Course coordinator
Associate Professor Morris Low
Course overview
- Study period
- Semester 1, 2025 (24/02/2025 - 21/06/2025)
- Study level
- Undergraduate
- Location
- St Lucia
- Attendance mode
- In Person
- Units
- 2
- Administrative campus
- St Lucia
- Coordinating unit
- Historical & Philosophical Inq
This course will help students to understand the contemporary world by gaining a deeper understanding of the forces that have shaped the world since the Second World War. It will also develop the skills of researching and analysing contemporary history which will enable students to form a greater critical understanding of current world issues. The course will cover topics such as: The postwar order; Cold War and the role of the USA; decolonisation (Asia and Africa); apartheid; Civil Rights and the politics of race; energy issues and economic crisis (1970s); fall of Communism and prospects of united Europe; rise of Asian economies and China as a superpower; the crisis of neo-liberalism; environmental crisis and protest; the new disorder.
In 2025, the course will be taught by Assoc. Prof. Morris Low. While many of his lectures will deal with issues that the world was grappling with after the Second World War especially in light of the present day, new lectures will turn the spotlight on Australia. We will examine the fight for Indigenous rights here and Dr Cassandra Byrnes will present a lecture on the battle for women's rights and LGBTQ+ rights. To what extent were they empowered by what was occurring in the USA and elsewhere?
Course requirements
Restrictions
Minimum of 20 students to run
Course contact
Course staff
Lecturer
Guest lecturer
Tutor
Timetable
The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.
Additional timetable information
Lectures will be given live and in-person in the venue listed on your timetable. They will be recorded through the Echo360 lecture recording system and will be available subsequently through the course Blackboard site.
Aims and outcomes
This course will help students to understand the contemporary world by gaining a deeper understanding of the forces that have shaped the world since the Second World War. It will also develop the skills of researching and analysing contemporary history which will enable students to form a greater critical understanding of current world issues.ﾠ
The course is also designed to promote the development of higher order skills of historical thinking: understanding of how a scholarly field is constituted and how debates on historical analysis are conducted; ability to understand a range of approaches to the study of important historical phenomena, and to compare similar historical developments across different countries and contexts.
Learning outcomes
After successfully completing this course you should be able to:
LO1.
The courses objectives include the development of students capacity to analyse critically significant historical developments in their context.
LO2.
Development of students capacity to analyse critically historical developments and historiographical debates, and to test the validity of theoretical explanations for significant historical phenomena.
LO3.
The course is also intended to develop an understanding of the historical origins of contemporary issues and to develop an understanding of the need to understand these issues in a global context.
LO4.
The course is designed to foster advanced historical skills, including the capacity to analyse clearly complex historical issues and debates and to present arguments at an advanced level through appropriate style and means of scholarly writing.
LO5.
Through tutorial participation and contribution to group discussions, students should gain experience of effective and appropriate spoken as well as written communication.
Assessment
Assessment summary
| Category | Assessment task | Weight | Due date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reflection, Tutorial/ Problem Set |
Tutorial Diary
|
10% |
3/03/2025 - 12/05/2025 |
| Participation/ Student contribution | Tutorial participation | 10% |
3/03/2025 - 12/05/2025 |
| Essay/ Critique |
Research Essay
|
40% |
1/05/2025 2:00 pm |
| Essay/ Critique, Examination | Central Exam | 40% |
End of Semester Exam Period 7/06/2025 - 21/06/2025 |
Assessment details
Tutorial Diary
- Online
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Reflection, Tutorial/ Problem Set
- Weight
- 10%
- Due date
3/03/2025 - 12/05/2025
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03, L04, L05
Task description
One exercise due at the time of each week’s tutorial (a hard copy printout to be submitted at the start of the tutorial), which taken together can be regarded as your 'Tutorial Diary'.
Each week, you should pick one set reading for the week’s tutorial (journal article or book chapter) and answer the questions set out on the template on the Blackboard site. The reading that you choose should not be the required reading from the textbook. This assessment task evaluates students' abilities, skills and knowledge without the aid of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). Students are advised that the use of AI technologies to develop responses is strictly prohibited and may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
Submission guidelines
Please hand in a printout of your responses to the questions directly to your tutor at the beginning of the respective tutorial. If that is not possible, please email them to your tutor prior to the tutorial. They will be noted. An overall mark for the tutorial diary will be given at the end of the semester.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
The maximum extension allowed is 7 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.
It is only possible to apply for an extension for the weekly tutorial exercise and not for tutorial participation.
Late submission
Late submission of assessment will incur a penalty of 10% of the marks available for the assessment item, per calendar day or part-day after the due date, for a maximum of 7 days, after which a mark of zero will be recorded.
Tutorial participation
- Mode
- Activity/ Performance
- Category
- Participation/ Student contribution
- Weight
- 10%
- Due date
3/03/2025 - 12/05/2025
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03, L04, L05
Task description
Tutorial participation requires preparation for the tutorial each week by completing the set reading, contributing to discussions in class, and fostering the contributions of others (see criteria below).
Submission guidelines
Deferral or extension
You cannot defer or apply for an extension for this assessment.
Research Essay
- Online
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Essay/ Critique
- Weight
- 40%
- Due date
1/05/2025 2:00 pm
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03, L04
Task description
2,500-word research essay (see criteria below). Questions and recommended readings will be provided on the course Blackboard site, and further advice provided in class.
This assessment task evaluates students' abilities, skills and knowledge without the aid of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). Students are advised that the use of AI technologies to develop responses is strictly prohibited and may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
Submission guidelines
Please submit via Turn-It-In by 2:00 pm on the due date.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.
Extension applications must be via my.UQ –> Manage my program - > exams and assessment -> Applying for an extension.
Extension applications must be submitted at least 24 hours prior to the submission date, unless the medical or other circumstances are such that the student cannot reasonably be expected to have applied by the appropriate due date.
Extension requests may take up to 48 hours to be assessed (not including weekends and public holidays).
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Late submission of assessment will incur a penalty of 10% of the marks available for the assessment item, per calendar day or part-day after the due date, for a maximum of 7 days, after which a mark of zero will be recorded.
Central Exam
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Essay/ Critique, Examination
- Weight
- 40%
- Due date
End of Semester Exam Period
7/06/2025 - 21/06/2025
- Learning outcomes
- L01, L02, L03, L04
Task description
A centrally timetabled exam in the end-of-semester exam period. Fixed-time, time-limited (2 hours).
Exam details
| Planning time | 10 minutes |
|---|---|
| Duration | 120 minutes |
| Calculator options | No calculators permitted |
| Open/closed book | Closed Book examination - no written materials permitted |
| Exam platform | Paper based |
| Invigilation | Invigilated in person |
Submission guidelines
Deferral or extension
You may be able to defer this exam.
Course grading
Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.
| Grade | Cut off Percent | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 (Low Fail) | 0 - 24 |
Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 1, Fails to demonstrate most or all of the basic requirements of the course: Grade 1, Low Fail (0-24%), is generally awarded in cases where some assessment has been submitted, but it is of wholly unsatisfactory standard or quantity. In work submitted, however, there is no demonstrated evidence of understanding of the concepts of the field of study or basic requirements of the course. |
| 2 (Fail) | 25 - 44 |
Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 2, Fail: Demonstrates clear deficiencies in understanding and applying fundamental concepts; communicates information or ideas in ways that are frequently incomplete or confusing and give little attention to the conventions of the discipline: Grade 2, Fail (25-44%), is generally awarded to work that exhibits deficiencies in understanding and applying the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study, and as such, does not satisfy the basic requirements of the course. Often, one or more major items of assessment will not have been completed. |
| 3 (Marginal Fail) | 45 - 49 |
Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes Course grade description: Grade 3, Demonstrates superficial or partial or faulty understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study and limited ability to apply these concepts; presents undeveloped or inappropriate or unsupported arguments; communicates information or ideas with lack of clarity and inconsistent adherence to the conventions of the discipline: Grade 3, Marginal Fail (45-49%), is generally awarded if a student has submitted work that attempts to meet the knowledge and skill requirements of the course, but is only able to demonstrate a superficial understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course. Students will usually have attempted all major pieces of assessment and show that they have an identifiable, emerging ability to apply basic knowledge and skills. |
| 4 (Pass) | 50 - 64 |
Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 4, Pass: Demonstrates adequate understanding and application of the fundamental concepts of the field of study; develops routine arguments or decisions and provides acceptable justification; communicates information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline: Grade 4, Pass (50-64%), is generally awarded where all major items of assessment have been submitted. An adequate knowledge of the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study should be demonstrated and a functional skill level achieved. |
| 5 (Credit) | 65 - 74 |
Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 5, Credit: Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline: Grade 5, Credit (65-74%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and a substantial understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study have been demonstrated. |
| 6 (Distinction) | 75 - 84 |
Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 6, As for 5, with frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience: Grade 6, Distinction (75-84%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and substantial knowledge of the deeper and more complex aspects of the course and field of study have been demonstrated. |
| 7 (High Distinction) | 85 - 100 |
Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes. Course grade description: Grade 7, High Distinction: As for 6, with consistent evidence of substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critically evaluates problems, their solutions and implications: Grade 7, High Distinction (85-100%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and there is evidence that the deeper and more complex aspects of the course and field of study have been mastered. |
Additional course grading information
A word count that is within ±10% of the set length (word limit) is acceptable. Word count does not include footnotes; however, discursive footnotes are included in the word count. A word count that is outside these 10% will receive a proportionate penalty and will be graded against the grading criteria.
Diary Assessment Criteria
Your diary assessment task will be assessed according to the following criteria:
1. Degree to which set questions and topic have been addressed.
2. Understanding and engagement with set reading or other materials as required.
3. Clear and concise written expression, well presented.
4. Completion of diary entries, as per course requirements.
To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your diary will provide an exceptional response to the set topic, demonstrate exceptional levels of engagement with and understanding of the prescribed readings, and use very clear and concise expression with minimal, if any errors.
To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75-84%), your diary will provide an advanced level of response to the set topic, demonstrate very high levels of engagement with and understanding of the prescribed readings, and use clear and concise, largely error free expression.
To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%), your diary will provide a proficient response to the set topic, demonstrate high levels of engagement with and understanding of the prescribed readings, and use an effective standard of written expression.
To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%), your diary will provide a basic response to the set topic, demonstrate functional levels of engagement with and understanding of the prescribed readings, and use an appropriate standard of written expression sufficient to convey your ideas.
To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%), your diary will show that your entry has failed to meet the requirements for a passing grade, but that there is evidence of developing levels of achievement. You will have attempted to respond to the set topic, attempted to engage with and understand the prescribed readings. You will have used an appropriate a standard of written expression sufficient to convey your ideas.
To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your diary will show that you have provided an unsatisfactory response to the set topic, that your levels of engagement with and understanding of the prescribed readings are minimal, and that your expression is poor and/or inappropriate.
To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your diary will show that you have provided an unsatisfactory response to the set topic, that you have failed to engage with and understand the prescribed readings, and that your expression is poor and/or unsatisfactory.
Tutorial Participation Assessment Criteria
Your tutorial participation will be assessed according to the following criteria:
1. Evidence of participation in discussions.
2. Evidence of preparation for the tutorial, most notably through completing the set readings.
3. Quality of contributions to discussions.
4. Fostering of group discussions, through courteous and respectful interactions with staff and students.
5. Attendance is necessary to fulfill the above criteria, as per the course requirements, but marks cannot be awarded for attendance alone.
To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your attendance will be flawless and your participation exceptional. This grade reflects exceptional levels of preparation, mastery of course materials, and very high quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions. You should be able to engage with your peers very effectively.
To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75-84) your attendance will be excellent and your participation very substantial. This grade reflects excellent levels of preparation, knowledge of course materials, and high quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions. You should be able to engage with your peers effectively.
To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%), your attendance and participation will be good. This grade reflects proficient levels of preparation, good knowledge of course materials, and good quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.
To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%) your attendance and participation will be satisfactory. This grade reflects adequate levels of preparation and knowledge of course materials, and an acceptable quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.
To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%) your attendance and participation will be unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation and superficial knowledge of course materials and basic levels of preparation. However, when in attendance, there is evidence of your ability to demonstrate developing achievement in contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.
To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your attendance and participation will be very unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation, minimal knowledge of course materials, little evidence of preparation, and mixed to low quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.
To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your attendance and participation will be unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation, an no evidence of preparation, and little or no evidence of quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.
Essay Assessment Criteria
Your essay will be assessed according to the following criteria:
1. Ability to construct a well-reasoned argument.
2. Depth and breadth of knowledge and understanding of central issues.
3. Ability to form a well-structured essay.
4. Engagement with academic sources and evidence.
5. Insight and/or creativity in interpreting texts or constructing a point of view or argument.
6. Capacity to produce a coherent and well-written essay using correct grammar and syntax.
7. Appropriately referenced, as per discipline conventions.
To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your essay should reflect an exceptional level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have undertaken extensive, high-level research, that you are able to form a very rigorous, well-organised argument, and that your discussion is original and creative. It should also demonstrate that you are able to evaluate and organise data and/or evidence in a critical manner and that you have a sophisticated and insightful understanding of problems and issues. Your essay should be very well written, clear and concise, pay strict attention to discipline conventions and have minimal, if any errors in referencing, expression, grammar, spelling and punctuation.
To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75 – 84%), your essay should reflect an advanced level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have undertaken wide research, that you are able to form a rigorous, well-organised argument, and that your discussion is coherent and convincing. It should also demonstrate that you are able to evaluate data and/or evidence in a perceptive manner, and that your understanding of problems and issues is perceptive and insightful. Your essay should be well written, clear and concise, follow discipline conventions and have few errors in referencing, expression, grammar, spelling and punctuation.
To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%) your essay should reflect a proficient level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have undertaken the expected level of research, that you are able to develop or adapt convincing arguments and justify them adequately, that you are able to evaluate data and/or evidence in a proficient manner, and that you have a proficient understanding of problems and issues. The presentation and referencing of your essay will largely follow discipline conventions, perhaps have some errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation, and demonstrate your ability to communicate effectively.
To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%) your essay should reflect a functional level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you are able to apply fundamental concepts and skills, that you have undertaken a basic level of research and have the basic ability to evaluate data and/or evidence, to identify problems and issues, to offer insights and to develop routine arguments. Your organisation, writing, referencing, spelling and grammar will be adequate and use some of the discipline conventions to communicate appropriately.
To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%), your essay should reflect developing levels of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have a superficial knowledge of fundamental concepts and skills, that you have undertaken a basic level of research, made some attempt to evaluate data and/or evidence, to identify problems and issues, and to offer insights. Your arguments, while underdeveloped, show your emerging ability to apply knowledge and skills. Your organisation, writing, spelling and grammar will be adequate, perhaps poor, and your referencing and use of discipline conventions poor/and or inconsistent. Alternatively, your essay may, in part, be well written and suggest human engagement and achievement but (whether actually developed with the help of AI or not) will (a) mostly exhibit the stereotypical and/or superficial understanding characteristic of generative AI text and/or (b) mostly fail, in a manner characteristic of generative AI text, to develop a sustained (multi-layered) argument: This grade is assigned for a total (sum of all the assessment components) in the range 45-49%. See assessment components for specific grading criteria.
To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%) your essay will reflect deficiencies in skill acquisition and in your understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course. It will demonstrate that you have not undertaken adequate research, that you are unable to evaluate data and/or evidence, to identify problems and issues, or to offer insights adequately. Your arguments will be unsupported and/or inappropriate, your organisation and writing will be poor and/or inappropriate, and referencing and use of discipline conventions poor/and or inconsistent. Alternatively, your essay may suggest developing or higher achievement but (whether actually developed with the help of AI or not) will (a) exhibit the stereotypical and/or superficial understanding that is characteristic of generative AI text and/or (b) may fail to develop, in a way that is characteristic of generative AI text, a sustained (multi-layered) argument: This grade is assigned for a total (sum of all the assessment components) in the range 25-44%. See assessment components for specific grading criteria
To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your essay will reflect that you have failed to meet the minimum learning requirements and skill acquisition for this course. Your essay will demonstrate an absence of research, evaluation of data and/or evidence, and lack argumentation. Use of discipline conventions will be absent, poor or inappropriate, and written expression poor or inappropriate.
Exam Assessment Criteria
Your exam responses will be assessed according to the following criteria:
Essay Questions
Students will be assessed on:
1. Ability to recognize key issues in the question.
2. Ability to structure an argument.
3. Use of evidence.
4. Engagement with academic scholarship and/or debates.
5. Clear and concise written expression, well presented.
Unlike formative assessments undertaken during your course (such as book reviews and essays), exam answers are typically marked on right or wrong basis for multiple choice, single word and short answer questions. Individual exam essays and other exam questions are not awarded grades but are assessed numerically (such as a mark out of five, or a mark out of ten). The overall grade achieved for an exam is arrived at by totalling the marks for the constituent elements of the exam.
Supplementary assessment
Supplementary assessment is available for this course.
Additional assessment information
- Failure to submit all major assessment items (those worth 15% and above) will result in a maximum grade of 2 (Fail).
- By submitting work through Turnitin you are deemed to have accepted the following declaration:‘I certify that this assignment is my own work and has not been submitted, either previously or concurrently, in whole or in part, to this University or any other educational institution, for marking or assessment’.
- All students must ensure that they receive their Turnitin receipt on every submission of assessment items. YOU MUST CHECK THAT THE RECEIPT CONFIRMS THAT SUBMISSION HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL.
- A valid Turnitin receipt will be the only evidence accepted if assessments are missing.ﾠWithout evidence, the assessment will receive the standard late penalty, or after 7 calendar days, will receive zero. In the case of a Blackboard outage, please contact the Course Coordinator as soon as possible so that they can confirm the outage with ITS.
- It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that they are submitting assessment items on a device that is capable of the task, and that appropriate internet bandwidth and speed is available. If you cannot be sure that your device or internet will enable you to complete or submit an assessment task, you must come onto campus and use one of the University Computers in the Library or Computer Labs.
- Plagiarism, and asking or paying someone else to do your work is cheating and constitutes academic misconduct. See ECP Section 6.1
- Feedback against the assessment criteria in the form of comments on your script will be provided through Turnitin or on your script directly.
- For information on assessment remarks see: https://my.uq.edu.au/information-and-services/manage-my-program/exams-and-assessment/querying-result
Learning resources
You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.
Library resources
Find the required and recommended resources for this course on the UQ Library website.
Learning activities
The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.
Filter activity type by
Please select
| Learning period | Activity type | Topic |
|---|---|---|
Week 1 (24 Feb - 02 Mar) |
Lecture |
Week 1 Introduction: The World in 1945 Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Multiple weeks From Week 2 To Week 11 |
Tutorial |
Tutorials Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L05 |
Week 2 (03 Mar - 09 Mar) |
Lecture |
Week 2 The Chinese Revolution and the Cold War in Asia Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 3 (10 Mar - 16 Mar) |
Lecture |
Week 3 The Cold War in Europe (Lecture moved to Week 4 due to Cyclone Alfred; tutorials held in Week 3) Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 4 (17 Mar - 23 Mar) |
Lecture |
Week 4 The Cold War in Europe; Decolonization Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 5 (24 Mar - 30 Mar) |
Lecture |
Week 5 Civil Rights, Apartheid, and the Politics of Race Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 6 (31 Mar - 06 Apr) |
Lecture |
Week 6 The Fight for Indigenous Rights; The Battle for Women's Rights and LGBTQ+ Rights in Australia Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 7 (07 Apr - 13 Apr) |
Lecture |
Week 7 Energy Crises and Limits to Growth: Rise of Environmental Politics Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 8 (14 Apr - 20 Apr) |
Lecture |
Week 8 Triumph of Neo-Liberalism, European Integration and Collapse of Soviet Communism Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 9 (28 Apr - 04 May) |
Lecture |
Week 9 Neo-Liberalism in Crisis: The Global Economy after 2008 Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 10 (05 May - 11 May) |
Lecture |
Week 10 World-Wide Webs: Globalized Culture? Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 11 (12 May - 18 May) |
Lecture |
Week 11 Challenges to Hegemony: Islamism, Nationalism and Others Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 12 (19 May - 25 May) |
Lecture |
Week 12 Where to next? America under Trump Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Week 13 (26 May - 01 Jun) |
Lecture |
Week 13 Conclusion and Wrap-up Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03 |
Policies and procedures
University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:
- Student Code of Conduct Policy
- Student Integrity and Misconduct Policy and Procedure
- Assessment Procedure
- Examinations Procedure
- Reasonable Adjustments - Students Policy and Procedure
Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.