Course overview
- Study period
- Semester 1, 2025 (24/02/2025 - 21/06/2025)
- Study level
- Undergraduate
- Location
- St Lucia
- Attendance mode
- In Person
- Units
- 2
- Administrative campus
- St Lucia
- Coordinating unit
- Law School
Legal context of some issues confronting contemporary society. Possible changes available to enable law to deal more adequately with novel problems. Topics vary from year to year.
The topic in Semester 1, 2025 is: Law and Literature
Course Aims:
This subject addresses the intersection of law and popular culture, exploring the extent to which latter – film, television, fiction – provides a way to read, understand and rethink the former: namely, law, legal process and, above all, jurisprudence. Its topics include, for example, the legal significance and/or subtext of such popular culture figures as alien invaders, living dolls, Norse gods, ghostly apparitions, zombie hordes, telekinetic psychics, undead lovers, dystopian gamers, dark lords and daimonic companions. All of which are analysed through the interpretive jurisprudential lens of, variously, rights, duties, justice, law’s morality, the laws of nature and legal critique. In reading these figures of law ‘jurisprudentially’, Speculative Legalism draws extensively upon the hermeneutical resources of canonical and critical legal theory, as well as a range of other theoretical perspectives and positions current in the humanities and social sciences: to name a few, psychoanalysis, feminism, race theory, post-colonialism and semiotics.
This subject has as its principal aims:
• To introduce students to the cultural representation of the law in a range of speculative genres: science fiction, fantasy and horror.
• To broaden students’ notion of law by examining, not only law’s socio-legal representation in a range of speculative fictions (e.g., the role of the lawyer, the nature of the trial, etc…), but law’s jurisprudential subtexts (e.g., the notion of a higher justice, the idea of rights, etc…) in those texts.
• To foster students’ critical capacities by examining the myriad ways in which speculative legal fictions put the law on trial, or judge jurisprudence and find it wanting.
• To enable students to grow as independent legal thinkers who can not only critique the law but construct alternatives by using speculative fictions to reimagine law and jurisprudence along fairer, more just lines.
Course requirements
Prerequisites
You'll need to complete the following courses before enrolling in this one:
All Level 1 & 2 LAWS courses
Incompatible
You can't enrol in this course if you've already completed the following:
LAWS7182 or 7382
Restrictions
Restricted to enrolments in LLB(Hons)(#64), LLB(Hons)(#48), LLB, LLB (Graduate Entry), LLB(Hons) duals and LLB dual programs.
Course contact
Course staff
Course coordinator
Timetable
The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.
Aims and outcomes
Teaching Mission Statement
The mission of the TC Beirne School of Law is to educate students in and about the law. We seek to assist you to think critically about the law and to investigate its structures, principles, policies, and values. This is achieved by engaging with you as fellow investigators in a range of critical and intellectual conversations about the law and its place in society. Our role is thus to guide you in your own intellectual journey in the law and to equip you with the necessary skills that will enable you to continue that journey long after you have left the School.
Course Aims:
Speculative Legalism: Law in Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror (aka LAWS5182 Special Topic A, Law and Literature) addresses a range of popular fictions – in print and on screen – because, by means of plot, characterisation, setting and theme, these texts interrogate in unique and innovative ways the abiding questions of legal theory. To name but a few: what is the connection between law and morality? Law and power? Law and rights? Law and justice? By examining how the speculative fictions of science fiction, horror and fantasy pose and repose such questions, this course invites students to critique and reimagine notions of, for example, the legal subject, legal things, legal processes, legal origins and ends. Enabling this critical legal act of reimagination will be popular culture’s textual, televisual and cinematic tropes of dying deities and death-dealing aliens, vampire slayers and zombie hordes, white wizards and dark lords, ghostbusters and ‘battle royale’ gamers, living dolls and telekinetic psychics. In short, the gods and monsters, freaks and geeks of Speculative Legalism invites us to speculate, otherwise, on the very nature of law itself.
Learning outcomes
After successfully completing this course you should be able to:
LO1.
Students will be able to ‘read’, critically, a speculative text—be it science fiction, horror or fantasy—as a kind of legal fiction.
LO2.
Students will become adept in the techniques of close textual analysis, e.g., character, plot, theme.
LO3.
Students will be able to contextualise close, critical readings of speculative fictions in terms of the law’s principal socio-legal (e.g., lawyers, courts) and jurisprudential (e.g., justice, rights) topics.
LO4.
Though such critical readings of speculative texts, students will be able to reimagine fairer, juster legality, combusting tired shibboleths of the law and constructing bold and bright alternatives.
LO5.
Students will become truly interdisciplinary critical legal scholars through their exposure to, appreciation of, and critical engagement with two fields: cultural studies and law.
LO6.
By examining how texts from each field read each other, otherwise, students will have achieved a powerful and rigorous cultural understanding of law, as well as a legal understanding of culture.
Assessment
Assessment summary
Category | Assessment task | Weight | Due date |
---|---|---|---|
Essay/ Critique |
Research Essay
|
50% |
28/04/2025 2:00 pm |
Examination |
Final Exam (Central)
|
50% |
End of Semester Exam Period 7/06/2025 - 21/06/2025 |
Assessment details
Research Essay
- Online
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Essay/ Critique
- Weight
- 50%
- Due date
28/04/2025 2:00 pm
Task description
There is a 2500-word essay in this course worth 50% of your overall mark in the course. The essay is due on Monday 28 April 2025 at 2pm.
Below are a range of essay questions to choose from. Feel free to construct your own topic but, first, seek my approval.
Please ensure that your essay is double-spaced, has a cover sheet, is appropriately footnoted and has a bibliography. Ensure that your name and student number are on the paper. As to footnoting and bibliography, please use standard Law School Citation Guide.
Twelve essay questions are appended below as well as included in the Course Syllabus posted on the course website under Learning Resources.
- Where is ‘God’s Law’ in Speculative Legalism? Discuss with reference to three texts.
- Compare and contrast the vampire and the zombie as subjects of law.
- What is the connection, if any, between law and power in speculative fiction? Discuss with reference to at least three texts from the course syllabus.
- Compare and contrast the theme of psychic connection in three of the texts from the course syllabus.
- How are rights represented in, and critiqued by at least three of the texts from the course syllabus.
- To what extent does science fiction, horror and or fantasy challenge—or confirm—the notion of a ‘higher law’? Refer in your essay to at least three texts from the course syllabus.
- Is distributive justice a central concern of the so-called ‘escapist’ genres of fantasy, horror and science fiction? Discuss with respect to at least three texts from the course syllabus.
- How is ownership - or possession - represented and critiqued either overtly or impliedly in speculative legalism?
- •How is the language(s) of the law dramatised in, and critiqued by at least three of these texts?
- Is ‘the feminine’ forever destined to be outside and/or oppressed by the law in fantasy, horror and science fiction? Discuss with respect to at least three texts from the course syllabus.
- Is revenge a dish best served cold? Discuss this aphorism with respect to three texts, from the course syllabus.
- Devise your own essay topic—but seek the instructor’s permission and approval as to topic.
This assessment task is to be completed in-person. The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools will not be permitted. Any attempted use of AI may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
Submission guidelines
Assignments must be submitted electronically via the submission link on the course Blackboard site.
Deferral or extension
You may be able to apply for an extension.
The maximum extension allowed is 7 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.
Extension to Assessment Due Date
Where an extension for an assessment item due within the teaching period in which the course is offered is available, any extension is limited to one week (7 days). In exceptional circumstances, extensions may be granted for more than one week, but in no case will an extension exceed four weeks (28 days) in total. Where a student is incapacitated for a period exceeding four weeks of the teaching period, they should apply for removal of course.
A student may apply for an extension to assessment due date if they are unable to meet an assessment deadline due to extenuating circumstances. Please refer to the Applying for an extension page on my.UQ for further details on acceptable reasons for an extension and for instructions on how to apply. Additional information on extensions can be found within the Assessment Procedure.
Spoken or written notification of difficulties with assessment deadlines to a course coordinator or the School does not constitute an authorised extension.
Applications to be submitted before the due date: Applications for extension (whether they be medical or exceptional circumstances) shall be made by the due date and time for the assessment. Requests for extensions received after the assessment item submission due date and time, must include evidence of the reason for the late request, and will require the decision maker listed in the Student Grievance Resolution Procedure to accept the request for consideration.
Late submission
A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.
Penalties for Late Submission
The following penalties apply to late submission of an assessment item, assuming that an extension has not been approved, and that late submission is academically possible (e.g., it does not delay feedback to a cohort, or interfere with course delivery).
First 7 periods of 24 hours (or part thereof) - 10% per 24 hours of the maximum possible mark for the assessment item. For example, a report worth a maximum of 40 marks, submitted 28 hours late will attract a penalty of 8 marks, calculated as 2 periods of 24 hours x 10% x 40 marks.
More than 7 periods of 24 hours - 100%.
Final Exam (Central)
- In-person
- Mode
- Written
- Category
- Examination
- Weight
- 50%
- Due date
End of Semester Exam Period
7/06/2025 - 21/06/2025
Task description
There is a final examination in this course worth 50% of your overall grade.
The final examination is closed-book, lasts for 2 hours and consists of two parts:
Part A:
Part A is worth 20% of the examination and consists of 15 short answer questions. Examinees are required to answer 10 of the questions. Your answer should be no longer than a few sentences and/or short paragraph.
Part B
Part B is worth 80% of the examination and consists of five essay questions. Examinees are required to answer 2 of the questions, worth 40% each.
This assessment task is to be completed in-person. The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools will not be permitted. Any attempted use of AI may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.
Exam details
Planning time | 10 minutes |
---|---|
Duration | 120 minutes |
Calculator options | No calculators permitted |
Open/closed book | Closed Book examination - no written materials permitted |
Exam platform | Paper based |
Invigilation | Invigilated in person |
Submission guidelines
Deferral or extension
You may be able to defer this exam.
Course grading
Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.
Grade | Cut off Percent | Description |
---|---|---|
1 (Low Fail) | 0 - 19 |
Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. |
2 (Fail) | 20 - 47 |
Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes. |
3 (Marginal Fail) | 48 - 49 |
Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes |
4 (Pass) | 50 - 64 |
Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes. |
5 (Credit) | 65 - 74 |
Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes. |
6 (Distinction) | 75 - 84 |
Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes. |
7 (High Distinction) | 85 - 100 |
Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes. |
Supplementary assessment
Supplementary assessment is available for this course.
Learning resources
You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.
Library resources
Library resources are available on the UQ Library website.
Learning activities
The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.
Filter activity type by
Please select
Learning period | Activity type | Topic |
---|---|---|
Week 2 |
Lecture |
Lecture 1 ALIENS: Promethean Longing: Ridley’s Scott’s Speculative Legalism in Prometheus Prometheus (film, US, 20th Century Fox 2012, Scott) |
Week 3 |
Lecture |
Lecture 2 AUTOMATA: ‘Life in Plastic, It's Ph/Fantastic’: Barbie, the Death Drive and the Law of Desire Barbie (film, US, Warner Bros, 2023, Gerwig) |
Week 4 |
Lecture |
Lecture 3 GODS: Theologising with a Hammer: Deicide, the W/Hole of Creation and Judeo-Christian Nihilism in Thor: Love and Thunder Thor: Love and Thunder (film, Marvel Studios, 2022, Feige & Winderbaum) |
Week 5 |
Lecture |
Lecture 4 GHOSTS: Remembering a (Queer) Life Never Lived: The Invention of Memory in All of Us Strangers All of Us Strangers (film, Blueprint Pictures/Film4/Searchlight Picture 2023, Haigh) |
Week 6 |
Lecture |
Lecture 5 ZOMBIES: The Litigating Dead in The Walking Dead, and World War Z The Walking Dead (TV series, US, HBO 2010-present, Darabont, et.al.), Series 1, Episode 1 ‘Days Gone By’ Max Brooks, World War Z: An Oral History (Crown Publishers, 2006), esp sections entitled “The Great Panic’ and ‘Home Front USA’ World War Z (film, US/Malta, Paramount 2013, Forster) |
Week 7 |
Lecture |
Lecture 6 TELEPATHS: ‘Plug it up!’: The Jouissance of Revenge in Carrie Stephen King. Carrie (New York: Doubleday, 1974). Carrie (film, USA, Red Bank Films, 1976, De Palma). |
Week 8 |
Lecture |
Lecture 7 VAMPIRES: The Law of the Undead in True Blood, the ‘Twilight’ series, and The Passage True Blood (TV series, USA, HBO 2008-2014), created Alan Ball, starring Anna Paquin, Ryan Kwanten, Stephen Moyer, Series 1, Episode 1, ‘Strange Love’; Series 7, Episode 10, ‘Thank You” Twilight (film, US, Summit Entertainment 2008, Hardwicke), Justin Cronin, The Passage (London, Orion, 2010), esp chs 1,2, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 23, 55, 67, 68, 69. |
Week 9 |
Lecture |
Lecture 8 GAMERS: The Rite of Rights in The Hunger Games The Hunger Games (film, US, Lionsgate 2012, Ross) |
Week 10 |
Lecture |
Lecture 9 WIZARDS: Gandalf, Sauron and the Ring-as-Grundnorm in The Lord of the Rings The Lord of the Rings -The Fellowship of the Ring (film, US/NZ, New Line 2001, Jackson) |
Week 11 |
Lecture |
Lecture 10 DAIMONS: The War in Heaven-as-Metaphor in Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials His Dark Materials (TV, UK, BBC 1, 2019-2022, Tranter, Emmerich, et.al.), Series 1, Episode 1, ‘Lyra’s Jordan’; Series 3, Episode 8, ‘The Botanic Gardens’ |
Policies and procedures
University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:
- Student Code of Conduct Policy
- Student Integrity and Misconduct Policy and Procedure
- Assessment Procedure
- Examinations Procedure
- Reasonable Adjustments - Students Policy and Procedure
Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.
School guidelines
Your school has additional guidelines you'll need to follow for this course: