Skip to menu Skip to content Skip to footer
Course profile

Australia in the 20th Century (HIST2247)

Study period
Sem 1 2025
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person

Course overview

Study period
Semester 1, 2025 (24/02/2025 - 21/06/2025)
Study level
Undergraduate
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person
Units
2
Administrative campus
St Lucia
Coordinating unit
Historical & Philosophical Inq

Across the long twentieth century, Australian society and culture was transformed. There were dramatic, even spectacular events: Federation; the First World War; the expansion of cities and social worlds in the 1920; the travails caused by the Great Depression; the upheavals of the Second World War; new migrations from the 1950s onwards; the revolutions of the 1960s and 1970s; and much more. There were equally significant changes to the way people understood their world, to their thought systems and their beliefs. This course explores these and other events and developments in Australia since 1901, placing an emphasis on their impact on ordinary people and everyday life.
This course may not run if there are fewer than 20 enrolments.

HIST2247 is designed to introduce students to some of the leading scholarship and debates in studies of Australian society and culture. We will also think about ways of writing history, its sources, methods and theories. Together we will explore a period of change and movement, and think about the ways Australia was altered across a tumultuous century, and the impact this has had on the ways we live now. Some of the major themes that run through the course include how national and international events and decisions impacted on everyday people's lives, and how they experienced and influenced the world around them.

Course requirements

Assumed background

There is no assumed background for this course.

Incompatible

You can't enrol in this course if you've already completed the following:

HIST7247

Course contact

Course staff

Lecturer

Tutor

Timetable

The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.

Additional timetable information

Lecture recordings which will be available each week from soon after the lecture. These will be supplemented by PowerPointᅠpresentations and other material available on the Blackboard site. However, it is much better for everyone if people physically attend lectures where possible. Tutorials are assessed, and attendance is important for your learning and for your results.

Aims and outcomes

This course aims to:

1) help you appreciate the different perspectives on the past offered by social, cultural and political history;

2) give you a good grasp of the key events, themes and developments in Australian history from 1901 to the present;

3) incite you to think about the relationship between Australian and global history;

4) prompt you to think about the relationship between individuals and the big sweep of history - between micro and macro views; and

5) encourage you to reflect on the relationship betweenᅠmemory and history, in large part by considering the pros and cons of using memoirs and oral histories as historical sources.

Learning outcomes

After successfully completing this course you should be able to:

LO1.

Understand the complex nature of Australian society, its different elements, and their separate and shared pasts.

LO2.

Identify, discuss and debate the main issues in twentieth-century Australian history and its importance to Australia today.

LO3.

Reflect on and discuss the different approaches to the past offered by social, cultural and political history.

LO4.

Reflect on and discuss the key problems and benefits offered by oral history sources and memoirs for an understanding of the past.

LO5.

Better express yourself in writing and in reasoned discussion with your peers.

LO6.

Demonstrate an ability to identify key ways in which Australian history fits into, or runs counter to, a bigger historical picture.

Assessment

Assessment summary

Category Assessment task Weight Due date
Essay/ Critique Research Essay 50% 2000 words

23/05/2025 2:00 pm

Examination Take Home Exam 20%

13/06/2025 2:00 pm

Due Friday 13 June 2pm

Paper/ Report/ Annotation Op-Ed piece 20% 750 words
Participation/ Student contribution Tutorial Participation 10%

Assessment details

Research Essay

Mode
Written
Category
Essay/ Critique
Weight
50% 2000 words
Due date

23/05/2025 2:00 pm

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Task description

Due 23 May, 2pm. 


2000 words


Identify one section of Australian society, in a particular period, who came to believe that they were being unfairly treated by the rest of society, and in particular government and its agencies.


Please specify the group and the period on the cover sheet or title page of your essay (eg, veterans after WWI, Indigenous Australians in the interwar period, gay men in the 1960s and 1970s, single parents in the 1970s….)


What were their grievances? What did they campaign for and how? Did they achieve their goals? If not, why not? If so, why?


Note that in answering this question, you can read "section of society" and "group" as referring to that group alone, or the group and its supporters and advocates.


Your essay should be fully referenced, including footnotes (Chicago 17 or 17A) and a bibliography. Footnotes are not included in word limits for essays and written assignments, unless they are discursive in character.


DO NOT USE IN-TEXT REFERENCING. Note that all references to books and articles must include specific page numbers (not page ranges). Essays that do not include specific page numbers may be returned for resubmission and may be penalised.


You must read the material on plagiarism carefully: any essays found with evidence of plagiarism will face disciplinary action.


You must use an essay format (no dot points, no headings) and lay out your argument clearly and effectively.


**For a research essay, you should consult at least ten secondary texts and three primary sources. The primary sources should come from people in the section of society that you are examining. 


This assessment task evaluates students' abilities, skills and knowledge without the aid of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). Students are advised that the use of AI technologies to develop responses is strictly prohibited and may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.

Submission guidelines

Submit through Turnitin via the course Blackboard pages

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Late submissions are penalised at 10% of the maximum mark, per calendar day.

Take Home Exam

Mode
Written
Category
Examination
Weight
20%
Due date

13/06/2025 2:00 pm

Due Friday 13 June 2pm

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L05, L06

Task description

Take Home Exam 


Due Friday 13 June, 2pm. 


1000 words


The purpose of the take home exam is to identify the level of basic knowledge you have acquired and retained from the course overall, and your grasp of the broader historical themes and issues. It will cover lecture and tutorial content, and you cannot repeat material from tutorial notes or your research essay. Referencing must be included.


Your essay answers should be fully referenced, including footnotes (Chicago 17 or 17A). Footnotes are not included in word limits for essays and written assignments, unless they are discursive in character.


DO NOT USE IN-TEXT REFERENCING. Note that all references to books and articles must include specific page numbers (not page ranges). Essays that do not include specific page numbers may be returned for resubmission and may be penalised.


The exam is worth 20% of your total mark, and is compulsory. The question/s will be released on Blackboard by 9am on Monday 3 June.


As this is an exam, late papers will not be accepted without a formal extension. 


This assessment task evaluates students' abilities, skills and knowledge without the aid of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). Students are advised that the use of AI technologies to develop responses is strictly prohibited and may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.

Exam details

Planning time no planning time minutes
Duration 60000 minutes
Calculator options

Any calculator permitted

Open/closed book Open Book examination
Exam platform Paper based
Invigilation

Not invigilated

Submission guidelines

Submit through Turnitin

Deferral or extension

You cannot defer or apply for an extension for this assessment.

Not unless there are compelling reasons such that would justify extension to a normal 2-3 hour centrally controled exam.

Late submission

You will receive a mark of 0 if this assessment is submitted late.

Late submissions will not be marked unless there are exceptional circumstances.

Op-Ed piece

Mode
Written
Category
Paper/ Report/ Annotation
Weight
20% 750 words
Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L05, L06

Task description

Op-Ed piece, due 2pm Friday of your chosen week.  


750 words


For one week of the course (and you can choose which week), you must submit a 750 word "op-ed" (opinion, editorial) piece for assessment. You can imagine this as an op-ed published in a newspaper, or for an online site such as The Conversation


The op-ed must be grounded in issues covered during that week's tutorials and must draw heavily - and primarily - on the tutorial readings.


The idea is to practise, and show your capacity for, relating historical knowledge to present-day issues. You could, for example, use the tutorial readings on Black Power and Black Rights to inform an op-ed piece on present-day Indigenous protest, or Australia Day, or the proposed referendum on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament. Or you could use the readings on the Great Depression to write an op-ed on how we understand poverty and hardship in present-day Australia. 


You may use other sources, but the op-ed piece should rely primarily on the tutorial readings for the historical aspect of your op-ed piece.


The op-ed will need to be submitted through Turnitin. 


Unlike "real" op-eds, your op-ed must be properly footnoted and should include a bibliography.


Your essay should be fully referenced, including footnotes (Chicago 17 or 17A) and a bibliography. Footnotes are not included in word limits for essays and written assignments, unless they are discursive in character.


DO NOT USE IN-TEXT REFERENCING. Note that all references to books and articles must include specific page numbers (not page ranges). Essays that do not include specific page numbers may be returned for resubmission and may be penalised.


This assessment task evaluates students' abilities, skills and knowledge without the aid of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). Students are advised that the use of AI technologies to develop responses is strictly prohibited and may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.



 

Submission guidelines

Submit through Turnitin via the course Blackboard pages

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Late submissions are penalised at 10% of the maximum mark, per calendar day.

Tutorial Participation

Mode
Activity/ Performance
Category
Participation/ Student contribution
Weight
10%
Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Task description

Your tutorial participation will be assessed according to the marking criteria (see below).



 

Submission guidelines

Deferral or extension

You cannot defer or apply for an extension for this assessment.

Course grading

Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.

Grade Cut off Percent Description
1 (Low Fail) 0 - 24

Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 1, Fails to demonstrate most or all of the basic requirements of the course: Grade 1, Low Fail (0-24%), is generally awarded in cases where some assessment has been submitted, but it is of wholly unsatisfactory standard or quantity. In work submitted, however, there is no demonstrated evidence of understanding of the concepts of the field of study or basic requirements of the course.

2 (Fail) 25 - 44

Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 2, Fail: Demonstrates clear deficiencies in understanding and applying fundamental concepts; communicates information or ideas in ways that are frequently incomplete or confusing and give little attention to the conventions of the discipline: Grade 2, Fail (25-44%), is generally awarded to work that exhibits deficiencies in understanding and applying the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study, and as such, does not satisfy the basic requirements of the course. Often, one or more major items of assessment will not have been completed.

3 (Marginal Fail) 45 - 49

Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes

Course grade description: Grade 3, Demonstrates superficial or partial or faulty understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study and limited ability to apply these concepts; presents undeveloped or inappropriate or unsupported arguments; communicates information or ideas with lack of clarity and inconsistent adherence to the conventions of the discipline: Grade 3, Marginal Fail (45-49%), is generally awarded if a student has submitted work that attempts to meet the knowledge and skill requirements of the course, but is only able to demonstrate a superficial understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course. Students will usually have attempted all major pieces of assessment and show that they have an identifiable, emerging ability to apply basic knowledge and skills.

4 (Pass) 50 - 64

Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 4, Pass: Demonstrates adequate understanding and application of the fundamental concepts of the field of study; develops routine arguments or decisions and provides acceptable justification; communicates information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline: Grade 4, Pass (50-64%), is generally awarded where all major items of assessment have been submitted. An adequate knowledge of the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study should be demonstrated and a functional skill level achieved.

5 (Credit) 65> - 74

Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 5, Credit: Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline: Grade 5, Credit (65-74%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and a substantial understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study have been demonstrated.

6 (Distinction) 75 - 84

Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 6, As for 5, with frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience: Grade 6, Distinction (75-84%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and substantial knowledge of the deeper and more complex aspects of the course and field of study have been demonstrated.

7 (High Distinction) 85 - 100

Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 7, High Distinction: As for 6, with consistent evidence of substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critically evaluates problems, their solutions and implications: Grade 7, High Distinction (85-100%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and there is evidence that the deeper and more complex aspects of the course and field of study have been mastered.

Additional course grading information

A word count that is within ±10% of the set length (word limit) is acceptable. Word count does not include footnotes; however, discursive footnotes are included in the word count. A word count that is outside these 10% will receive a proportionate penalty and will be graded against the grading criteria.


Essay Assessment Criteria (History, Ancient History and Classics, Religious Studies

Your essay will be assessed according to the following criteria: 

1.             Ability to construct a well-reasoned argument.

2.             Depth and breadth of knowledge and understanding of central issues.

3.             Ability to form a well-structured essay.

4.             Engagement with academic sources and evidence.

5.             Insight and/or creativity in interpreting texts or constructing a point of view or argument.

6.             Capacity to produce a coherent and well-written essay using correct grammar and syntax.

7.             Appropriately referenced, as per discipline conventions.

To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your essay should reflect an exceptional level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have undertaken extensive, high-level research, that you are able to form a very rigorous, well-organised argument, and that your discussion is original and creative. It should also demonstrate that you are able to evaluate and organise data and/or evidence in a critical manner and that you have a sophisticated and insightful understanding of problems and issues. Your essay should be very well written, clear and concise, pay strict attention to discipline conventions and have minimal, if any errors in referencing, expression, grammar, spelling and punctuation.

 

To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75 – 84%), your essay should reflect an advanced level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have undertaken wide research, that you are able to form a rigorous, well-organised argument, and that your discussion is coherent and convincing. It should also demonstrate that you are able to evaluate data and/or evidence in a perceptive manner, and that your understanding of problems and issues is perceptive and insightful. Your essay should be well written, clear and concise, follow discipline conventions and have few errors in referencing, expression, grammar, spelling and punctuation.

 

To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%) your essay should reflect a proficient level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have undertaken the expected level of research, that you are able to develop or adapt convincing arguments and justify them adequately, that you are able to evaluate data and/or evidence in a proficient manner, and that you have a proficient understanding of problems and issues. The presentation and referencing of your essay will largely follow discipline conventions, perhaps have some errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation, and demonstrate your ability to communicate effectively.

 

To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%) your essay should reflect a functional level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you are able to apply fundamental concepts and skills, that you have undertaken a basic level of research and have the basic ability to evaluate data and/or evidence, to identify problems and issues, to offer insights and to develop routine arguments. Your organisation, writing, referencing, spelling and grammar will be adequate and use some of the discipline conventions to communicate appropriately.

 

To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%), your essay should reflect developing levels of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have a superficial knowledge of fundamental concepts and skills, that you have undertaken a basic level of research, made some attempt to evaluate data and/or evidence, to identify problems and issues, and to offer insights. Your arguments, while underdeveloped, show your emerging ability to apply knowledge and skills. Your organisation, writing, spelling and grammar will be adequate, perhaps poor, and your referencing and use of discipline conventions poor/and or inconsistent. Alternatively, your essay may, in part, be well written and suggest human engagement and achievement but (whether actually developed with the help of AI or not) will (a) mostly exhibit the stereotypical and/or superficial understanding characteristic of generative AI text and/or (b) mostly fail, in a manner characteristic of generative AI text, to develop a sustained (multi-layered) argument: This grade is assigned for a total (sum of all the assessment components) in the range 45-49%. See assessment components for specific grading criteria.

 

To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%) your essay will reflect deficiencies in skill acquisition and in your understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course. It will demonstrate that you have not undertaken adequate research, that you are unable to evaluate data and/or evidence, to identify problems and issues, or to offer insights adequately. Your arguments will be unsupported and/or inappropriate, your organisation and writing will be poor and/or inappropriate, and referencing and use of discipline conventions poor/and or inconsistent. Alternatively, your essay may suggest developing or higher achievement but (whether actually developed with the help of AI or not) will (a) exhibit the stereotypical and/or superficial understanding that is characteristic of generative AI text and/or (b) may fail to develop, in a way that is characteristic of generative AI text, a sustained (multi-layered) argument: This grade is assigned for a total (sum of all the assessment components) in the range 25-44%. See assessment components for specific grading criteria

 

To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your essay will reflect that you have failed to meet the minimum learning requirements and skill acquisition for this course. Your essay will demonstrate an absence of research, evaluation of data and/or evidence, and lack argumentation. Use of discipline conventions will be absent, poor or inappropriate, and written expression poor or inappropriate.


Op-Ed piece Assessment Criteria

Your op-ed will be assessed according to the following criteria:

1.    Ability to construct a well-defined, well-reasoned, and persuasive argument.

2.    Depth and breadth of knowledge and understanding of central issues.

3.    Critical engagement with academic sources and evidence.

4.    Clear and concise written expression, ability to communicate an argument effectively and in the form of an opinion piece, well presented.

5.    Provision of a bibliography using discipline conventions.

To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85–100%), your op-ed should demonstrate that you have an exceptional and nuanced knowledge and understanding of the subject in question. Your argument should be clearly defined, sophisticated, and highly persuasive, demonstrating an exceptional level of critical engagement with primary and secondary source materials. Your writing will be very clear and concise and there will be minimal, if any, errors of referencing, expression, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Your writing style and tone will be highly appropriate for an opinion piece.

 

To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75–84%), your op-ed should demonstrate that you have an advanced knowledge and understanding of the subject in question. Your argument should be clearly defined and persuasive, demonstrating an advanced level of critical engagement with primary and secondary source materials. Your writing will be clear and concise and have few errors of referencing, expression, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Your writing style and tone will be appropriate for an op-ed piece.

 

To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65–74%), your op-ed should demonstrate that you have a proficient knowledge and understanding of the subject in question. Your argument should be largely well-defined, demonstrating some critical engagement with primary and secondary source materials. Your writing will be largely clear and concise with few/some errors of referencing, expression, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Your writing style and tone will be largely appropriate for an op-ed piece.

 

To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50–64%), your op-ed should demonstrate that you have a functional knowledge and understanding of the subject in question. Your argument will be reasonably well-defined, demonstrating a basic level of engagement with primary and secondary source materials. Your writing will be adequate with some errors of referencing, expression, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Your writing style and tone will be adequate for an op-ed piece.

 

To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45–49%), your op-ed should reflect a developing knowledge and understanding of the subject in question. Your argument, while underdeveloped, will have some definition, and demonstrate a superficial level of engagement with primary and secondary source materials. Your writing will be adequate, perhaps poor, with several errors of referencing, expression, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Your writing style and tone will be poor and/or inappropriate for an op-ed piece.

 

To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your op-ed will reflect an inadequate knowledge and understanding of concepts fundamental to the subject in question. Your argument will be unsupported and/or inappropriate and lacking in coherency. It will demonstrate that you have not undertaken adequate research, that you are unable to evaluate evidence, to identify problems and issues, or to offer insights adequately. You writing will be poor with frequent errors of referencing, expression, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Your writing style and tone will be inappropriate for an op-ed piece.

 

To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0–24%), your op-ed will reflect that you have failed to meet the minimum learning requirements and skill acquisition for this course. Your op-ed will demonstrate an absence of research, evaluation of evidence, and lack of argumentation. Written expression and style will be poor or inappropriate.


Take-Home Exam Assessment Criteria 

Students will be assessed according to the following criteria:

1.        Ability to construct a well-reasoned argument.

2.        Evidence of understanding of central issues.

3.        Ability to form a well-structured essay.

4.        Engagement with academic sources and evidence, as required.

5.        Insight and/or creativity in interpreting texts or constructing a point of view or argument.

6.        Capacity to produce a coherent and well-written essay using correct grammar and syntax;  appropriately referenced if required.

To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your take-home exam essay should demonstrate an exceptional level of rigour in argumentation and understanding of issues, exceptional organization of material, extensive research, and insightful and creative discussion. The written expression and presentation should be excellent and follow discipline conventions.

 

To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75-84%), your take-home exam essay should demonstrate an advanced level of rigour in argumentation and understanding of issues, very good organisation of material, wide research, and a capable synthesis of research materials. The written expression and presentation should be very good and follow discipline conventions.

 

To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%), your take-home exam essay should demonstrate a proficient level of rigour in argumentation and understanding of issues, good organization of material, a good level of research, and synthesis of research materials. The written expression and presentation should be good and largely follow discipline conventions.

 

To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%), your take-home exam essay should demonstrate a basic level argumentation, a fundamental understanding of issues, adequate organisation of material, a basic level of research, and an adequate synthesis of research materials. Your written expression and presentation should be satisfactory and follow discipline conventions.

 

To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%), your take-home exam essay will demonstrate that your attempt, while underdeveloped and falling short of a pass, shows your emerging ability to apply basic knowledge and skills. Your argumentation and understanding of issues will be superficial, your material poorly organised and synthesis of research materials limited. Your written expression and presentation should be adequate and should attempt to follow discipline conventions.

 

To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your take-home exam essay will demonstrate that your argumentation and understanding of issues was deficient, that your research was limited and/or poorly organised and explained, and that you did not understand fundamental aspects of the course. Your writing will be poor and/or inappropriate, and will not follow discipline conventions.

 

To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your take-home exam essay will demonstrate that you have failed to meet the minimum learning requirements and skill acquisition for this assessment task. You will not have mounted sound arguments and/or understood relevant issues. Your research will be limited and inadequately explained. Your essay will be poorly organised and/or poorly written, and will not follow discipline conventions.


Tutorial Participation Assessment Criteria 

Your tutorial participation will be assessed according to the following criteria: 

1.    Evidence of participation in discussions.

2.    Evidence of preparation for the tutorial, most notably through completing the set readings.

3.    Quality of contributions to discussions.

4.    Fostering of group discussions, through courteous and respectful interactions with staff and     students.

5.    Attendance is necessary to fulfill the above criteria, as per the course requirements, but marks cannot be awarded for attendance alone.

To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your attendance will be flawless and your participation exceptional. This grade reflects exceptional levels of preparation, mastery of course materials, and very high quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions. You should be able to engage with your peers very effectively.

 

To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75-84) your attendance will be excellent and your participation very substantial. This grade reflects excellent levels of preparation, knowledge of course materials, and high quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions. You should be able to engage with your peers effectively.

 

To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%), your attendance and participation will be good. This grade reflects proficient levels of preparation, good knowledge of course materials, and good quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.

 

To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%) your attendance and participation will be satisfactory. This grade reflects adequate levels of preparation and knowledge of course materials, and an acceptable quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.

 

To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%) your attendance and participation will be unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation and superficial knowledge of course materials and basic levels of preparation. However, when in attendance, there is evidence of your ability to demonstrate developing achievement in contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.

 

To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your attendance and participation will be very unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation, minimal knowledge of course materials, little evidence of preparation, and mixed to low quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.

 

To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your attendance and participation will be unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation, an no evidence of preparation, and little or no evidence of quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.

Supplementary assessment

Supplementary assessment is available for this course.

Additional assessment information

  • Failure to submit all major assessment items (those worth 15% and above) will result in a maximum grade of 2 (Fail).
  • By submitting work through Turnitin you are deemed to have accepted the following declaration:‘I certify that this assignment is my own work and has not been submitted, either previously or concurrently, in whole or in part, to this University or any other educational institution, for marking or assessment’.
  • All students must ensure that they receive their Turnitin receipt on every submission of assessment items. YOU MUST CHECK THAT THE RECEIPT CONFIRMS THAT SUBMISSION HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL.
  • A valid Turnitin receipt will be the only evidence accepted if assessments are missing.ᅠWithout evidence, the assessment will receive the standard late penalty, or after 7 calendar days, will receive zero. In the case of a Blackboard outage, please contact the Course Coordinator as soon as possible so that they can confirm the outage with ITS.
  • It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that they are submitting assessment items on a device that is capable of the task, and that appropriate internet bandwidth and speed is available. If you cannot be sure that your device or internet will enable you to complete or submit an assessment task, you must come onto campus and use one of the University Computers in the Library or Computer Labs.
  • Plagiarism, and asking or paying someone else to do your work is cheating and constitutes academic misconduct. See ECP Section 6.1
  • Feedback against the assessment criteria in the form of comments on your script will be provided through Turnitin or on your script directly.
  • For information on assessment remarks see: https://my.uq.edu.au/information-and-services/manage-my-program/exams-and-assessment/querying-result

Learning resources

You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.

Library resources

Find the required and recommended resources for this course on the UQ Library website.

Additional learning resources information

Your essay and all other written assignmentsᅠmust be properly footnoted, with a bibliography attached at the end in the case of essays and essay proposals. Bracketed or 'in-text'ᅠmethods of referencing are not acceptable in History.ᅠ


History students at UQ are asked to footnote using Chicago 17 or 17A (the guide is on the Library website). I am not pedantic about one form or another, so if you are comfortable with one style of footnotes ᅠplease continue to use this. It simply needs to be consistent and give full information. Note that page numbers are essential!

Learning activities

The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.

Filter activity type by

Please select
Clear filters
Learning period Activity type Topic
Week 1

(24 Feb - 02 Mar)

Lecture

Week 1 Lecture: A New Nation? Australia in 1901

A New Nation? Australia in 1901

Learning outcomes: L01

Week 2

(03 Mar - 09 Mar)

Lecture

Week 2 Lecture: White Australia and its Mythologies

Learning outcomes: L01

Tutorial

Week 2 Tutorial: Australia Unlimited? Population and Whiteness

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, many feared that Australia’s supposedly limitless potential was being threatened by an inability to populate the nation with the “right” kind of people. Too many non-whites would undermine the “British” nature of Australia and create the potential for racial discord and even decline. Not enough “white” Australians would leave the potential of the continent under-exploited and, more seriously, mean that the “British” hold on the continent was insecure through vulnerability to immigration and invasion.

One of a multitude of responses was to try and understand why birth rates were falling, and to take appropriate measures to increase them. The most serious attempt to wrestle with the issue was the 1903=-4 NSW Royal Commission onto the Decline of the Birth-Rate and on the Mortality of Infants in New South Wales, part of the report of which constitutes your tutorial reading for this week.


What did the statistical analysis reveal to the Commissioners? To what did they attribute the fall in birth-rates? What did they overlook, and why? Who did they ask and who did they not ask? Did this skew their findings? Can historical sources such as these reveal the views, action and emotions of everyday men and women?


Essential Readings

NSW Royal Commission onto Decline in Birth Rates, Report, 1904, pp. 14-44.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L05, L06

Week 3

(10 Mar - 16 Mar)

Lecture

Week 3 Lecture: Diggers: Black, White and Broken

Learning outcomes: L01

Tutorial

Week 3 Tutorial: War and Trauma

The contemporary interest in Anzac Day and the lives of veterans of the Great War tends to both highlight and paradoxically hide the trauma of war itself. Interestingly, oral histories done with WWI veterans in the 1990s showed that they were unsentimental about war and spoke less of the glories than of the horrors of life at the front. It is important therefore to consider the cultural issues of loss, grief and silence experience by both soldiers and those on the home front in Australia, especially in the aftermath of the war itself. This week, we will consider these ideas of war, trauma and grief and the ways they reshaped Australia in the early twentieth century.


What particular challenges were presented for the bereaved of WWI? In what ways did grieving practices attempt to resolve these specific challenges? How does Garry Roberts attempt to deal with his grief? In what ways is his grieving gendered? Do his practices strike you as a healthy way to manage and come to terms with the loss of his son?


Essential Readings

Tanja Luckins, ‘A Cruel Purgatory’ in her The Gates of Memory: Australian People’s Experiences and Memories of Loss and the Great War (Fremantle: Curtin University Books, 2004), pp.25-50.

Pat Jalland, ‘The “Silent Heartache” of the Great War’, in her Changing Ways of Death in Twentieth-Century Australia: War, Medicine and the Funeral Business (Sydney: UNSW Press, 2006), pp.75-105.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 4

(17 Mar - 23 Mar)

Lecture

Week 4 Lecture: The Stolen Generations (Dr Max Brierty)

Learning outcomes: L01

Tutorial

Week 4 Tutorial: Indigenous Children

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, all Australian colonies and states passed acts for the “protection” of Aboriginal Australians. This was the legislation that enabled the removal of Indigenous children from their parents in what became known as the “stolen generations”. In this tutorial we examine this legislation, and the experiences of children who were removed to missions and other institutions, and fostered to non-Indigenous families. Their testimony comes in the form of personal narratives delivered to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC)’s National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families. This Commission, established in 1995, delivered its report, commonly known as the Bringing them Home report, in 1997. Despite considerable criticism from some quarters, the report has become the basis for popular understandings of the stolen generations, and for the national apology which was delivered in 2008.


What is the significance of the term “protection”? What powers, and under what circumstances, did the NSW legislation grant to the “protector”? How did children experience the “protection”, and how did their experiences match with the intentions of child removal? Why were reunions with parents often less than ieal?

Are the children passive victims? Is there something problematic about non-Indigenous historians and governments writing Indigenous history? Is there too much emphasis on conflict and atrocity? What would you make of an argument that having colonised and stolen their land, we now colonise their pasts?


Essential Readings

NSW Aborigines Protection Act, 1909.

Bringing them Home: Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families (Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 1997), pp. 153-176 (Chapter 10: “Children’s Experiences”).

David Holinsworth, “Returns and Reunions: Many Journeys Home” in Doreen Mellor and Anna Haebich eds, Many Voices: Reflections on Experiences of Indigenous Child Separation (Canberra: National Library of Australia, 2002), pp. 87-107

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 5

(24 Mar - 30 Mar)

Lecture

Week 5 Lecture: On the Home Front, in War and Peace

Learning outcomes: L01

Tutorial

Week 5 Tutorial: The Great Depression – Fact or Fiction

David Potts’s 2006 book disrupted the historical narrative about the Great Depression in Australia, challenging whether the depression itself was really all that substantial. Potts focuses instead of ideas of happiness, community and resilience, rather than on trauma, fear or hardship.

I’m not sure I quite agree with him, but it is interesting to think about in terms of the primary evidence. In this tutorial, we will reflect on the nature of oral history and its status as an historical source, in particular in terms of nostalgia. We will also investigate the impact of the Depression on everyday life in 1930s Australia. Some of you may have family stories of great grandparents or great grandparents and their lives in the Depression in Queensland: if so, we’d love to hear their stories in class.


How convincing do you find the argument that for Australians, the hardships of the Great Depression were a myth? What are some of the key differences in the theory and method of oral history as used by McCalman and Potts?


Essential Readings

David Potts, The Myth of the Great Depression (Melbourne: Scribe, 2006), Conclusions, pp.325-341.

Janet McCalman, Struggletown: Public and Private Life in Richmond, 1900-1965 (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1998), pp.183-213.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 6

(31 Mar - 06 Apr)

Lecture

Week 6 Lecture: Post War Migration

Learning outcomes: L01

Tutorial

Week 6 Tutorial: Migration History and Migrants - A Case Study

Australia is often rather self-congratulatory about the manner in which it altered migration policies after WWII and welcomed people from a variety of central, southern and eastern European countries that it had previously excluded. At the time, and in much commemoration since, Australia has been presented as welcoming and generous. Given the horrors of the previous decade, and the staggering persecution of national and ethnic “outsiders” through much of the world in the 1940s, Australian policy and practice can easily be seen as benevolent. But only in relative terms.

The three readings this week all come from Alexandra Dellios. The first two show just how tough life was for migrant families in particular. The work contracts that men signed as part of their migration agreement separated them from their wives and children. Mothers found camp life hard, unrelenting and monotonous, and missed the support of their extended families. “Freedom” in Australia meant, for many, indentured labour, and closely supervised and crowded camps.

Dellios is herself the granddaughter of Greek migrants who came to Australia as sponsored migrants (meaning that they had a family member or friend already resident in Australia 'sponsor' their migration). Her family’s migration story sparked an interest in migration history which she began exploring as an undergraduate History student and continued into postgraduate study, then into an academic career. Keenly aware that her family’s story did not fit the simplistic commemorative narratives, Dellios has done much to expose the disjuncture between family and individual memories on one hand, and commemorative narratives on the other, for various waves of migrants. She and her work are thus an interesting case study in how academic history, often seen as elitist, provide an avenue for the voiceless to – eventually – be heard. Dellios is currently a senior lecturer in the Centre for Heritage and Museum Studies at the Australian National University.


Essential Readings 

Alexandra Dellios, “Displaced Persons, Family Separation and the Work Contract in Postwar Australia”, Journal of Australian Studies, vol 40, no. 4 (2016): 418-432

Alexandra Dellios, “Unsettling Post-war Settlement: Remembering Unassimilable Families in the Space of the Migrant Camp” in Interdisciplinary Unsettlings of Place and Space: Conversations, Investigations and Research, eds Sarah Pinto, Shelley Hannigan, Bernadette Walker-Gibbs and Emma Charlton (Singapore: Springer, 2019), 217-231.

Alexandra Dellios, “’Starting Fresh, Again and Again’: Family Experiences of Multiple Migrations to and From Australia” in When Migrants Fail to Stay: New Histories on Departures and Migration eds Ruth Balint, Joy Damousi and Sheila Fitzpatrick (London: Bloomsbury, 2023), 161-186.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 7

(07 Apr - 13 Apr)

Lecture

Week 7 Lecture: Youth Culture: The Rise of the Teenager (Dr Kate Ariotti)

Learning outcomes: L01

Tutorial

Week 7 Tutorial: Gender and Sexuality in the Fifties - and Beyond

In this week’s class, we will explore gender, heterosexuality and homosexuality in the 1950s. The fifties were a period of enormous material prosperity. This is a time of great economic stability: full employment, relatively high wages and the beginnings of the consumer culture. For a generation of people who have lived through the Depression and World War I, this was a golden age. But it was also a time of fear and uncertainty. Many people lived in fear of another Depression after WWII, and there were also broader political fears over communism and the far Left.

To counter the fears and menaces of the outside world, the fifties saw a retreat to the home and to domesticity: the idyll of the “suburban dream”. This meant a home in the suburbs, with the wife at home with children, and the husband going out to work to support the family.

Not all found this satisfying, however. Many women found themselves isolated within suburbia – more of a nightmare than a dream. And for those who were not heterosexual, the road was even more difficult and complex. Indeed, surveillance over homosexuality (mostly of men) intensified markedly in this period. In the second reading, we will consider the attempted control of homosexual men and women, and the impact this had on their lives.


How was the increased surveillance of homosexuality in 1950s Australia related to the so-called ‘suburban dream’? Why was homoswexuality seen as such a threat? Given that they were outside of the mainstream, what obstacles did Merv and Nola face in pursuing fulfilling lives, including emotionally and sexually? What challenges can you think of that they might not have mentioned – and why wouldn’t they mention them?


Essential Reading  

Lisa Featherstone, ‘Heterosexuality, Homosexuality and the “Happy Harmonious” 1950s’ in her Let’s Talk About Sex: Histories of Sexuality in Australia from Federation to the Pill (Cambridge: CSP, 2011), pp.229-261. 

Robert Reynolds and Shirleen Robinson, Gay and Lesbian, Then and Now: Australian Stories from a Social Revolution (Melbourne: Black Inc, 2016), part 1 “The Veterans”. (Merv and Nola).

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 8

(14 Apr - 20 Apr)

Lecture

Week 8 Lecture: Rebellion in the Sixties and Seventies

Learning outcomes: L01

Tutorial

Week 8 Tutorial: Black Power, Black Rights

The late 1960s and 1970s were periods of great cultural and political change in many Western nations, with a raft of social movements attempting to change the social order. These included movements for peace; Black Power; the green movement; feminism and gay rights. In this tutorial, we will examine some aspects of how indigenous Australians experienced this period of so-called revolution.


In doing so we will consider a particular problem – how is it that the successful 1967 referendum, which was supposed to improve the lot of Indigenous Australians, was soon followed by the rise of the Black Power movement and the establishment of the Aboriginal Tent Embassy?

Why, according to McGregor, was there such an overwhelmingly positive response to the 1967 referendum? And why, in some ways, was that counter-productive? Why was the Black Power movement so discontented despite the overwhelming response, and what did it seek instead? And why was there such strong public support for the Tent Embassy?


Essential Readings

Russell McGregor, ‘An Absent Negative: The 1967 Referendum’, History Australia, Volume 5 (2), 2016, pp.44.1-44.9.

Edwina Howell, “Black Power – by any means necessary.” In The Aboriginal Tent Embassy: Sovereignty, Black Power, Land Rights and the State. Edited by Gary Foley, Andrew Schaap, and Edwina Howell (Oxford: Taylor and Francis, 2014), pp. 67-83.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L05, L06

Week 9

(28 Apr - 04 May)

Lecture

Week 9 Lecture: The New Left and Generation Whitlam

Learning outcomes: L01

Tutorial

Week 9 Tutorial: Remembering Vietnam

The conflict in Vietnam retains a dogged place in Australian national identity, in particular with regards to its inclusion/exclusion from the Anzac type mythologies. Even at the time, it was an unpopular war, and there was strong opposition to Australian involvement, and the use of conscription. This was heightened by the media presence during the conflict. Probably for the first time, there were graphic images of civilian casualties in war, and television brought the war into homes in a way that had not been possible before. Memorable photographs – most notably that of the small Vietnamese girl Kim Phuc, running from a napalm attack – scarred the Australian imaginary.


In this tutorial, we consider how different sectors of Australian society remember and historicise this conflict. What was the experience of Australian troops in Vietnam, and in what regards are their popular memory tropes often historically inaccurate? What purposes do each of these tropes serve? How do veterans’ wives recall their experience of the war? And on what ways do the memories of South Vietnamese veterans throw a ”spanner into the works”?


Essential Reading

Joy Damousi, Living with the Aftermath: Trauma, Nostalgia and Grief in Post-War Australia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp.48-63.

Mia Martin Hobbs, "'We Went and did an Anzac job': Memory, Myth, and the Anzac Digger in Vietnam", Australian Journal of Politics and History, vol. 64, no. 3, (2018): 480-97.

Nathalie Huynh Chau Nguyen, "War and Disapora: The Memories of South Vietnamese Soldiers", Journal of Intercultural Studies, Vol 34, no. 6 (2013): 697-713.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05, L06

Week 10

(05 May - 11 May)

No student involvement (Breaks, information)

Week 10 Lecture: No lecture due to public holiday

Learning outcomes: L01

No student involvement (Breaks, information)

Week 10 Tutorial: No tutorial this week

Week 11

(12 May - 18 May)

Lecture

Week 11 Lecture: National Identity in the 80s and 90s

Learning outcomes: L01

Tutorial

Week 11 Tutorial: Celebrating a Nation?

The late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries saw a burgeoning of Australian nationalism and a growing number of occasions in which Australia tried to publicly represent itself to both the outside world and its own people. The Bicentenary, marking 200 years of European colonisation, took place in 1988 and was following 12 years later by the Sydney Olympics, and the year after that the Centenary of Federation. Meanwhile, Anzac Day grew steadily in importance from the late 1980s, and Australia Day from the late 1990s. In this tutorial we consider some of the issues surrounding national celebrations, and in particular who they exclude or marginalise.


Why did those leading the a people’s history of Australia since 1788 believe the massive, multi-volumed Australians: A Bicentennial History was problematic? What are national days supposed to achieve? Do any of Australia's "national days" truly do this? How can the excluded or marginalised respond?


Essential Readings:

“Australia deconstructed?: Assembling a people’s history of Australia since 1788"Australian Historical Studies, vol. 23, no. 91 (1988): 153-161.

William Pearson and Grant O’Neill, “Australia Day: A Day for All Australians?” in National Days: Constructing and Mobilising National Identity, eds. David McCrone and Gayle McPherson (London: Palgrave, 2009), pp.73-88.

Richard White, “National Days and the National Past in Australia”, Australian Cultural History, no. 22, 2003, pp.55-72.

Fabri Blacklock, "Telling it Our Way: Koori History in NSW", Australian Cultural History, no. 22, 2003, pp.155-160.  

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L05, L06

Week 12

(19 May - 25 May)

Lecture

Week 12 Lecture: “White Australia has a Black History” (Dr Max Brierty)

Learning outcomes: L01

Tutorial

Week 12 Tutorial: Towards Reconciliation?

Following the Bicentenary and the discovery by many that "White Australia has a Black History", the 1990s first raised and then dashed hopes for reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. In this tutorial we will consider three pivotal speeches from theree of the key players in the Reconciliation debate - prime ministers Paul Keating and John Howard, and Patrick Dodson, the first Chairman of the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation from its establishment in 1991 until he despaired in 1997.


What, in Paul Keating's speech, might have been regarded as offensive or confronting by many more conservatively-minded Australians?

What, in John Howard's speech, would progressive and Indigenous Australians have objected to? Why do you think Howard's speech seemed to resonate more with "mainsteam" Australians?

And where did all of this leave Indigenous Australians? Were they pawns in non-Indigenous culture wars? What is Pat Dodson's take on it?


Essential Readings:

Paul Keating, Speech by the Hon Prime Minister P.J. Keating, Australian Launch of the International Year for the World’s Indigenous People, Redfern, 10 December 1992. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet https://pmtranscripts.pmc.gov.au accessed 19 January 2024.

John Howard, Transcript of the Prime Minister the Hon John Howard MP Opening Address to the Australian Reconciliation Convention – Melbourne, 26 May 1997. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet https://pmtranscripts.pmc.gov.au accessed 19 January 2024

Patrick Dodson, ‘Beyond the Mourning Gate – Dealing with Unfinished Business’, The Wentworth Lecture, May 2000.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L05, L06

Week 13

(26 May - 01 Jun)

Lecture

Week 13 Lecture: Conclusion and take-home exam consultation

Learning outcomes: L01

Tutorial

Week 13 Tutorial: No tutorial this week

No tutorial this week

Policies and procedures

University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:

Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.