Skip to menu Skip to content Skip to footer
Course profile

Advanced Latin 2 (LATN3002)

Study period
Sem 2 2025
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person

Course overview

Study period
Semester 2, 2025 (28/07/2025 - 22/11/2025)
Study level
Undergraduate
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person
Units
2
Administrative campus
St Lucia
Coordinating unit
Historical & Philosophical Inq

A detailed study of Latin literary and historical texts chosen by the Course Coordinator.

The set textᅠfor this course is Vergil, ᅠAeneid ᅠ6. Vergil is probably the best known of all Latin poets from the Golden Age of Augustan Rome and he was certainly a great master of epic poetry. Before each class students are expected to prepare a set amount of text for translation and discussion,ᅠand to be aware of the main relevant points of grammar and syntax, literary style and allusions in the prepared material. There will also be some metrical analysis of the text.ᅠ

Regular attendance and preparation are expected.

Course requirements

Assumed background

LATN3002 is an advanced undergraduate course in Latin. It is assumed that most students will have completed LATN2240 or LATN3000, though you are permitted to enrol if you have completed LATN2230 or equivalent with a passing grade.

Prerequisites

You'll need to complete the following courses before enrolling in this one:

LATN1110, LATN2120, LATN2230

Recommended prerequisites

We recommend completing the following courses before enrolling in this one:

LATN3000

Incompatible

You can't enrol in this course if you've already completed the following:

LATN2250, LATN2270

Course contact

Course coordinator

Dr Annabel Florence

By appointment. Please email me to arrange a time.

Course staff

Lecturer

Timetable

The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.

Additional timetable information

Classes will be held on Tuesdays, 8-10, and will also be recorded.

In-person attendance is strongly encouraged.

Students are asked to consult mySI-net for timetable changes prior to commencement of the first week of teaching.

Aims and outcomes

This course aims to translate and discuss Book 6 of Vergil's Aeneidᅠin a critical manner, giving particular attention to the author's language, style and aims, along with the origins and traditions of the epic genre.

Assessment

Assessment summary

Category Assessment task Weight Due date
Participation/ Student contribution, Presentation, Translation/ Interpretation, Tutorial/ Problem Set Class Participation
  • Hurdle
  • Identity Verified
  • In-person
15%

4/08/2025 - 20/10/2025

Examination Scansion Test
  • Identity Verified
  • In-person
5%

26/08/2025 8:00 am

Performance Performance
  • Hurdle
  • Online
20%

7/10/2025 2:00 pm

Essay/ Critique, Translation/ Interpretation Critical Essay
  • Hurdle
  • Online
25%

24/10/2025 2:00 pm

Examination Final Exam
  • Hurdle
  • Identity Verified
  • In-person
35%

End of Semester Exam Period

8/11/2025 - 22/11/2025

A hurdle is an assessment requirement that must be satisfied in order to receive a specific grade for the course. Check the assessment details for more information about hurdle requirements.

Assessment details

Class Participation

  • Hurdle
  • Identity Verified
  • In-person
Mode
Oral
Category
Participation/ Student contribution, Presentation, Translation/ Interpretation, Tutorial/ Problem Set
Weight
15%
Due date

4/08/2025 - 20/10/2025

Other conditions
Longitudinal.

See the conditions definitions

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Task description

Students are expected to translate all the Latin set for translation each week.

Additionally, each student will be responsible for set lines from the text and present them to the class for group discussion. These presentations should not only include your translation but also highlight sections that are particularly interesting in terms of parsing, scansion, poetic devices, and literary allusion.

Further information will be provided on Blackboard and in class

This assessment task is to be completed in-person. The use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Translation (MT) tools will not be permitted. Any attempted use of AI or MT may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.

Marking criteria and/or marking rubrics are available in the ‘Assessment’ folder in Blackboard for this course.

Hurdle requirements

Failure to submit all major assessment items (those worth 15% and above) will result in a maximum grade of 2 (Fail).

Submission guidelines

Deferral or extension

You cannot defer or apply for an extension for this assessment.

Scansion Test

  • Identity Verified
  • In-person
Mode
Written
Category
Examination
Weight
5%
Due date

26/08/2025 8:00 am

Learning outcomes
L02, L03, L04, L05

Task description

This assessment requires students to accurately scan a selected passage from Vergil's Aeneid, Book VI, applying the principles of dactylic hexameter. A key component involves an analytical discussion of how Vergil manipulates the meter to achieve specific poetic effects, conveying meaning, establishing mood, or creating rhetorical emphasis.

This assessment task is to be completed in-person. The use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Translation (MT) tools will not be permitted. Any attempted use of AI or MT may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.

Exam details

Planning time no planning time minutes
Duration 60 minutes
Calculator options

No calculators permitted

Open/closed book Closed book examination - no written materials permitted
Exam platform Paper based
Invigilation

Invigilated in person

Submission guidelines

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

Performance

  • Hurdle
  • Online
Mode
Activity/ Performance, Oral, Written
Category
Performance
Weight
20%
Due date

7/10/2025 2:00 pm

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Task description

Task: Choose a passage of Vergil from the set readings and make an audiovisual recording of yourself reciting the Latin and then translating it. Additionally, you must record yourself discussing how the metre, literary devices, and genre of Vergil's Aeneid colour the meaning of the passage. The commentary section should last for at least 5 minutes. You must also submit a copy of the text showing your scansion. Further details will be provided in class closer to the assessment date. You may use any programme to record yourself. You may use PowerPoint or other visual aids to enhance your performance.  

 ***Marking criteria and/or marking rubrics are available in the ‘Assessment’ folder in Blackboard for this course.

AI: This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance. A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.

Hurdle requirements

Failure to submit all major assessment items (those worth 15% and above) will result in a maximum grade of 2 (Fail).

Submission guidelines

Please submit your completed assignment through the appropriate submission link on Blackboard.

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

Extension applications must be via my.UQ –> Manage my program - > exams and assessment -> Applying for an extension. 

Extension applications must be submitted at least 24 hours prior to the submission date, unless the medical or other circumstances are such that the student cannot reasonably be expected to have applied by the appropriate due date.

Extension requests may take up to 48 hours to be assessed (not including weekends and public holidays).

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Critical Essay

  • Hurdle
  • Online
Mode
Written
Category
Essay/ Critique, Translation/ Interpretation
Weight
25%
Due date

24/10/2025 2:00 pm

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Task description

Task: Students are required to write a critical evaluation essay based on one of three passages of Aeneid 6 set for analysis by the course coordinator. Students are also required to provide their own English translations of their chosen Latin text.

This task requires students to demonstrate an understanding of the prescribed Latin text(s) for analysis. Extensive consultation of modern sources beyond the recommended reading list is not required unless critically relevant material is identified for inclusion in the analysis.

Essay Questions and further details will be made available on Blackboard and discussed in class.

Referencing Style: Students must use the Classics and Ancient History Referencing style. Videos and a downloadable document will be available on Blackboard.

Word Limit: 1500 words (including discursive footnotes) but excluding references and bibliography.

Please Note: A word count that is within ±10% of the set length (word limit) is acceptable. A word count that is outside these 10% will receive a proportionate penalty and will be graded against the grading criteria.

AI: This task has been designed to be challenging, authentic and complex. Whilst students may use AI and/or MT technologies, successful completion of assessment in this course will require students to critically engage in specific contexts and tasks for which artificial intelligence will provide only limited support and guidance. A failure to reference generative AI or MT use may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. To pass this assessment, students will be required to demonstrate detailed comprehension of their written submission independent of AI and MT tools.

 ***Marking criteria and/or marking rubrics are available in the ‘Assessment’ folder in Blackboard for this course

Hurdle requirements

Failure to submit all major assessment items (those worth 15% and above) will result in a maximum grade of 2 (Fail).

Submission guidelines

Please submit your completed assignment through the appropriate submission link on Blackboard.

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

Extension applications must be via my.UQ –> Manage my program - > exams and assessment -> Applying for an extension. 

Extension applications must be submitted at least 24 hours prior to the submission date, unless the medical or other circumstances are such that the student cannot reasonably be expected to have applied by the appropriate due date.

Extension requests may take up to 48 hours to be assessed (not including weekends and public holidays).

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Final Exam

  • Hurdle
  • Identity Verified
  • In-person
Mode
Written
Category
Examination
Weight
35%
Due date

End of Semester Exam Period

8/11/2025 - 22/11/2025

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Task description

The final exam for LATN3002 will be 2 hours in duration, plus 10 mins reading time scheduled by Central Examinatins and held on campus. 

The final exam for LATN3002 will consist of the translation of a passage from Vergil's Aeneid 6 previously worked on in class and an unseen passage. You will be expected to answer questions regarding mythological/historical allusions, context, genre conventions, as well as parsing and scansion as directed, to demonstrate understanding of the text.


This assessment task is to be completed in-person. The use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Translation (MT) tools will not be permitted. Any attempted use of AI or MT may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.

 ***Marking criteria and/or marking rubrics are available in the ‘Assessment’ folder in Blackboard for this course


Hurdle requirements

Failure to submit all major assessment items (those worth 15% and above) will result in a maximum grade of 2 (Fail).

Exam details

Planning time 10 minutes
Duration 120 minutes
Calculator options

No calculators permitted

Open/closed book Closed book examination - no written materials permitted
Exam platform Paper based
Invigilation

Invigilated in person

Submission guidelines

Deferral or extension

You may be able to defer this exam.

Course Coordinators are not able to approve deferred exams.Extension applications must be via my.UQ –> Manage my program - > exams and assessment

Course grading

Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.

Grade Cut off Percent Description
1 (Low Fail) 0 - 24

Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 1, Low Fail (0-24%), is generally awarded in cases where some assessment has been submitted, but it is of wholly unsatisfactory standard or quantity. In work submitted, however, there is no demonstrated evidence of understanding of the concepts of the field of study or basic requirements of the course.

2 (Fail) 25 - 44

Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 2, Fail (25-44%), is generally awarded to work that exhibits deficiencies in understanding and applying the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study, and as such, does not satisfy the basic requirements of the course. Often, one or more major items of assessment will not have been completed.

3 (Marginal Fail) 45 - 49

Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes

Course grade description: Grade 3, Marginal Fail (45-49%), is generally awarded if a student has submitted work that attempts to meet the knowledge and skill requirements of the course, but is only able to demonstrate a superficial understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course. Students will usually have attempted all major pieces of assessment and show that they have an identifiable, emerging ability to apply basic knowledge and skills.

4 (Pass) 50 - 64

Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 4, Pass (50-64%), is generally awarded where all major items of assessment have been submitted. An adequate knowledge of the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study should be demonstrated and a functional skill level achieved.

5 (Credit) 65 - 74

Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 5, Credit (65-74%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and a substantial understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course and field of study have been demonstrated.

6 (Distinction) 75 - 84

Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 6, Distinction (75-84%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and substantial knowledge of the deeper and more complex aspects of the course and field of study have been demonstrated.

7 (High Distinction) 85 - 100

Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Grade 7, High Distinction (85-100%), is generally awarded where all items of assessment have been completed and there is evidence that the deeper and more complex aspects of the course and field of study have been mastered.

Additional course grading information

Class Participation Criteria and Marking:

Your Class participation will be assessed according to the following criteria: 

1.    Evidence of participation in discussions

2.    Preparation of and translation in class of set lines, in conjunction with leadership of discussion pertaining to points of grammar, literary technique, literary and historical, cultural and or social allusion, and context. Students are not expected to be accurate all the time, and should feel free to raise problems as part of their translation and discussion

3.    Evidence of preparation for the language class, most notably through the preparation of Latin text(s) for weekly classes in addition to their individually assigned lines

4.    Quality of contributions to discussions.

5.    Fostering of group discussions, through courteous and respectful interactions with staff and    students.

6.    Attendance is necessary to fulfill the above criteria, as per the course requirements, but marks cannot be awarded for attendance alone.

 

To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your attendance will be flawless and your participation exceptional. This grade reflects exceptional levels of preparation, mastery of course materials, and very high-quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions. You should be able to engage with your peers very effectively.

To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75-84) your attendance will be excellent and your participation very substantial. This grade reflects excellent levels of preparation, knowledge of course materials, and high-quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions. You should be able to engage with your peers effectively.

To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65 – 74%), your attendance and participation will be good. This grade reflects proficient levels of preparation, good knowledge of course materials, and good quality contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.

To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50 – 64%) your attendance and participation will be satisfactory. This grade reflects adequate levels of preparation and knowledge of course materials, and an acceptable quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.

To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%) your attendance and participation will be unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation and superficial knowledge of course materials and basic levels of preparation. However, when in attendance, there is evidence of your ability to demonstrate developing achievement in contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.

To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your attendance and participation will be very unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation, minimal knowledge of course materials, little evidence of preparation, and mixed to low quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.

To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your attendance and participation will be unsatisfactory. This grade reflects irregular attendance and/or participation, an no evidence of preparation, and little or no evidence of quality of contributions to, and fostering of, group discussions.

Failing Criteria and Academic Misconduct

Students who use Machine Translation and/or AI to complete assessment or unapproved learning tasks will fail to meet the core learning outcomes for the course and may also be referred for academic misconduct. Students who fabricate or misrepresent their work will receive an automatic maximum grade 2 for this assessment, regardless of the performance in other criteria.



Scansion Test 

Your scansion test will be assessed according to the following criteria:

  1. Ability to identify relevant metre.
  2. Familiarity with rules of relevant metre.
  3. Ability to apply rules in scansion to lines of poetry.
  4. Ability to interpret the effect of metre on the meaning of the text.

 

To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your test should demonstrate an excellent ability to identify metrical constructions, to apply metrical rules to the scansion of poetry and reveal an excellent understanding of how metre affects/enhances the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75-84%), your test should demonstrate a very good ability to identify metrical constructions, to apply metrical rules to the scansion of poetry and reveal a very good understanding of how metre affects/enhances the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65-74%), your test should demonstrate a proficient ability to identify metrical constructions, to apply metrical rules to the scansion of poetry and reveal a proficient understanding of how metre affects/enhances the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50-64%), your test should demonstrate a functional ability to identify metrical constructions, to apply metrical rules to the scansion of poetry and reveal a functional understanding of how metre affects/enhances the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, or 45-49%), your test will have demonstrated that you have only a superficial and faulty ability to identify metrical constructions, to apply metrical rules to the scansion of poetry and reveal a superficial understanding of how metre affects/enhances the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your test will have demonstrated that you have a deficient ability to identify metrical constructions and to apply metrical rules to the scansion of poetry and a deficient understanding of how metre affects/enhances the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your test will have demonstrated that you have a clearly deficient ability to identify or are unable to identify metrical constructions or to apply metrical rules to the scansion of poetry and reveal a limited or clearly deficient understanding of how metre affects/enhances the meaning of poetry. 

Failing Criteria and Academic Misconduct

Fabrication or misrepresentation of sources will result in an automatic maximum grade of 2 for this assessment, regardless of performance in other criteria. This includes but is not limited to: citing non-existent sources or attributing false quotes to real sources. Such issues demonstrate failure to meet the core learning outcomes for the course and may also be referred for academic misconduct

 

Performance Assessment Criteria and Marking:

Your Performance Task will be assessed according to the following criteria:

1.    Ability to identify relevant metre and literary devices.

2.    Familiarity with the rules of relevant metre.

3.    Ability to apply rules in the scansion of lines of poetry.

4.    Ability to perform the passage with reference to the relevant metre and meaning.

5.    Ability to interpret the effect of literary devices and metre on the meaning of the text.

6.    Ability to produce an accurate, informed translation that is sensitive to the poetic character of the text.

 

To achieve a grade of 7 (High Distinction, 85-100%), your performance should demonstrate an excellent ability to identify metrical constructions and literary devices, and to apply metrical rules to the scansion and recitation of poetry. Your performance will also reveal an excellent understanding of how metre and literary devices affect/enhance the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 6 (Distinction, 75-84%), your performance should demonstrate a very good ability to identify metrical constructions and literary devices, and to apply metrical rules to the scansion and recitation of poetry. Your performance will also reveal a very good understanding of how metre and literary devices affect/enhance the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 5 (Credit, 65-74%), your performance should demonstrate a proficient ability to identify metrical constructions and literary devices, and to apply metrical rules to the scansion and recitation of poetry. Your performance will also reveal a proficient understanding of how metre and literary devices affect/enhance the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 4 (Pass, 50-64%), your performance should demonstrate a functional ability to identify metrical constructions and literary devices, and to apply metrical rules to the scansion and recitation of poetry. Your performance will also reveal a functional understanding of how metre and literary devices affect/enhance the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, or 45-49%), your performance will have demonstrated that you have only a superficial and faulty ability to identify metrical constructions and literary devices, and to apply metrical rules to the scansion and recitation of poetry. Your performance will also reveal a superficial and faulty understanding of how metre and literary devices affect/enhance the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%), your performance will have demonstrated that you have a deficient ability to identify metrical constructions and literary devices, and to apply metrical rules to the scansion and recitation of poetry. Your performance will also reveal a deficient understanding of how metre and literary devices affect/enhance the meaning of poetry.

To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your performance will have demonstrated that you have a clearly deficient ability to identify or are unable to identify metrical constructions and literary devices, and are unable to apply metrical rules to the scansion and recitation of poetry. Your performance will also reveal an inability to understand or clearly deficient understanding of how metre and literary devices affect/enhance the meaning of poetry.


Failing Criteria and Academic Misconduct

Fabrication or misrepresentation of sources will result in an automatic maximum grade of 2 for this assessment, regardless of performance in other criteria. This includes but is not limited to: citing non-existent sources or attributing false quotes to real sources. Such issues demonstrate failure to meet the core learning outcomes for the course and may also be referred for academic misconduct.



Critical Essay Criteria and Marking:

Your essay will be assessed according to the following criteria: 

1.     Depth and breadth of understanding of central issues raised by the texts(s) set for analysis

2.     Deep critical analytical engagement with text(s) in Latin, demonstrating an understanding of the vocab, grammar, literary style and techniques, and relevant context(s)

3.     Ability to translate the Latin text(s) into English

4.     Ability to form a well-structured essay following discipline conventions with a clearly defined argument supported by evidence and using correct grammar and syntax

To achieve a grade of 7 (85-100%) your essay should reflect an exceptional level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you are able to form a very rigorous, well-organised argument, and that your discussion is original and creative. Your essay should demonstrate a very high level of advanced reading and translation skills, a deep awareness of both different modes of historical writing, and the political, social, cultural and/or ethical underpinnings or implications of the text(s). Writing, presentation and referencing should be of a very high standard, with minimal, if any, errors and strict attention paid to referencing conventions.

To achieve a grade of 6 (75-84%) your essay should reflect an advanced level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you are able to form a rigorous, well-organised argument, and that your discussion is coherent and convincing. Your essay should demonstrate a high level of advanced reading and translation skills, a substantial awareness of both different modes of historical writing, and the political, social, cultural and/or ethical underpinnings or implications of the text(s). Writing, presentation and referencing should be of a high standard, with minimal, if any, errors and very good attention paid to referencing conventions.

To achieve a grade of 5 (65-74%) your essay should reflect a proficient level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have undertaken the expected level of research, that you are able to develop or adapt convincing arguments and justify them adequately. Your essay should demonstrate a proficient level of advanced reading and translation skills, a proficient awareness of both different modes of historical writing, and the political, social, cultural and/or ethical underpinnings or implications of the text(s). The presentation and referencing of your essay will largely follow discipline conventions, perhaps have some errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation, and demonstrate your ability to communicate effectively.

To achieve a grade of 4 (50-64%) your essay should reflect a functional level of achievement. It should demonstrate that you are able to apply fundamental concepts and skills, that you have undertaken a basic level of research, and that you are able to develop routine arguments and identify problems. Your essay should demonstrate a functional level of advanced reading and translation skills, an adequate awareness of both different modes of historical writing, and the political, social, cultural and/or ethical underpinnings or implications of the text(s). Your organisation, writing, referencing, spelling and grammar will be adequate and use some of the discipline conventions to communicate appropriately.

To achieve a grade of 3 (Marginal Fail, 45 – 49%), your essay should reflect developing levels of achievement. It should demonstrate that you have a superficial knowledge of fundamental concepts and skills, that you have undertaken a basic level of research, made some attempt to evaluate data and/or evidence, to identify problems and issues, and to offer insights. Your arguments, while underdeveloped, show your emerging ability to apply knowledge and skills. Your essay should demonstrate a developing level of advanced reading and translation skills, a developing awareness of both different modes of historical writing, and the political, social, cultural and/or ethical underpinnings or implications of the text(s). Your organisation, writing, spelling and grammar will be adequate, perhaps poor, and your referencing and use of discipline conventions poor/and or inconsistent. Your work will fail to adequately demonstrate independent analysis and argumentation that arises from your own engagement with and synthesis of source materials or assessment stimuli. Your work will have inconsistencies and contradictions. You will demonstrate a mostly stereotypical and/or superficial understanding of concepts, ideas, and source materials/stimuli, failing to demonstrate engagement with sources in their disciplinary context. The overall response will not adequately address the task. This grade is assigned for a total (sum of all the assessment components) in the range 45-49%. See assessment components for specific grading criteria.

To achieve a grade of 2 (Fail, 25-44%) your essay will reflect deficiencies in skill acquisition and in your understanding of the fundamental concepts of the course. It will demonstrate that you have not undertaken adequate research, that you are unable read, translate, and critically evaluate Latin text(s) at an advanced level. Your essay will demonstrate a poor awareness of both different modes of historical writing, and the political, social, cultural and/or ethical underpinnings or implications of the text(s). Your arguments will be unsupported and/or inappropriate, your organisation and writing will be poor and/or inappropriate and referencing and use of discipline conventions poor/and or inconsistent. Your work will fail to adequately demonstrate independent analysis and argumentation that arises from your own engagement with and synthesis of source materials or assessment stimuli. You will demonstrate a mostly stereotypical and/or superficial understanding of concepts, ideas, and source materials/stimuli, failing to demonstrate engagement with sources in their disciplinary context. Your work will have inconsistencies and contradictions The overall response will not adequately address the task. This grade is assigned for a total (sum of all the assessment components) in the range 25-44%. See assessment components for specific grading criteria

To achieve a grade of 1 (Low Fail, 0-24%), your essay will reflect that you have failed to meet the minimum learning requirements and skill acquisition for this course. Your essay will demonstrate an absence of research, evaluation of data and/or evidence, and lack argumentation. Your essay will demonstrate no awareness of both different modes of historical writing, and the political, social, cultural and/or ethical underpinnings or implications of the text(s). Use of discipline conventions will be absent, poor or inappropriate, and written expression poor or inappropriate.

Failing Criteria and Academic Misconduct

Students who use Machine Translation and/or AI to complete assessment or unapproved learning tasks will fail to meet the core learning outcomes for the course and may also be referred for academic misconduct. Students who fabricate or misrepresent their work will receive an automatic maximum grade 2 for this assessment, regardless of the performance in other criteria.

Supplementary assessment

Supplementary assessment is available for this course.

Additional assessment information

  • The only form of Supplementary Assessment is a Final Exam.
  • Supplementary assessment for this course will be in the form of the final exam only. Students must apply as instructed https://my.uq.edu.au/information-and-services/manage-my-program/exams-and-assessment/ and be available during the University’s Deferred and Supplementary examination period.
  • Failure to submit all major assessment items (those worth 15% and above) will result in a maximum grade of 2 (Fail).
  • By submitting work through Turnitin you are deemed to have accepted the following declaration: ‘I certify that this assignment is my own work and has not been submitted, either previously or concurrently, in whole or in part, to this University or any other educational institution, for marking or assessment’.
  • All students must ensure that they receive their Turnitin receipt on every submission of assessment items. YOU MUST CHECK THAT THE RECEIPT CONFIRMS THAT SUBMISSION HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL.
  • A valid Turnitin receipt will be the only evidence accepted if assessments are missing.

Without evidence, the assessment will receive the standard late penalty, or after 7 calendar days, will receive zero. In the case of a Blackboard outage, please contact the Course Coordinator as soon as possible so that they can confirm the outage with ITS.

  • It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that they are submitting assessment items on a device that is capable of the task, and that appropriate internet bandwidth and speed is available. If you cannot be sure that your device or internet will enable you to complete or submit an assessment task, you must come onto campus and use one of the University Computers in the Library or Computer Labs.
  • Plagiarism, and asking or paying someone else to do your work is cheating and constitutes academic misconduct. See ECP Section 6.1
  • Feedback against the assessment criteria in the form of comments on your script will be provided through Turnitin or on your script directly.
  • For information on assessment remarks see: https://my.uq.edu.au/information-and-services/manage-my-program/exams-and-assessment/querying-result

Learning resources

You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.

Library resources

Library resources are available on the UQ Library website.

Additional learning resources information

Students will have access to the set text via Blackboard.

Students will have access to UQ Extend for this course.

Students are required to attend class each week, to prepare the texts set down for translation,ᅠand to participate in class discussions with the lecturer and fellow students.

Learning activities

The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.

Filter activity type by

Please select
Clear filters
Learning period Activity type Topic
Week 1

(28 Jul - 03 Aug)

Lecture

Introduction to the Course, Vergil and Scansion

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Introduction to the course, and translation and analysis of lines 1-39.

Required reading: Bassnett, S. 2025. 'Defying the Odds: How Classical Epics Continue to Survive in the Modern World' in R. H. Armstrong, A. Lianeri (eds.) A Companion to the Translation of Classical Epic, Chap. 3 (p.26-35) available through the UQ library.

Please have lines 1-39 translated for this first class.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Week 2

(04 Aug - 10 Aug)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 40-101

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of lines 40-101.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Week 3

(11 Aug - 17 Aug)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 101-159

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of 101-159.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Week 4

(18 Aug - 24 Aug)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 160-219

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of lines 160 -219

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Week 5

(25 Aug - 31 Aug)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 220-281

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of lines 220-281

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Week 6

(01 Sep - 07 Sep)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 282-342

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of lines 282-342

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Week 7

(08 Sep - 14 Sep)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 343-404

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of lines 343-404

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Week 8

(15 Sep - 21 Sep)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 405-465

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of lines 405-465

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Week 9

(22 Sep - 28 Sep)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 466-527

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of lines 466-527

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Mid Sem break

(29 Sep - 05 Oct)

Practical

Mid-Semester Break (RELAX!)

no class this week

Week 10

(06 Oct - 12 Oct)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 528-586

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of lines 528-586

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Week 11

(13 Oct - 19 Oct)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 587-646

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of lines 587-646

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Week 12

(20 Oct - 26 Oct)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 647-709

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of lines 647-709

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Week 13

(27 Oct - 02 Nov)

Practical

Vergil, Aeneid 6 lines 710-721, 860-901

Interactive Language Class (Blend of Lecture, Translation, and Parsing, Q & A)

Translation and analysis of lines 710-721, 860-901

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04, L05

Additional learning activity information

These passages are a guide only. Progress though the translation will depend on difficulty of translation, discussion and analysis of passages, and student commitment to weekly set lines.

Policies and procedures

University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:

Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.