Course overview
- Study period
- Semester 1, 2025 (24/02/2025 - 21/06/2025)
- Study level
- Undergraduate
- Location
- St Lucia
- Attendance mode
- In Person
- Units
- 2
- Administrative campus
- St Lucia
- Coordinating unit
- Historical & Philosophical Inq
GEND1010 offers an introduction to key concepts, approaches and methodologies for Gender Studies, and the use of these for the reading of various media, journalistic, film and literary texts.
What is gender and why does it matter? How do we experience it? How do we understand it? Why does it have such influence on the ways our lives and bodies are organised and performed? Drawing on queer and feminist theory,ᅠand engaging with disciplines across the humanities and social sciences, GEND1010 provides an introduction to the conceptᅠof genderᅠin history, in theory, and inᅠeveryday life. We consider how the abstract ideas of gender have very real and significant impacts on our experience and understanding of the world around us.ᅠWe will examine and unravel our understandingᅠof what having or embodying a gender means, to better understand the influence ofᅠfeminist praxis, biological determinism and categories of sexual difference, social constructionism,ᅠthe notion of the "other", gender normativity and queering practices, power and inequality, and intersectionality. Taking a 'personal is political' approach, the course exploresᅠthe changing social, political and cultural performativies of gender and the possibilities for change that a critical awareness of gender creates.
Course requirements
Assumed background
No background in Gender Studies or Women's Studies is assumed for this course.
Incompatible
You can't enrol in this course if you've already completed the following:
GEND1000, WOMS1000
Course contact
Lecturer
Timetable
The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.
Aims and outcomes
The course aims to explore and introduce students to key terms, conceptsᅠand approaches in Gender Studies that enable us to better understand complex gendering practices in Australian and other societies, historically and today. The course aims to provide you with importantᅠtheoretical, conceptual and practical tools with which to begin thinking about gender and the ways in which our everyday lives are gendered. The course as a whole isᅠbuilt around the threeᅠimportant concepts of knowing, being and doing in relation to gender and we ask students to explore their gendered selves, their gendered worlds, and the ways in which Gender Studies can make a difference.
Gender Studies is a discipline that actively strives for gender justice, and this course aims to make space for you to consider the implications of power, privilege and personal positioning for effecting social change and transformation. Theoretically grounded within feminism, critical and queer studies,ᅠwe aim to encourage students to consider the power and possibilities you have to make a difference in relation to gender equity and justice. We ask you throughout the course to continually reflect upon your 'personal is political' positioning in relation to gender and through interaction with course staff and guest lecturers, we encourage you to critique, question, and discuss what gender means and might come to mean.
Learning outcomes
After successfully completing this course you should be able to:
LO1.
Demonstrate an awareness of the key historical and contemporary terms, concepts and debates which inform how we come to understand gender.
LO2.
Understand how gender interacts with other social constructions and hierarchies (e.g. sexuality, race, ethnicity, class) in historical, contemporary, intercultural, local and global contexts.
LO3.
Explore, analyse and reflect upon various social, political and cultural practices, texts and institutions as gendered and gendering.
LO4.
Demonstrate an ability to use the critical methodologies of gender, feminist, sexuality and queer studies and scholarship to analyse how gender constructions shape the actual conditions of the individual and collective lives of ourselves and others.
LO5.
Apply theory to practical experience for social transformation in relation to gender constructions and gender justice.
Assessment
Assessment summary
Category | Assessment task | Weight | Due date |
---|---|---|---|
Participation/ Student contribution | Tutorial Participation | 10% |
3/03/2025 - 19/05/2025
Weeks 2 - 12 |
Quiz | In-Class Quiz | 20% |
24/03/2025
Undertaken in Week 5 Tutorials. |
Essay/ Critique | Research Essay | 40% 2000 words |
2/05/2025 2:00 pm |
Essay/ Critique | Take Home Exam | 30% 1000 words |
30/05/2025 2:00 pm |
Assessment details
Tutorial Participation
- Mode
- Activity/ Performance
- Category
- Participation/ Student contribution
- Weight
- 10%
- Due date
3/03/2025 - 19/05/2025
Weeks 2 - 12
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03
Task description
The participation mark will be determined by considering a student’s overall participation in the tutorial series. The quality of a student’s contribution (not mere frequency of attendance) will be the main criteria.
To ensure you do well in tutorials you should always:
- Do the readings.
- Think about the broader implications of the topic in terms of theory and real-world applications.
- Contribute to discussions meaningfully.
- Engage respectfully with others.
Submission guidelines
Deferral or extension
You cannot defer or apply for an extension for this assessment.
In-Class Quiz
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Quiz
- Weight
- 20%
- Due date
24/03/2025
Undertaken in Week 5 Tutorials.
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03, L04, L05
Task description
Students will undertake an in-class quiz during their Week 5 Tutorials. The quiz will take the form of short answers to questions about gender theory from content presented in the lectures and tutorials. The quiz is worth 20% of your overall semester mark. Further advice about the quiz will be provided in class. If you are unable to attend the tutorial during Week 5, you will need to supply a medical certificate or cite an SAP, and apply for a deferred quiz.
The goal of this assessment is to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of at least one scholar’s ideas or philosophies to help you integrate gender theory into your research essays.
AI: This assessment task evaluates the student's abilities, skills and knowledge without the aid of artificial intelligence (AI). Students are advised that the use of AI technologies to develop responses is strictly prohibited and may constitute student misconduct under under the Student Code of Conduct.
Submission guidelines
Undertaken in Week 5 Tutorials.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to defer this exam.
Late submission
Quizzes cannot be handed in late.
Research Essay
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Essay/ Critique
- Weight
- 40% 2000 words
- Due date
2/05/2025 2:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03, L04, L05
Task description
You will write a research essay responding to one of the essay questions/topics that will be made available on Blackboard early in the semester. Essay questions/topics will relate to the weekly lecture topics and the key concepts, themes, and theoretical perspectives from the course, but will be focused on a piece of popular culture or media.
You may write using first person perspective in your essays and pay attention to the argument that you are making when answering the question. In your analysis of the question, make sure you engage with and reference the relevant course material including weekly readings from relevant theorists. Make sure your essay has a clear and logical structure and that your argument and analysis flows from your introduction to conclusion. Detailed marking criteria will be available on Blackboard and we will discuss the expectations around the research essay format in classes throughout the semester and in the Essay Writing Workshop. You should include at least 10 scholarly sources.
Referencing Syle: Students may choose whichever referencing style they are comfortable with, as long as it remains consistent with the UQ Library style guide: https://guides.library.uq.edu.au/referencing.
Word Limits: A final word count that is within ±10% of the set length (2000 words) is acceptable. Word count does not include footnotes; however, discursive footnotes are included in the word count. A word count that is outside these 10% will receive a proportionate penalty and will be graded against the grading criteria.
AI: This assessment task evaluates the student's abilities, skills and knowledge without the aid of artificial intelligence (AI). Students are advised that the use of AI technologies to develop responses is strictly prohibited and may constitute student misconduct under under the Student Code of Conduct.
Submission guidelines
Submit via Turnitin on Blackboard (Assessment Folder).
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Take Home Exam
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Essay/ Critique
- Weight
- 30% 1000 words
- Due date
30/05/2025 2:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03, L04, L05
Task description
Full instructions and details of the exam task will be made available on the date of release. The purpose of the take home exam is to identify the basic knowledge you have acquired and your grasp of the broader themes from the course.
You will be provided the details of the task on Monday during the Week 13 Lecture and will be required to submit your exam by 2:00pm on Friday of Week 13, meaning you will have Monday through to Friday to complete. The exam is compulsory, and as it is replicating exam conditions, late submissions will not be accepted without a formal extension.
Referencing Syle: Students may choose whichever referencing style they are comfortable with, as long as it remains consistent with the UQ Library style guide: https://guides.library.uq.edu.au/referencing.
Word Limits: A final word count that is within ±10% of the set length (1000 words) is acceptable. Word count does not include footnotes; however, discursive footnotes are included in the word count. A word count that is outside these 10% will receive a proportionate penalty and will be graded against the grading criteria.
AI: This assessment task evaluates the student's abilities, skills and knowledge without the aid of artificial intelligence (AI). Students are advised that the use of AI technologies to develop responses is strictly prohibited and may constitute student misconduct under under the Student Code of Conduct.
Submission guidelines
Submit via Turnitin on Blackboard (Assessment Folder).
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Course grading
Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.
Grade | Cut off Percent | Description |
---|---|---|
1 (Low Fail) | 0 - 24 |
Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 1, Low Fail (0-24%), is generally awarded in cases where some assessment has been submitted, but it is of wholly unsatisfactory standard or quantity. In work submitted, however, there is no demonstrated evidence of understanding of the concepts of the field of study or basic requirements of the course. |
2 (Fail) | 25 - 44 |
Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 2, Fail (25-44%), is generally awarded to work that exhibits deficiencies in understanding and applying the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study, and as such, does not satisfy the basic requirements of the course. Often, one or more major items of assessment will not have been completed. |
3 (Marginal Fail) | 45 - 49 |
Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes Course grade description: Grade 3, Marginal Fail (45-49%), is generally awarded if a student has submitted work that attempts to meet the knowledge and skill requirements of the course, but is only able to demonstrate a superficial understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course. Students will usually have attempted all major pieces of assessment and show that they have an identifiable, emerging ability to apply basic knowledge and skills. |
4 (Pass) | 50 - 64 |
Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 4, Pass (50-64%), is generally awarded where all major items of assessment have been submitted. An adequate knowledge of the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study should be demonstrated and a functional skill level achieved. |
5 (Credit) | 65 - 74 |
Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 5, Credit (65-74%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and a substantial understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study have been demonstrated. |
6 (Distinction) | 75 - 84 |
Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 6, Distinction (75-84%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and substantial knowledge of the deeper and more complex aspects of the course and field of study have been demonstrated. |
7 (High Distinction) | 85 - 100 |
Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 7, High Distinction (85-100%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and there is evidence that the deeper and more complex aspects of the course and field of study have been mastered. |
Additional course grading information
Tutorial Participation:
Your tutorial participation will be assessed according to the following criteria:
- Evidence of participation in discussions.
- Evidence of preparation for the tutorial, most notably through completing the set readings.
- Quality of contributions to discussions.
- Fostering of group discussions, through courteous and respectful interactions with staff and students.
- Attendance is necessary to fulfill the above criteria, as per the course requirements, but marks cannot be awarded for attendance alone.
To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your attendance will be flawless and your participation exceptional. This grade reflects exceptional levels of preparation, mastery of course materials, and very high quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions. You should be able to engage with your peers very effectively.
To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75-84) your attendance will be excellent and your participation very substantial. This grade reflects excellent levels of preparation, knowledge of course materials, and high quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions. You should be able to engage with your peers effectively.
To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%), your attendance and participation will be good. This grade reflects proficient levels of preparation, good knowledge of course materials, and good quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.
To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%) your attendance and participation will be satisfactory. This grade reflects adequate levels of preparation and knowledge of course materials, and an acceptable quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.
To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%) your attendance and participation will be unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation and superficial knowledge of course materials and basic levels of preparation. However, when in attendance, there is evidence of your ability to demonstrate developing achievement in contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.
To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your attendance and participation will be very unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation, minimal knowledge of course materials, little evidence of preparation, and mixed to low quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.
To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your attendance and participation will be unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation, an no evidence of preparation, and little or no evidence of quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.
In-Class Quiz:
Your quiz assessment task will be assessed according to the following criteria:
- Ability to produce a succinct response to a directed question.
- Knowledge of key themes, ideas or content.
- Ability to employ relevant terminology.
- Ability to write in clear English (where applicable).
Unlike formative assessment undertaken during your course (such as book reviews and essays), quiz answers are typically marked on right or wrong basis for multiple choice, single word and short answer questions. The overall grade achieved for a quiz is arrived at by totalling the marks for its constituent elements.
Research Essay:
Your essay will be assessed according to the following criteria:
- Ability to construct a well-reasoned argument.
- Depth and breadth of knowledge and understanding of central issues.
- Ability to form a well-structured essay.
- Engagement with academic sources and evidence.
- Insight and/or creativity in interpreting texts or constructing a point of view or argument.
- Capacity to produce a coherent and well-written essay using correct grammar and syntax.
- Appropriately referenced, as per discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your essay should reflect an exceptional level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have undertaken extensive, high-level research, that you are able to form a very rigorous, well-organised argument, and that your discussion is original and creative. It should also demonstrate that you are able to evaluate and organise data and/or evidence in a critical manner and that you have a sophisticated and insightful understanding of problems and issues. Your essay should be very well written, clear and concise, pay strict attention to discipline conventions and have minimal, if any errors in referencing, expression, grammar, spelling and punctuation.
To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75 – 84%), your essay should reflect an advanced level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have undertaken wide research, that you are able to form a rigorous, well-organised argument, and that your discussion is coherent and convincing. It should also demonstrate that you are able to evaluate data and/or evidence in a perceptive manner, and that your understanding of problems and issues is perceptive and insightful. Your essay should be well written, clear and concise, follow discipline conventions and have few errors in referencing, expression, grammar, spelling and punctuation.
To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%) your essay should reflect a proficient level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have undertaken the expected level of research, that you are able to develop or adapt convincing arguments and justify them adequately, that you are able to evaluate data and/or evidence in a proficient manner, and that you have a proficient understanding of problems and issues. The presentation and referencing of your essay will largely follow discipline conventions, perhaps have some errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation, and demonstrate your ability to communicate effectively.
To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%) your essay should reflect a functional level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you are able to apply fundamental concepts and skills, that you have undertaken a basic level of research and have the basic ability to evaluate data and/or evidence, to identify problems and issues, to offer insights and to develop routine arguments. Your organisation, writing, referencing, spelling and grammar will be adequate and use some of the discipline conventions to communicate appropriately.
To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%), your essay should reflect developing levels of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have a superficial knowledge of fundamental concepts and skills, that you have undertaken a basic level of research, made some attempt to evaluate data and/or evidence, to identify problems and issues, and to offer insights. Your arguments, while underdeveloped, show your emerging ability to apply knowledge and skills. Your organisation, writing, spelling and grammar will be adequate, perhaps poor, and your referencing and use of discipline conventions poor/and or inconsistent. Alternatively, your essay may, in part, be well written and suggest human engagement and achievement but (whether actually developed with the help of AI or not) will (a) mostly exhibit the stereotypical and/or superficial understanding characteristic of generative AI text and/or (b) mostly fail, in a manner characteristic of generative AI text, to develop a sustained (multi-layered) argument: This grade is assigned for a total (sum of all the assessment components) in the range 45-49%. See assessment components for specific grading criteria.
To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%) your essay will reflect deficiencies in skill acquisition and in your understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course. It will demonstrate that you have not undertaken adequate research, that you are unable to evaluate data and/or evidence, to identify problems and issues, or to offer insights adequately. Your arguments will be unsupported and/or inappropriate, your organisation and writing will be poor and/or inappropriate, and referencing and use of discipline conventions poor/and or inconsistent. Alternatively, your essay may suggest developing or higher achievement but (whether actually developed with the help of AI or not) will (a) exhibit the stereotypical and/or superficial understanding that is characteristic of generative AI text and/or (b) may fail to develop, in a way that is characteristic of generative AI text, a sustained (multi-layered) argument: This grade is assigned for a total (sum of all the assessment components) in the range 25-44%. See assessment components for specific grading criteria
To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your essay will reflect that you have failed to meet the minimum learning requirements and skill acquisition for this course. Your essay will demonstrate an absence of research, evaluation of data and/or evidence, and lack argumentation. Use of discipline conventions will be absent, poor or inappropriate, and written expression poor or inappropriate.
Take Home Exam:
Students will be assessed according to the following criteria:
- Ability to construct a well-reasoned argument.
- Evidence of understanding of central issues.
- Ability to form a well-structured essay.
- Engagement with academic sources and evidence, as required.
- Insight and/or creativity in interpreting texts or constructing a point of view or argument.
- Capacity to produce a coherent and well-written essay using correct grammar and syntax; appropriately referenced if required.
To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your take-home exam essay should demonstrate an exceptional level of rigour in argumentation and understanding of issues, exceptional organization of material, extensive research, and insightful and creative discussion. The written expression and presentation should be excellent and follow discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75-84%), your take-home exam essay should demonstrate an advanced level of rigour in argumentation and understanding of issues, very good organisation of material, wide research, and a capable synthesis of research materials. The written expression and presentation should be very good and follow discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%), your take-home exam essay should demonstrate a proficient level of rigour in argumentation and understanding of issues, good organization of material, a good level of research, and synthesis of research materials. The written expression and presentation should be good and largely follow discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%), your take-home exam essay should demonstrate a basic level argumentation, a fundamental understanding of issues, adequate organisation of material, a basic level of research, and an adequate synthesis of research materials. Your written expression and presentation should be satisfactory and follow discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%), your take-home exam essay will demonstrate that your attempt, while underdeveloped and falling short of a pass, shows your emerging ability to apply basic knowledge and skills. Your argumentation and understanding of issues will be superficial, your material poorly organised and synthesis of research materials limited. Your written expression and presentation should be adequate and should attempt to follow discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your take-home exam essay will demonstrate that your argumentation and understanding of issues was deficient, that your research was limited and/or poorly organised and explained, and that you did not understand fundamental aspects of the course. Your writing will be poor and/or inappropriate, and will not follow discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your take-home exam essay will demonstrate that you have failed to meet the minimum learning requirements and skill acquisition for this assessment task. You will not have mounted sound arguments and/or understood relevant issues. Your research will be limited and inadequately explained. Your essay will be poorly organised and/or poorly written, and will not follow discipline conventions.
Supplementary assessment
Supplementary assessment is available for this course.
Additional assessment information
- Failure to submit all major assessment items (those worth 15% and above) will result in a maximum grade of 2 (Fail).
- By submitting work through Turnitin you are deemed to have accepted the following declaration: ‘I certify that this assignment is my own work and has not been submitted, either previously or concurrently, in whole or in part, to this University or any other educational institution, for marking or assessment’.
- All students must ensure that they receive their Turnitin receipt on every submission of assessment items. YOU MUST CHECK THAT THE RECEIPT CONFIRMS THAT SUBMISSION HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL.
- A valid Turnitin receipt will be the only evidence accepted if assessments are missing.
- Without evidence, the assessment will receive the standard late penalty, or after 7 calendar days, will receive zero. In the case of a Blackboard outage, please contact the Course Coordinator as soon as possible so that they can confirm the outage with ITS.
- It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that they are submitting assessment items on a device that is capable of the task, and that appropriate internet bandwidth and speed is available. If you cannot be sure that your device or internet will enable you to complete or submit an assessment task, you must come onto campus and use one of the University Computers in the Library or Computer Labs.
- Plagiarism, and asking or paying someone else to do your work is cheating and constitutes academic misconduct. See ECP Section 6.1
- Feedback against the assessment criteria in the form of comments on your script will be provided through Turnitin or on your script directly.
- For information on assessment remarks see: https://my.uq.edu.au/information-and-services/manage-my-program/exams-and-assessment/querying-result
Learning resources
You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.
Library resources
Find the required and recommended resources for this course on the UQ Library website.
Learning activities
The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.
Filter activity type by
Please select
Learning period | Activity type | Topic |
---|---|---|
Week 1 (24 Feb - 02 Mar) |
Lecture |
Week 1: Why Gender Matters In our first lecture, we will unpack the history of gender. What is it? How do we experience it day to day? How has our understanding of it changed over the years? What can be gained from studying gender and its impacts? There will also be a brief overview of the course, assessment, and expectations. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 2 (03 Mar - 09 Mar) |
Lecture |
Week 2: Constructing Gender and the 'Other' This week we will consider how gender has been both constructed and questioned throughout history, culminating in an engagement with theorists such as Simone de Beauvoir and Luce Irigaray. We will confront and unpack binary categories, such as woman/man, self/other, subject/object, homosexual/heterosexual and examine the social pressures behind their construction and use. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Tutorial |
Week 2: Constructing Gender and the 'Other' Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
|
Week 3 (10 Mar - 16 Mar) |
Lecture |
Week 3: Troubling Gender In this lecture, we will think about the entangled relationships between how we perceive sex and gender in our own bodies, and the bodies of others, and how we can complicate or trouble these understandings. Butlerメs performativity theories will be brought into contact with more recent Queer Theory, to consider how queer and trans theorists have expanded on and further complicated these ideas. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Tutorial |
Week 3: Troubling Gender Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
|
Week 4 (17 Mar - 23 Mar) |
Lecture |
Week 4: Race and Gender In Week 4, we will look at the influence of race upon gender, and of gender upon race. Key theorists such as Audre Lorde, bell hooks, and Aileen Moreton-Robinson will guide our thinking on intersectionality to critique the hegemony of white feminism. We will discuss the ways that race, gender, and other identities produce entanglements that oppress or privilege particular bodies. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Tutorial |
Week 4: Race and Gender Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
|
Week 5 (24 Mar - 30 Mar) |
Lecture |
Week 5: Fashioning Gender This week's lecture will think deeply about fashion and dress, and the politics of gender. We will carefully examine cultural norms and assumptions we often take for granted when thinking about fashion. Through witnessing the dressed body as a site of social, cultural, and gendered construction, we are going to critically analyse the 'rules' of fashion and discuss clothing as a method of transgression. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Tutorial |
Week 5: Fashioning Gender Tutorial + In-Class Quiz Assessment. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
|
Week 6 (31 Mar - 06 Apr) |
Lecture |
Week 6: Indigenous Perspectives In this class we'll hear the crucial perspectives of First Nations women in relation to feminism and conceptualising gender, particularly the ways in which coloniality, whiteness and race intersect in complex ways with notions of gender in the past and in the present. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Tutorial |
Week 6: Indigenous Perspectives Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
|
Week 7 (07 Apr - 13 Apr) |
Lecture |
Week 7: Boys will be Boys This week we focus on recent trends and key questions in the field of masculinities. As well as presenting a summary of the key theories relating to masculinity studies, we will dispel common narratives supporting the idea that there is an oppositional relationship between masculinities and feminism, and contextualise the recent trends towards hyper-masculinity, and the pursuit of 'traditional' masculine values. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Tutorial |
Week 7: Boys Will Be Boys Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
|
Week 8 (14 Apr - 20 Apr) |
Lecture |
Week 8: Gender and Popular Culture Images, texts, and sounds via television, film, music, performances, magazines, comics, novels, games, fashion, and advertising all produce and represent a dominant set of beliefs and values about masculinity and femininity. In this lecture we explore the deep entanglement of gender and popular culture in the production and reproduction of gender norms and gendered subjects. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Tutorial |
Week 8: Essay Writing Workshop Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
|
Week 9 (28 Apr - 04 May) |
Lecture |
Week 9: Reproducing Gender In this lecture we will think about reproduction (and the possibility for reproduction) and how this has guided our treatment of bodies historically and today. Whose reproductive rights were privileged and who was denied these rights? We will examine the ways in which gendered norms about reproduction, motherhood, and non-reproduction might be disrupted. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Tutorial |
Week 9: Reproducing Gender Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
|
Week 10 (05 May - 11 May) |
No student involvement (Breaks, information) |
Week 10: No Classes No classes due to Labor Day Public Holiday. |
Week 11 (12 May - 18 May) |
Lecture |
Week 11: Gendering violence This week we will examine our cultural and judicial understandings of sexual and gendered violence. This vital lecture will consider the role of gender in constructing victim/perpetrator narratives that ultimately impact upon the perceived validity of sexual assault and sexual violence. We unpack ideas around consent, and review theories designed to overcome the threat of sexual harms in Australian society. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Tutorial |
Week 11: Gendering Violence Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
|
Week 12 (19 May - 25 May) |
Lecture |
Week 12: Gender and (Dis)Ability In this lecture we will consider the relationship between gender, ability, and disability. We will explore how experiences of disability are influenced by gender, sexuality, race, class, and age, and how this relates to medical and scientific hierarchies. We will think about how people with diverse gender identities experience disability, and what this can tell us about social constructions of bodies. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Tutorial |
Week 12: Gender and Disability Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
|
Week 13 (26 May - 01 Jun) |
Lecture |
Week 13: Gendered Futures In this lecture we reflect on the work of the past twelve weeks, and reassess our ideas of how we experience gender each day, and the way that gendered expectations and ideals inform our behaviour and outlook. As we look towards the future, how can we ensure gender experience and gender difference are adequately embraced and supported in our society? We approach the subject of gender justice, and imagine what a world without gendered norms could look like, and what steps we need to take to ensure a gender just world. Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Policies and procedures
University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:
- Student Code of Conduct Policy
- Student Integrity and Misconduct Policy and Procedure
- Assessment Procedure
- Examinations Procedure
- Reasonable Adjustments - Students Policy and Procedure
Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.