Course overview
- Study period
- Semester 2, 2025 (28/07/2025 - 22/11/2025)
- Study level
- Undergraduate
- Location
- St Lucia
- Attendance mode
- In Person
- Units
- 2
- Administrative campus
- St Lucia
- Coordinating unit
- Historical & Philosophical Inq
This course aims to provide insights about the complexities of gender, sexuality, class, race and ethnicity, and culture in the context of gender studies. The focus is on the implications of emancipatory discourses such as feminism(s), decoloniality, Indigenous standpoint theory and epistemologies as ways of re-imagining our intersectional bodies and the worlds in which we live. The readings and assessment items foreground critical perspectives, personal narratives, non-Western and Indigenous voices to enable students to work back and forth between the personal and the political, and consider how such forms of inquiry can be used to enact visions of social justice and new critical spaces for understanding.
Welcome to GEND2001! This interdisciplinary course engages with current questions and debates in gender studies around the intersectionality of gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, and class—particularly in relation to issues of Indigeneity, ethnicity, and colonialism. The course is loosely structured to explore local and global contexts of gendered intersectional experience and considers how these experiences play out in various times and places. In weekly lectures and tutorials, we explore the writings of feminist and gender theorists, thinkers, and philosophers together in conversation to consider the ways that our experience of gender, race, sexuality, class, and culture operate within and against movements towards gender justice. We will also consider the ways in which the personal becomes political, and the kinds of theoretical and practical moves that have been made relating to combating inequality and injustice.
Course requirements
Assumed background
GEND1010 in particular, and other Courses in the GS Minor are desirable preparation. If you have not done any of these, pleaseᅠdiscuss with the Course Coordinatorᅠwhether what you have done will equip you adequately. You will need some knowledge of GS theory/methodologies to do well in the Course.
Recommended prerequisites
We recommend completing the following courses before enrolling in this one:
GEND1000 or GEND1010, 6 units of Arts or Social Science courses
Course contact
Course staff
Lecturer
Timetable
The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.
Additional timetable information
Weekly classes will consist of a lecture (2 hours) and a discussion based tutorial (1 hour). Attendance to lectures/tutorials is expected and important for successful completion of your assessments.
Aims and outcomes
This course aims to provide you with a deeper understanding of the complexities of gender, sexuality, class, race and ethnicity,ᅠand culture in the context of gender studies. The weekly seminars focus on the implications of emancipatory discourses such as feminism(s), postcolonialism and decoloniality, Indigenous standpoint theory and epistemologiesᅠas ways of re-imagining our intersectional bodies and the worlds in which we live. The readings and assessment items foreground critical theory, personal narratives, non-Western and Indigenous voices to enable us to work back and forth between the personal and the political, and consider how such critical forms of inquiry can be used to enact visions of social justice andᅠfreedom from exploitation and oppression. In doing so, we hope to disrupt traditional forms of inquiry to imagine a new and critical space for understanding.
Assessment
Assessment summary
Category | Assessment task | Weight | Due date |
---|---|---|---|
Reflection |
Critical Reflections
|
20% 8 Critical Reflections worth 2.5% each |
6/08/2025 - 22/10/2025
Critical Reflections will be completed in class in Weeks 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12. |
Presentation | Podcast Episode | 40% 10-minute Podcast Episode |
26/09/2025 2:00 pm |
Examination |
Exam
|
40% |
End of Semester Exam Period 8/11/2025 - 22/11/2025 |
Assessment details
Critical Reflections
- In-person
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Reflection
- Weight
- 20% 8 Critical Reflections worth 2.5% each
- Due date
6/08/2025 - 22/10/2025
Critical Reflections will be completed in class in Weeks 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12.
Task description
In tutorials in Weeks 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, students will write eight short critical reflections in class. You will be required to write a short answer to the provided question, based on your understandings of the required readings, lectures, and tutorials. This will allow you to get some feedback on your ideas and spread out your workload throughout the semester. The questions will be given to you on a worksheet each week during your tutorial.
The best critical reflections will be thoughtful and analytical, rather than simply regurgitating the readings. You will need to address the question, rather than talking around the topic or simply summarising the readings. Your critical reflections must not be simply a summary of the weekly course material.
AI: This assessment task is to be completed in-person. The use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Translation (MT) tools will not be permitted. Any attempted use of AI or MT may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
Submission guidelines
A worksheet will be provided each week in class.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.
Late submission
You will receive a mark of 0 if this assessment is submitted late.
A medical certificate or reference to your SAP will be required if you miss class and fail to submit a Critical Reflection
Podcast Episode
- Mode
- Oral, Written
- Category
- Presentation
- Weight
- 40% 10-minute Podcast Episode
- Due date
26/09/2025 2:00 pm
Task description
You will need to produce a 10-minute podcast episode in response to a question provided. You will need to upload both a recorded version of the episode and a transcript to Turnitin.
The structure of your presentation will vary depending on your project, but you must include the following:
- The argument you are presenting in response to the assigned question.
- A clear and engaging description of the topic.
- Critical analysis of the topic and its implications for feminism and/or gender justice, including engagement with relevant theory/philosophical perspectives and concepts that we have explored in the course, particularly focusing on race, culture, or ethnicity.
- A justification of why this topic is important to learn about.
Since this is a Gender Studies course, not a media production course, the technical quality will not be a major criterion of assessment. However, please be as creative as you like, with music, sound effects, interviews etc.
Length Limits: A final length that is within ±10% of the set length (10 minutes) is acceptable. A final podcast length that is outside these 10% will receive a proportionate penalty and will be graded against the grading criteria.
AI: This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance. A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.
Submission guidelines
Submit via Turnitin on Blackboard (Assessment Folder).
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Exam
- In-person
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Examination
- Weight
- 40%
- Due date
End of Semester Exam Period
8/11/2025 - 22/11/2025
Task description
2-hour formal exam in the centrally administered examination period. Tips and recommended revision material for the exam will be offered towards the end of semester.
Exam details
Planning time | 10 minutes |
---|---|
Duration | 120 minutes |
Calculator options | No calculators permitted |
Open/closed book | Closed book examination - no written materials permitted |
Exam platform | Paper based |
Invigilation | Invigilated in person |
Submission guidelines
Deferral or extension
You may be able to defer this exam.
Apply online through My.UQ.
Course grading
Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.
Grade | Cut off Percent | Description |
---|---|---|
1 (Low Fail) | 0 - 24 |
Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. |
2 (Fail) | 25 - 44 |
Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. |
3 (Marginal Fail) | 45 - 49 |
Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes |
4 (Pass) | 50 - 64 |
Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes. |
5 (Credit) | 65 - 74 |
Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes. |
6 (Distinction) | 75 - 84 |
Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes. |
7 (High Distinction) | 85 - 100 |
Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes. |
Additional course grading information
ASSESSMENT MARKING CRITERIA
Tutorial Journal Assessment Criteria
Criteria:
- Ability to produce a succinct response to a directed question.
- Knowledge of key themes or ideas.
- Ability to employ relevant terminology, as required.
- Clear and concise written expression, well presented.
To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your journal should demonstrate exceptional levels of understanding and comprehension of the stated question, should locate it precisely and comprehensively in the relevant context, should be highly persuasive and clear in its critique. It should also demonstrate exceptional levels of insight and originality. Your answers will be very well written, clear and concise,
To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75-84%), your journal should demonstrate very high levels of understanding and comprehension of the stated question, should perceptively and capably locate it in the relevant context, should be persuasive and clear in its critique. It should also demonstrate advanced levels of insight and originality. Your answers will be well written, clear and concise.
To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%), your journal should demonstrate a fundamental understanding and comprehension of the stated question, should locate it proficiently in the relevant context and should offer a clear critique. It should also demonstrate good insight and originality. Your written expression will be clear and effective.
To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%), your journal should demonstrate a basic level of understanding and comprehension of the stated question, should be able to identify at least the relevant context to which it belongs, and should offer a functional and coherent critique. It should also demonstrate a basic level of insight and originality. Your written expression will be appropriate.
To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%), your journal will demonstrate that you have a superficial level of understanding and comprehension of the stated question. Your answer, while underdeveloped, will show your emerging ability to apply basic knowledge and skills. Your work will demonstrate only a superficial understanding of the relevant context to which it belongs; offer a basic but flawed critique, marred by poor insight and lack of originality. Your written expression will be adequate or poor.
To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your journal will demonstrate that you have a fundamentally flawed understanding and comprehension of the stated question and its context. You will have provided minimal critique with poor insight and originality. Your written expression will be poor or inconsistent.
To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your journal will demonstrate that you have failed to meet the minimum learning requirements and skill acquisition for this assessment task. There will be no evidence of understanding and comprehension of the stated question, or of the context. You will not have provided a coherent critique, used insight or originality. Your written expression will be poor or inappropriate.
Podcast Episode Assessment Criteria
Criteria:
- Communication of a well-reasoned argument.
- Demonstration of depth and breadth of knowledge and understanding of the central issues.
- Clarity of structure.
- Engagement with academic sources and evidence.
- Demonstration of insight and creativity into constructing a point of view or argument.
- Capacity to produce a coherent and clearly-spoken podcast.
- Appropriate referencing, as per discipline conventions, in an accompanying script.
To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your podcast should communicate an exceptionally well-reasoned argument, demonstrate a deep understanding of the central issues, be clearly structured, deeply engage with the academic sources and evidence, display great insight and creativity, be extremely coherent and clearly-spoken, and be flawlessly referenced according to discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75-84%) your podcast should communicate a very well-reasoned argument, demonstrate a strong understanding of the central issues, be very well structured, engage with the academic sources and evidence, display good insight and creativity, be highly coherent and clearly-spoken, and be very well referenced according to discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%), your podcast should communicate a well-reasoned argument, demonstrate an adequate understanding of the central issues, be sufficiently well structured, engage with the academic sources and evidence, display some insight and creativity, be coherent and clearly-spoken, and be well referenced according to discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%), your podcast should communicate an identifiable argument, demonstrate some understanding of the central issues, have a basic structure, demonstrate a basic level of engagement with the academic sources and evidence, display some insight and creativity, show basic coherency and be clearly-spoken, and be adequately referenced according to discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%), your podcast will have communicated a poorly-reasoned argument, have a weak understanding of the central issues, lack structure, demonstrated limited engagement with the academic sources and evidence, shown poor insight and creativity, lacked coherency and clear articulation, and failed to follow the basic discipline conventions on referencing.
To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your podcast will have communicated a very weak argument, demonstrated little understanding of the central issues, shown a severe lack of structure, shown little engagement with the academic sources and evidence, displayed little insight or creativity, is incoherent and poorly spoken, and will have major flaws in the referencing based on discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your podcast will have failed to communicate an argument, demonstrated no understanding of the central issues, lacked any structure, shown no engagement with the academic sources and evidence, displayed no insight or creativity, is incoherent and very poorly spoken, and the referencing will have failed to follow the basic disciplinary conventions.
Exam Assessment Criteria
Criteria:
- Ability to recognize key issues in the question.
- Ability to structure an argument.
- Use of evidence.
- Engagement with academic scholarship and/or debates.
- Clear and concise written expression, well presented.
Unlike formative assessments undertaken during your course (such as book reviews and essays), exam answers are typically marked on right or wrong basis for multiple choice, single word and short answer questions. Individual exam essays and other exam questions are not awarded grades, but are assessed numerically (such as a mark out of five, or a mark out of ten). The overall grade achieved for an exam is arrived at by totalling the marks for the constituent elements of the exam.
Supplementary assessment
Supplementary assessment is available for this course.
Additional assessment information
- Failure to submit all major assessment items (those worth 15% and above) will result in a maximum grade of 2 (Fail).
- By submitting work through Turnitin you are deemed to have accepted the following declaration: ‘I certify that this assignment is my own work and has not been submitted, either previously or concurrently, in whole or in part, to this University or any other educational institution, for marking or assessment’.
- All students must ensure that they receive their Turnitin receipt on every submission of assessment items. YOU MUST CHECK THAT THE RECEIPT CONFIRMS THAT SUBMISSION HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL.
- A valid Turnitin receipt will be the only evidence accepted if assessments are missing. Without evidence, the assessment will receive the standard late penalty, or after ten calendar days, will receive zero. In the case of a Blackboard outage, please contact the Course Coordinator as soon as possible so that they can confirm the outage with ITS.
- It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that they are submitting assessment items on a device that is capable of the task, and that appropriate internet bandwidth and speed is available. If you cannot be sure that your device or internet will enable you to complete or submit an assessment task, you must come onto campus and use one of the University Computers in the Library or Computer Labs.
- Plagiarism, and asking or paying someone else to do your work is cheating and constitutes academic misconduct. See ECP Section 6.1
- Feedback against the assessment criteria in the form of comments on your script will be provided through Turnitin or on your script directly.
- For information on assessment remarks see: https://my.uq.edu.au/information-and-services/manage-my-program/exams-and-assessment/querying-result
Learning resources
You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.
Library resources
Library resources are available on the UQ Library website.
Learning activities
The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.
Filter activity type by
Please select
Learning period | Activity type | Topic |
---|---|---|
Week 1 (28 Jul - 03 Aug) |
Lecture |
Week 1: Introduction In the first week of GEND2001, we begin to explore the key concepts of the course and consider some of the ways that our experience and understanding of gender is shaped by experiences of other social, cultural, political, and economic experiences including race, class, culture, sexuality, and so on. We ask big questions about identity, subjectivity, selfhood, and the ways that multiple aspects of our identities become entangled to shape our experience of the world - including of marginalisation and oppression. We will also discuss the structure of the course and assessment. |
Week 2 (04 Aug - 10 Aug) |
Lecture |
Week 2: Feminist Genealogies and Colonial Legacies In Week 2 of the course, we think carefully about the legacies and ongoing impacts of coloniality on our understandings and experiences of gender and sexuality. We will also turn to the work of Maria Lugones, examining her concept of the coloniality of gender and her call for a decolonial feminism. |
Tutorial |
Week 2: Feminist Genealogies and Colonial Legacies |
|
Week 3 (11 Aug - 17 Aug) |
No student involvement (Breaks, information) |
Week 3: Public Holiday |
Week 4 (18 Aug - 24 Aug) |
Lecture |
Week 4: Reimagining Geographies of Selves In Week 4, we engage with queer theory via Gloria Anzaldúa's work to ask questions and imagine new possibilities about selfhood with a special focus on labels, fixed categories and divisions between self and others. |
Tutorial |
Week 4: Reimagining Geographies of Selves |
|
Week 5 (25 Aug - 31 Aug) |
Lecture |
Week 5: Indigenous Gender The Week 5 lecture will consider the ways that the lives of Indigenous peoples are shaped by understandings of race, and we will examine active resistance to racism and coloniality. |
Tutorial |
Week 5: Indigenous Gender |
|
Week 6 (01 Sep - 07 Sep) |
Lecture |
Week 6: Decolonial Artivism In Week 6, we look at artivism (art + activism) and the way it has been used to cultivate awareness particularly about racial inequalities in feminist communities. |
Tutorial |
Week 6: Decolonial Artivism |
|
Week 7 (08 Sep - 14 Sep) |
Lecture |
Week 7: Can the Subaltern Speak? In the Week 7 lecture we will examine the politics of the subaltern, particularly thinking about postcolonial and decolonial feminisms in India. |
Tutorial |
Week 7: Can the Subaltern Speak? |
|
Week 8 (15 Sep - 21 Sep) |
Lecture |
Week 8: Feminisms in Asia Week 8, we will examine theories and discourses of Asian feminisms situated in a postcolonial context to reconsider the hegemony of western feminism. |
Tutorial |
Week 8: Feminisms in Asia |
|
Week 9 (22 Sep - 28 Sep) |
Lecture |
Week 9: We Should All Be Feminists: Nigerian Feminism In Week 9, we will begin to unpack different African feminisms by using Nigeria as a decolonial case study. |
Tutorial |
Week 9: We Should All Be Feminists: Nigerian Feminism |
|
Mid Sem break (29 Sep - 05 Oct) |
No student involvement (Breaks, information) |
Mid-Semester Break |
Week 10 (06 Oct - 12 Oct) |
Lecture |
Week 10: Ecofeminisms In Week 10, we ask: what do feminism, decoloniality, and environmentalism have to do with each other? |
Tutorial |
Week 10: Ecofeminisms |
|
Week 11 (13 Oct - 19 Oct) |
Lecture |
Week 11: Migrant & Refugee Women In Week 11, we explore the experiences of migrant & refugee women in Australia and consider the intersection of race and gender. |
Tutorial |
Week 11: Migrant & Refugee Women |
|
Week 12 (20 Oct - 26 Oct) |
Lecture |
Week 12: Islamic Feminisms In Week 12, we will explore perspectives and key issues in Islamic Feminisms around the world. |
Tutorial |
Week 12: Islamic Feminisms |
|
Week 13 (27 Oct - 02 Nov) |
Lecture |
Week 13: Course Wrap-Up This week we are going to think about the major themes that have emerged throughout the course and the overall takeaway messages from GEND2001. |
Policies and procedures
University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:
- Student Code of Conduct Policy
- Student Integrity and Misconduct Policy and Procedure
- Assessment Procedure
- Examinations Procedure
- Reasonable Adjustments for Students Policy and Procedure
Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.