Results for all summative assessment items are to be made available to individual students through the eLearning Management System on completion of marking, with the exception of the final assessment item which is to be released only after the final grade for the course has been released
This assessment task evaluates students' abilities, skills and knowledge without the aid of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Translation (MT). Students are advised that the use of AI or MT technologies to develop responses is strictly prohibited and may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
Submission guidelines
TurnItIn Receipts:
Assignments for this course will be submitted electronically via Blackboard and using TurnItIn. Before submitting any assignments for this course you must ensure you have completed UQ's compulsory online Academic Integrity Tutorial.
When you successfully submit your assessment to TurnItIn you will see text confirming your submission is complete, before being redirected to your Assignment inbox. On this page you can:
- View the name of the submitted file
- View date and time of the upload
- Resubmit your paper (if necessary)
- Download your submitted paper
- Download digital receipt.
If you cannot see your submission in your Assignment inbox you should regard your submission as unsuccessful. Students are responsible for retaining evidence of submission by the due date for all assessment items, in the required form (e.g. screenshot, email, photo, and an unaltered copy of submitted work).
If the submission was not successful:
- Note the error message (preferably take a screenshot).
- Go to your assignment page and see if it is possible to submit again.
- If you cannot submit again email your course coordinator immediately with the assignment attached.
Please visit this webpage for further advice on how to submit your TurnItIn assignment.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Final Examination
- In-person
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Examination
- Weight
- 40%
- Due date
End of Semester Exam Period
7/06/2025 - 21/06/2025
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03, L05, L06, L07, L08
Task description
This in-person final examination will cover the second module of the course, though you may find it useful to include material discussed in module one in your essays.
Rationale:
This exam examines your understanding of the required readings and theoretical approaches in Module Two, textual analysis abilities, writing skills, and ability to relate the readings to literary texts under exam conditions. It is also an identity-invigilated form of assessment.
Format:
- 120 minutes 10 minutes perusal.
- The examination has four questions requiring you to write a short essay in response. Each essay is worth 10 marks (or 10 per cent of your marks for the course). Answer all questions. Write your answers in the supplied answer booklet.
- Specified materials permitted: Written materials only: you will be able to take into the examination room one A4, single-sided, single-spaced, typed or handwritten page of notes, in minimum 10 point font.
- Essay topics may include textual analysis of a supplied passage.
- Suggested length for each essay: between 600-750 words in length, including quotations.
- You can make reference to any of the relevant required readings from List A in your essays, and ensure you quote from the creative text if part of the essay topic.
- No other secondary source (e.g other critical readings of texts) is required.
- Avoid lengthy quotations. Use sentences, paragraphs, a logical arrangement of ideas, formal essay structure (an introduction, body, and conclusion), and correct spelling. Marks will be deducted for incorrect length and errors in written expression.
- A practice exam will be made available on Blackboard after the mid-semester break.
This assessment task is to be completed in-person. The use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Translation (MT) tools will not be permitted. Any attempted use of AI or MT may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
Exam details
Planning time | 10 minutes |
---|---|
Duration | 120 minutes |
Calculator options | No calculators permitted |
Open/closed book | Closed Book examination - specified written materials permitted |
Materials | One A4 sheet of handwritten or typed notes, single sided, is permitted |
Exam platform | Paper based |
Invigilation | Invigilated in person |
Submission guidelines
Deferral or extension
You may be able to defer this exam.
Course grading
Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.
Grade | Cut off Percent | Description |
---|---|---|
1 (Low Fail) | 0 - 24 |
Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. |
2 (Fail) | 25 - 44 |
Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. |
3 (Marginal Fail) | 45 - 49 |
Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes |
4 (Pass) | 50 - 64 |
Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes. |
5 (Credit) | 65 - 74 |
Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes. |
6 (Distinction) | 75 - 84 |
Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes. |
7 (High Distinction) | 85 - 100 |
Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes. |
Additional course grading information
- Where fractional marks occur in the calculation of the final grade, a mark of x.5% or greater will be rounded up to (x+1)%. A percentage mark of less than x.5% will be rounded down to x%.
- Where no assessable work is received, a Grade of X will apply.
Supplementary assessment
Supplementary assessment is available for this course.
Additional assessment information
- Referencing Style: Essays in English and English Literature submitted to the School of Communication and Artsᅠmust use the MLA (Modern Language Association) referencing style.ᅠ
- Further information regarding the assessment, including marking criteria and/or marking rubrics are available in the ‘Assessment’ folder in Blackboard for this course.
- Marks Cannot Be Changed After Being Released: Marks are not open to negotiation with course staff. If you wish to discuss the feedback you have received, you should make an appointment to speak with the Course Coordinator.
- Assessment Re-mark: If you are considering an Assessment Re-mark, please follow the link to important information you should consider before submitting a request.
- Integrity Pledge: Assignments for this course will be submitted electronically via Blackboard and using Turnitin. Before submitting any assignments for this course, you must ensure you have completed UQ's compulsory online Academic Integrity Modules.ᅠIn uploading an assignment via Turnitin you are certifying that it is your original work, that it has not been copied in whole or part from another person or source except where this is properly acknowledged, and that it has not in whole or part been previously submitted for assessment in any other course at this or any other university.
- Withholding marks prior to finalisation of grades: Per UQ Assessment Procedures – Release of Assessment Item Marks and Grades: The final assessment item and the marks for the assessment item are to be released only after the final grade for the course has been released.
Learning resources
You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.
Library resources
Find the required and recommended resources for this course on the UQ Library website.
Own copy required
You'll need to have your own copy of the following reading resources. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.
Item | Description |
---|---|
Book |
Foe
by Coetzee; J. M. - 1987 Publisher: Penguin Books ISBN: 9781925774870; 9780140299533; 9780140110326; 9780140096231; 9781524705497; 9788439729624 |
Book |
The bloody chamber and other stories
by Carter; Angela - 1995 Publisher: Vintage ISBN: 9780099588115; 9781409015369 |
Book |
The Norton anthology of theory and criticism
by Leitch; Vincent B.; Cain; William E.; Finke; Laurie; McGowan; John; Sharpley-Whiting; T. Denean - 2018 Edition: Third edition Publisher: W.W. Norton & Company ISBN: 9780393602951 |
Additional learning resources information
WEEKLY READING LIST:
NB: Both List A and List B texts are compulsory reading and print copies should be brought to the relevant class. Using print copies keeps pagination consistent and helps us avoid social media distraction.
The Norton Anthology refers to the Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism, 3rd edition, unless otherwise noted.
Suggestions for further reading are provided. These are not compulsory and will not be examined. They allow you to pursue topics of particular interest and to encounter other ways of thinking about the particular topic.
MODULE ONE: SOME CRITICAL QUESTIONS
- Begin reading J.M. Coetzee, Foe and Angela Carter, The Bloody Chamber and Other Stories. Aim to have these read ASAP.
Week 1: What is Literature? (Which leads us to some other questions, including “What is Literary Value?”)
Required Reading:
List A:
- Bourdieu, Pierre. From “Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.” Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism, edited by Vincent B. Leitch et al, WW Norton & Co, 2018, pp. 1586-92. ᅠᅠ
- Bloom, Harold. “Preface and Prelude.” The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages, Riverhead Books, 1995, pp. 1-11. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
- Leavis, Frank Raymond (F.R) . From The Great Tradition: George Eliot, Henry James, Joseph Conrad, Norton Anthology, pp.1052-1057.
- Williams, Raymond. “Literature.” Keywords, Flamingo, 1987, pp. 183-188. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
List B:
- ENGL1800 2023 Course Reading List (Available via blackboard)
Further Reading:
- Herrnstein Smith, Barbara. “Contingencies of Value.”ᅠ Norton Anthology.
- Hume, David. “Of the Standard of Taste.” Norton Anthology.ᅠ
- Kant, Immanuel. “Critique of the Power of Judgement.” Norton Anthology.
Week 2: What is Literary Criticism?
Required Reading:
List A:
- Hayles, N. Katherine. "How We Read: Close, Hyper, Machine." Norton Anthology, pp. 2071-2094.
- Crowe Ransom, John. “Criticism Inc.” Norton Anthology, 2010, pp. 901-911.
- Kolodny, Annette. “Dancing through the Minefield: Some Observations on the Theory, Practice, and Politics of a Feminist Literary Criticism.” Norton Anthology, 2nd edition, pp. 2048-66. (Available via Library Course Reading List).
List B:
- Anne Sexton, “After Auschwitz.” The Complete Poems, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1981, pp. 432-433. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
Further Reading:
- Bhabha, Homi.K. ”The Commitment to Theory.” Norton Anthology.
- Christian, Barbara. “The Race for Theory.” Norton Anthology.
- Graff, Gerald. “Taking Cover in Coverage.” Norton Anthology.
- Pater, Walter. From ”Studies in the History of the Renaissance.” Norton Anthology.
- Smith, Barbara. “Toward a Black Feminist Criticism.” Norton Anthology.
Week 3: What is it to be an Author?
Required Reading:
List A:
- Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Norton Anthology, pp. 1268-72.
- Coetzee, J. M. Foe.
- Foucault, Michel. “What is an Author?” Norton Anthology, pp. 1394-1404; p.1408-1409.
List B:
- Four "anonymous" poems (Available via blackboard)
Further Reading:
- Sartre, Jean Paul.ᅠ From “What is Literature? (Why Write?)” Norton Anthology.
- Woolf, Virginia. “A Room of One’s Own.” Norton Anthology.ᅠ
Week 4: How do We Read Literary Texts, and Why?
Required Reading:
List A:
- Coetzee, J. M.ᅠ Foe.
- Fish, Stanley. From Is There a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Norton Anthology, pp. 1898-1909.
- Iser, Wolfgang.ᅠ “Interaction between Text and Reader.” Norton Anthology, pp. 1452-1460.
List B:
- Angela Carter. “The Snow Child.” The Bloody Chamber, Vintage Books, pp. 105-106.
- ---. "Wolf-Alice. "The Bloody Chamber, Vintage Books, pp. 140-49.
Further Reading:
- Sartre, Jean Paul. “What is Literature?” Norton Anthology.
- Jauss, Hans Robert. “Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory.” Norton Anthology.
Week 5: What is Literary Language, and How does it Work?
Required Reading:
List A:
- Bakhtin, Mikhail M. From “Discourse in the Novel.” Norton Anthology. pp.1011-1014; pp.1018-1030.
- Carter, Angela. The Bloody Chamber and Other Stories, Vintage Books.
- Coetzee, J. M. Foe.
- Shklovsky, Viktor “Art as Technique.” ᅠRussian Formalist Criticism, edited by Lee T. Lemon and Marion J. Reis, U of Nebraska, 1965, pp. 15-29. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
List B:
- Bukowski, Charles. “Hell is a Lonely Place.”ᅠ The Pleasures of the Damned, edited by John Martin, Canongate, 2007, pp. 111-113. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
- Cummings, E. E. “O Sweet Spontaneous.” Complete Poems: 1904-1962, edited by George J. Firmage, Liveright, 1994, pp. 58. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
- --- “ygUDUH.” Complete Poems: 1904-1962, pp. 547. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
- Wordsworth, William. “Daffodils.” Romanticism: An Anthology, pp. 558. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
Further Reading:
- Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. “Biographia Literaria.” Norton Anthology.
- Heidegger, Martin. “Language.” Norton Anthology.
- Jakobson, Roman. From “Linguistics and Poetics.” Norton Anthology.
- --- “Two Aspects of Language of Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances.” Norton Anthology.
Week 6: Where do Literary Texts Come from? The Heavens? The Imagination? Somewhere Else?
Required Reading:
List A:
- Barthes, Roland. “From Work to Text.” Norton Anthology, 2010. pp.1277-1282.
- Freud, Sigmund. From “The Interpretation of Dreams”. Norton Anthology. pp.789-799.
- Williams, Raymond. “Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory.” Norton Anthology. pp.1337-1350.
List B:
- Carter, Angela. “The Werewolf.” The Bloody Chamber, pp. 126-28.ᅠ
- --- “The Erl-King.” The Bloody Chamber, pp. 96-104.ᅠ
Further Reading:
- Bloom, Harold. From “The Anxiety of Influence.” Norton Anthology.
- Elliot, T. S. “The Metaphysical Poets.” Norton Anthology.ᅠ
- Freud, Sigmund. From “The Uncanny.” Norton Anthology.
- Howe, Irving. “History and the Novel.” Norton Anthology.
- Kristeva, Julia. Norton. From “Revolution in Poetic Language.” Norton Anthology.
- Lacan, Jacques. “ The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience.” Norton Anthology.
Week 7: What does it mean to say that Literature is an Institution?
Required Reading:
List A:
- Eagleton, Terry. From “Literary Theory: An Introduction. Chapter 1. The Rise of English.” Norton Anthology, pp. 2015-2021.
- Thiong’o, Ngũgĩ wa; Taban Lo Liyong; and Henry Owyor-Anyumba. “On the Abolition of the English Department.”ᅠ Norton Anthology, pp. 1912-1916.
List B:
- Forrest, Stephanie. “The Fall of Literature.” IPA Review, 2014, pp.43-45. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
- Lamond, Julieanne. “Franklin vs Miles: Women Writers and Literary Value in Australia.” Meanjin, 70.3, 2011, pp. 32-39. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
Further Reading:
- Fanon, Frantz. “The Wretched of the Earth.” Norton Anthology.
- Gilbert, Sandra M. and Susan Gubar. From The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Norton Anthology.
- Graff, Gerald.ᅠ “Taking Cover in Coverage.” Norton Anthology.
- Ohmann, Richard. From “The Shaping of the Canon: U.S Fiction 1960—1975.” Norton Anthology.
- Williams, Raymond. Norton. “Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory.” Norton Anthology.
- Woolf, Virginia. “A Room of One’s Own.” Norton Anthology.
Week 8: Does Literature have anything to do with Politics?
Required Reading:
List A:
- Cixous, H←l│ne. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Norton Anthology, pp. 1869-1876.ᅠ
- Coetzee, J. M. Foe.
- Nussbaum, Martha C. From “Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education.” Norton Anthology, pp. 2138-2150.
- Said, Edward. From “ Orientalism.” Norton Anthology, pp.1783-1790; p.1795.
List B:
- Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. “Kubla Khan.” Romanticism: An Anthology, edited by Duncan Wu, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, pp. 641-643. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
Further Reading:
- Althusser, Louis. From “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation.” Norton Anthology.ᅠ
- Gates (Junior), Henry Louis. “Talking Black: Critical Signs of the Times.” Norton Anthology.
- Howe, Irving. “History and the Novel.” Norton Anthology.
- Williams, Raymond. “Base and Superstructure on Marxist Cultural Theory.” Norton Anthology.ᅠ
MODULE TWO: CRITICAL APPROACHES
Week 9: Critical Approaches: Feminism
Required Reading:
List A:
- Carter, Angela. “The Lady of the House of Love.” The Bloody Chamber, pp. 107-25.ᅠ
- ---. “The Werewolf.” The Bloody Chamber, pp. 126-28.
- Duncker, Patricia. “Re-imagining the Fairy Tales: Angela Carter’s Bloody Chambers.” Literature and History, vol.10, no.1, 1984, pp. 3-14. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
Week 11: Critical Approaches: Psychoanalysis
Required Reading:
List A:
- Carter, Angela. "Wolf-Alice." The Bloody Chamber, pp. 140-49.
- ---. "The Erl King." The Bloody Chamber, pp.96-104.
- ᅠJennings, Kristine. “Moonlit Mirrors, Bloody Chambers, and Tender Wolves: Identity and Sexuality in Angela Carter’s 'Wolf-Alice'.” Studies in the Literary Imagination, vol.47, no.1, 2014, pp. 89-110. (Available via Library Course Reading List)ᅠ
Week 12: Critical Approaches: Postcolonialism
Required Reading:
List A:
- J. M Coetzee, Foe.
- Roberts, Sheila. "'Post-colonialism, or the House of Friday'--J.M. Coetzee's Foe." World Literature Written in English, vol.31, no.1, 1991, pp.87-92. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
Week 13: Critical Approaches: Marxism
Required Reading:
List A:
- Carter, Angela. "The Bloody Chamber." The Bloody Chamber, pp. 1-42.
- Harrison, Tony. "Heredity."ᅠ In Selected Poems. London: Penguin, 1987, p.111. (Available via Library Course Reading List).
- Harrison, Tony. "Marked with D."ᅠ In Selected Poems, London: Penguin, 1987, p.155. (Available via Library Course Reading List).
- Harrison, Tony. "Wordlists."ᅠ In Selected Poems. London: Penguin, 1987, p.117-19. (Available via Library Course Reading List).
- Harrison, Tony. "Classics Society."ᅠ In Selected Poems. London: Penguin, 1987, p.120. (Available via Library Course Reading List).
- Regan, Christine.ᅠ "The Politics of Sentiment in Tony Harrison's The School of Eloquence." Critical Survey, vol. 30, no.4 (2018): pp.54-66. (Available via Library Course Reading List)
Learning activities
The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.
Filter activity type by
Please select
Learning period | Activity type | Topic |
---|---|---|
Week 1 (24 Feb - 02 Mar) |
Seminar |
Week 1 What is Literature? (And what is Literary Value?) Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L05, L06, L08, L10 |
Week 2 (03 Mar - 09 Mar) |
Seminar |
Week 2 What is Literary Criticism? Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07, L08, L10 |
Week 3 (10 Mar - 16 Mar) |
Seminar |
Week 3 What is it to be an Author? Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07, L08, L10 |
Week 4 (17 Mar - 23 Mar) |
Seminar |
Week 4 How Do We Read Literary Texts, and Why? Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07, L08, L10 |
Week 5 (24 Mar - 30 Mar) |
Seminar |
Week 5 What is Literary Language, and How Does it Work? Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07, L08, L10 |
Week 6 (31 Mar - 06 Apr) |
Seminar |
Week 6 Where Do Literary Texts Come From? The Heavens? The Imagination? Somewhere Else? Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07, L08, L10 |
Week 7 (07 Apr - 13 Apr) |
Seminar |
Week 7 What Does it Mean to Say that Literature is an Institution? Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L08, L10 |
Week 8 (14 Apr - 20 Apr) |
Seminar |
Week 8 Does Literature Have Anything to Do with Politics? Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07, L08, L10 |
Mid-sem break (21 Apr - 27 Apr) |
No student involvement (Breaks, information) |
Mid-semester Break - No Class |
Week 9 (28 Apr - 04 May) |
Seminar |
Week 9 Some Critical Approaches to Literature: Feminism Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07, L08, L10 |
Week 10 (05 May - 11 May) |
Seminar |
Week 10 Reading week. No classes. |
Week 11 (12 May - 18 May) |
Seminar |
Week 11 Some Critical Approaches to Literature: Psychoanalysis Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07, L08, L10 |
Week 12 (19 May - 25 May) |
Seminar |
Week 12 Some Critical Approaches to Literature: Postcolonial Studies Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07, L08, L10 |
Week 13 (26 May - 01 Jun) |
Seminar |
Week 13 Some Critical Approaches to Literature: Marxism Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06, L07, L08, L10 |
Policies and procedures
University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:
- Student Code of Conduct Policy
- Student Integrity and Misconduct Policy and Procedure
- Assessment Procedure
- Examinations Procedure
- Reasonable Adjustments - Students Policy and Procedure
Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.
Course guidelines
Communication Expectations
While you are a student at UQ, all communication must be conducted according to the UQ Student Code of Conduct. The UQ Library has a helpful Communicate and collaborate online module.
- Email is the primary way for you to send messages to, and receive information from, the School and our staff.
- You must use your UQ email address (not a private address) to communicate with staff.
- You should add a clear subject line, including course code, and a 2-3 word statement.
- You can send email at any time, however please do not expect responses outside normal working hours (Monday to Friday from ~8am to ~5pm).
- Emails that constitute bullying, harassment or discrimination against staff contravene the Student Code of Conduct. Emails like this will be reported to the University, and the matter will be pursued as misconduct.