Skip to menu Skip to content Skip to footer
Course profile

The Political Dynamics of Development and Resistance (POLS2404)

Study period
Sem 2 2025
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person

Course overview

Study period
Semester 2, 2025 (28/07/2025 - 22/11/2025)
Study level
Undergraduate
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person
Units
2
Administrative campus
St Lucia
Coordinating unit
Politic Sc & Internat Studies

This course examines the political dynamics of development and resistance. We examine development as a contradictory and contested project with global and local dimensions. The course introduces critical frameworks of analysis for understanding and evaluating development policies and practices, and resistances to injustices these engender. We combine relational and critical historical analysis with insights from political economy and postcolonial/decolonial thought and politics, and critically engage with conventional development theories and policies. Throughout the course, we draw on examples, including for instance big issues such as hunger and the food sovereignty movement, indigenous water defender movements, campaigns for 'rights to the city', labour and movements for social protections, and the struggles of the landless movement. A key objective of this course is to enable us to think about development in new and potentially transformative ways, aligned with decolonial struggles for justice in and over development and inequality.

This course critically examines development as a contested and deeply political process shaped by historical legacies, global inequalities, and grassroots resistance. It introduces students to the political dynamics of development and resistance at local, national, regional, and global levels, with a strong emphasis on the relevance of decolonial and postcolonial thought.

Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives—including feminist political economy, post-development theory, ontological politics, and climate justice—the course explores how development is experienced, institutionalised, resisted, and reimagined across diverse contexts. Through carefully selected case studies and Indigenous communities, we will investigate how power, identity, and knowledge intersect in shaping development outcomes.

We will explore how different political development objectives inter-relate and how they are enacted not only by formal political actors but also through everyday practices and resistance movements. This includes examining the cultural, social, and identity-based dimensions of development and inequality.

A key objective of the course is to enable students to think about development in new and potentially transformative ways, aligned with global and local struggles for justice. Emphasis is placed on applied learning through collaborative research, hands-on tutorials, group case studies, and multimedia presentations. Students will also engage with digital tools to analyse contemporary resistance movements and alternative development pathways, while developing communication and policy analysis skills relevant to careers in development, advocacy, and public policy.

Please refer to Learning Activities to review the exciting list of topics covered in the course.ᅠ

Course requirements

Recommended prerequisites

We recommend completing the following courses before enrolling in this one:

2 units POLS course

Course staff

Course coordinator

Lecturer

Tutor

Timetable

The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.

Additional timetable information

This course has 12 lectures and 8 tutorials. The Ekka Holiday week is an open reading week. Please refer to Learning Activities.

Aims and outcomes

This course aims to introduce students to in-depth analysis of the politics of development, emphasising both empirical and conceptual concerns. Students are introduced to historical trajectories underpinning contemporary constellations, problems and approaches in global development politics and policy. Overall, the course aims to demonstrate the intricate linkage between theories and practices of 'development', and their intrinsic dynamics of political power.

Assessment

Assessment summary

Category Assessment task Weight Due date
Participation/ Student contribution, Quiz, Tutorial/ Problem Set Tutorial participation
  • In-person
35% Tutorial Participation 16%; a In-class Quizzes total 19% each 9.5%

Tutorial Participation 6/08/2025 - 10/10/2025

Quiz 1 27/08/2025 - 29/08/2025

Quiz 2 24/09/2025 - 26/09/2025

Paper/ Report/ Annotation, Essay/ Critique, Project Group Case Study Analysis of Development Resistance
  • Team or group-based
40% 10% Draft Plan week 7; 25% Case Study Submission Week 10; 5% Peer review Form completed Week 10

Draft Research Plan 12/09/2025 5:00 pm

Final Essay 7/10/2025 2:00 pm

Peer Review Form 7/10/2025 4:30 pm

Creative Production/ Exhibition, Presentation Video Presentation
  • Identity Verified
  • In-person
  • Online
25%

Video Submission 28/10/2025 2:00 pm

Online Q&A Session 29/10/2025 10:00 am

Assessment details

Tutorial participation

  • In-person
Mode
Oral, Written
Category
Participation/ Student contribution, Quiz, Tutorial/ Problem Set
Weight
35% Tutorial Participation 16%; a In-class Quizzes total 19% each 9.5%
Due date

Tutorial Participation 6/08/2025 - 10/10/2025

Quiz 1 27/08/2025 - 29/08/2025

Quiz 2 24/09/2025 - 26/09/2025

Other conditions
Time limited, Secure.

See the conditions definitions

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L04

Task description

Tutorial Participation and In-Class Quizzes

You will receive a total of 35 points for tutorial participation as follows:


Tutorial Participation (16%)

Your participation mark is based on both attendance and active engagement during tutorials.

  • You will earn 2 points per tutorial: 1% for attendance and 1% for participation. There are 8 tutorials in total, making up 16% of your final grade.


In-Class Quizzes (19%)

  • You are required to complete two short quizzes during tutorial sessions: Week 5 Quiz and Week 9 Quiz. Each quiz will take 15–20 minutes. Each is worth 9.5%, for a combined total of 19%


Task Description:

The Tutorial Participation mark is based on your attendance and participation. You are expected to attend and actively participate in eight tutorials. Each tutorial includes hands-on activities such as group discussions, mapping exercises, data analysis, and peer feedback. You will also use part of the tutorial time to prepare for your group case study by engaging in team planning, research coordination, and collaborative exercises.

Two short in-class quizzes (Week 5 and Week 9) will assess understanding of key theoretical concepts (e.g., feminist political economy, ontological politics). More information will be available in POLSIS 2404 Blackboard site on the Quiz and tutorial reading.

Please also note the following expectations with regard to tutorials: you are expected to:

  • Arrive on time
  • Demonstrate a willingness to speak or participate in class activities
  • Engage with your peers respectfully

Tutorials can be exciting and intellectually stimulating - the more prepared you are the more you will benefit from the engagement with your group as a whole!

Please note: Preparation in advance for each tutorial -- especially covering the required readings for each topic - will make for better and engaging discussions with your group. These discussions are an invaluable opportunity to engage constructively and respectfully with others in the group. Tutorials also provide an opportunity to address any specific questions that you may have about the readings and / or topic more generally.

Written work in place of tutorial participation:

Students who miss single or multiple tutorials for a valid reason (including illness) may complete a short critical piece of written work in place of participation. For each missed tutorial, write a 250-word reflection on one of the readings for that week and submit to your tutor. Students to contact the Course Coordinator or their tutor if they miss a tutorial or quiz.

Criteria & Marking:

The Tutorial Participation mark is based on your attendance and participation. Please note that it is your responsibility to ensure that you sign-off on the weekly attendance sheet for tutorials that you attend.

Assessment Breakdown:

- 2% per tutorial for attendance and engagement (8 tutorials = 16%)

- 9.5% per quiz (2 quizzes = 19%)

Total tutorial mark: Your tutorial participation marks will be released after the last lecture. It is your responsibility to check your result for this and if you have any queries regarding the final (total) mark for tutorial participation you should contact your tutor by e-mail (this email should be copied to the course coordinator) within a week of the release of the marks for your tutorial participation.

PLEASE NOTE: Assessment tasks are intended to evaluate a student’s abilities, skills, and knowledge. This assessment task is to be completed in-person. The use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Translation (MT) tools will not be permitted when completing the Quiz component. Any attempted use of Ai or MT may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.

Submission guidelines

Please note that it is your responsibility to ensure that you sign-off on the weekly attendance sheet for tutorials that you attend.

The Quizzes should be submitted via POLS2404 Turnitin designated link in Blackboard. Please refer to the Blackboard Site for more information.

In uploading an assignment via Turnitin you are certifying that it is your original work, that it has not been copied in whole or part from another person or source except where this is properly acknowledged, and that it has not in whole or part been previously submitted for assessment in any other course at this or any other university.

When you successfully submit your assessment to Turnitin after previewing the uploaded document (to make sure that you have chosen the correct file), you should see the “Submission Complete!” message. After this, a downloadable Digital Receipt will display on your Assignment Dashboard. It is your responsibility to download the Digital Receipt as proof of submission. Turnitin will not send this receipt to you automatically.

If you don’t see the downloadable receipt on your assignment dashboard, you should regard your submission as unsuccessful.

If the submission was not successful:

  1. Note the error message (preferably take a screenshot).
  2. Go to your assignment page and see if it is possible to submit again.
  3. If you cannot submit again, then email your course coordinator immediately.
Deferral or extension

You cannot defer or apply for an extension for this assessment.

Extension for Quizzes 1 and 2 can be granted for exceptional circumstances. Students to contact the Course Coordinator or their tutor if they miss a tutorial or quiz.

Late submission

You will receive a mark of 0 if this assessment is submitted late.

Group Case Study Analysis of Development Resistance

  • Team or group-based
Mode
Written
Category
Paper/ Report/ Annotation, Essay/ Critique, Project
Weight
40% 10% Draft Plan week 7; 25% Case Study Submission Week 10; 5% Peer review Form completed Week 10
Due date

Draft Research Plan 12/09/2025 5:00 pm

Final Essay 7/10/2025 2:00 pm

Peer Review Form 7/10/2025 4:30 pm

Other conditions
Time limited, Peer assessed.

See the conditions definitions

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L04

Task description

Group Case Study Analysis and Peer Review

Each group of 4-5 students will submit an essay of 2500 words on your chosen case study or policy document in two stages.

Stage 1: Your group will be required to submit a draft research plan or storyboard (500 words) (10%) on Week 7

Stage 2: A final written group essay report (2,000 words) that includes visual component (e.g., map, infographic) (25%) in Week 10.

Each student will be required to submit a peer review form assessing team contributions (5%) in Week 10.


Task Description:

In this group assignment, students will work collaboratively in teams of 4–5 to produce a 2,500-word case study analysis focused on a selected development resistance movement or policy document from a list that will be posted to Blackboard by the Course Coordinator in Week 2. This task is designed to deepen your understanding of how development is contested and reimagined through collective action and alternative frameworks.

Purpose:

This assessment aim is to build your capacity to critically examining development as a political and relational process. It encourages you to apply interdisciplinary theories and analytical tools to real-world struggles for justice, sovereignty, and transformation. Through collaborative research, you will explore how resistance movements challenge dominant development paradigms and propose alternative futures. it also seeks to build your capacity to engage in collaborative research and team work. You will be supported to navigate group dynamics through dedicated check-in times during tutorials.

Task Requirements:

  • Case Selection: Choose one resistance movement or policy document from the provided list posted to Blackboard in Week 2
  • Theoretical Integration: Apply at least two theoretical frameworks discussed in the course (e.g., post-development, climate justice, feminist political economy, decolonial thought) to critically analyse your case.
  • Analytical Component: Your analysis must include one or more of the following:
  • Spatial analysis (e.g., mapping territorial claims or urban struggles)
  • Digital analysis (e.g., examining online activism or platform politics)
  • Quantitative analysis (e.g., using data to support claims about inequality, access, or impact)
  • Structure & Presentation:
  • Clear introduction and background of the case
  • Application of theoretical frameworks
  • Analytical insights using selected methods
  • Conclusion reflecting on broader implications for development and resistance
  • Proper referencing and academic writing style
  • Group Organisation and Planning : Selection of group members will be in Week 2 during the tutorial time, so be there. Case studies and policy documents will be posted to the Blackboard site on Week 2. Selection of case study by the group will be facilitated during the tutorial on Week 4. Two 10-15 minute "group check-in" sessions to facilitate health group dynamics are built in Week 6 and Week 8 Tutorials.
  • Students with exceptional circumstances that impact their ability to participate in the group work will need to inform their tutor or course coordinator and negotiate their contributions with their peers.

Submission Plan

Each group will submit an essay of 2500 words on your chosen case study or policy document. Your group will be required to submit:

Week 7: A draft research plan or storyboard (500 words) (10%) – due Friday 12 Sept 5pm

Week 10: A written report (2,000 words) to include visual component (e.g., map, infographic) (25%) due Tuesday 7 October  2pm

- Week 10: A peer review form assessing team contributions (individual weighting) (5%) due Tuesday 7 October  4:30pm

Presentation: Your essay must be typed (1.5-line-spaced) fully referenced and include a bibliographic list. The Peer Review Form will posted to Blackboard and should be completed by each student

Submission: Please note that submissions have to be made via POLS2404 designated Turnitin Link (Blackboard), using Word-encoding ( .doc, or .docx extensions); .pdf files are not acceptable!!!

Word count: Please ensure that you provide a word count at the end of your essay excluding the bibliographic list.

PLEASE NOTE:

Assessment tasks are intended to evaluate a student’s abilities, skills, and knowledge. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Translation (MT) are emerging tools that may support students in completing this assessment task. Students may appropriately use AI or MT to support their learning and complete this assessment task e.g revision of the authentic assessment or a component of the assessment task. Students must clearly reference any use of generative AI or MT in each instance. Failure to comply with this direction may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.

To pass this assessment, students will be required to critically engage with their specific context beyond the support and guidance of AI and MT tools.

Submission guidelines

Essay topics will be posted on the POLS2404 Blackboard site in advance

Each group should submit one essay through Turnitin via the POLS2404 Blackboard site.

Each student should submit a Peer Review Form via Turnitin under their name. Forms will be posted on POLS2404 Blackboard site

Word count: Please ensure that you provide a word count at the end of your essay excluding the bibliographic list.

The essay should demonstrate a high standard of grammar, spelling and general presentation and conform to the standards set out in the School of Political Science and International Studies.

Submission:

Assignments for this course will be submitted electronically via Blackboard and using Turnitin.

In uploading an assignment via Turnitin you are certifying that it is your original work, that it has not been copied in whole or part from another person or source except where this is properly acknowledged, and that it has not in whole or part been previously submitted for assessment in any other course at this or any other university.

When you successfully submit your assessment to Turnitin after previewing the uploaded document (to make sure that you have chosen the correct file), you should see the “Submission Complete!” message. After this, a downloadable Digital Receipt will display on your Assignment Dashboard. It is your responsibility to download the Digital Receipt as proof of submission. Turnitin will not send this receipt to you automatically.

If you don’t see the downloadable receipt on your assignment dashboard, you should regard your submission as unsuccessful.

If the submission was not successful:

  1. Note the error message (preferably take a screenshot).
  2. Go to your assignment page and see if it is possible to submit again.
  3. If you cannot submit again, then email your course coordinator immediately.
Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

The maximum extension allowed is 28 days. Extensions are given in multiples of 24 hours.

Please note that the next assessment submission is within three weeks so extensions to take that inconsideration.

As this is a group project individual student extension will impact the group performance and incur an unfavourable peer review. Students with exceptional circumstances will need to negotiate with their peers and tutor or course coordinator.

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Unless an extension is granted, penalties for late submission apply. Students are penalised 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item for every calendar day that an assessment item is late.

Marks will be deducted each day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point the submitted item will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is triggered from the time the submission is due.

Video Presentation

  • Identity Verified
  • In-person
  • Online
Mode
Oral, Product/ Artefact/ Multimedia
Category
Creative Production/ Exhibition, Presentation
Weight
25%
Due date

Video Submission 28/10/2025 2:00 pm

Online Q&A Session 29/10/2025 10:00 am

Other conditions
Student specific, Time limited, Peer assessment factor.

See the conditions definitions

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03, L04

Task description

Video Presentation: This assessment is delivered in two stages:

Stage 1: Submit a 5 minute recorded video presentation on a development challenge - (15%)

Stage 2: Participate in a 5 minute online Q&A session on your chosen topic in a Teams breakout room with 4-5 peers (10%)


Task Description

This assessment invites you to critically explore a development challenge in a country you are familiar with, and communicate your findings through a short, engaging multimedia presentation. You will analyse how colonial histories continue to shape economic, social, or environmental conditions today, using an intersectional lens and multimedia tools.

This task encourages critical analysis of development as a contested and historically rooted process. Builds your skill in the application of intersectional and decolonial frameworks. It build your capacity to creatively communicate complex ideas using digital tools.

Task Instructions

Part 1: Pre-recorded Video Presentation (5 minutes) – 15%

Create a short, creative, and visually engaging video that:

  • Introduces a development challenge in a specific country
  • Analyses how colonial legacies continue to shape this issue
  • Applies an intersectional perspective (e.g., race, gender, class, indigeneity)
  • Uses multimedia tools (e.g., visuals, maps, voiceover, data, etc.) to support your analysis


Part 2: Live Q&A Session (5 minutes) – 10%

During the final lecture (Week 13), you will:

  • Join a Teams breakout room with 4–5 peers
  • Play your pre-recorded video
  • Participate in a 5-minute live Q&A, responding to questions from your peers


Presentation: Your video can use graphics, images, maps etc to convey your ideas. Your video should include a reference list. It should demonstrate a high standard of grammar, and general presentation and conform to the standards set out in the School of Political Science and International Studies. Your video will be marked according to the assessment criteria posted in Blackboard.

PLEASE NOTE:

Assessment tasks are intended to evaluate a student’s abilities, skills, and knowledge. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Translation (MT) are emerging tools that may support students in completing this assessment task. Students may appropriately use AI or MT to support their learning and complete this assessment task e.g revision of the authentic assessment or a component of the assessment task. Students must clearly reference any use of generative Ai or MT in each instance. Failure to comply with this direction may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.

To pass this assessment, students will be required to critically engage with their specific context during the Q&A session.

Submission guidelines

Submission:

Video: Record, save, and upload this recording using EchoVideo. For more information on how to use EchoVideo, see: Video Assignments (Original) - eLearning - University of Queensland. Submit a video assignment with EchoVideo (Original) - eLearning - University of Queensland. It is your responsibility to ensure that the video is uploaded and you have proof of submission.

Q&A session: The Q&A session will be online during week 13 Lecture. An online Teams link for the Q&A session will posted in Blackboard closer to the date.

In uploading an assignment using EchoVideo you are certifying that it is your original work, that it has not been copied in whole or part from another person or source except where this is properly acknowledged, and that it has not in whole or part been previously submitted for assessment in any other course at this or any other university.

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

In cases of an extension, the Q&A session will be conducted online with the tutor and / or Lecturer.

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Unless an extension is granted, penalties for late submission apply. Students are penalised 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item for every calendar day that an assessment item is late.

Marks will be deducted each day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point the submitted item will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is triggered from the time the submission is due.

Course grading

Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.

Grade Cut off Percent Description
1 (Low Fail) 1 - 19

Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student does not address the question, shows no evidence of reading and minimal comprehension of the issues at hand.

2 (Fail) 20 - 44

Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student addresses the question poorly and shows very little evidence of reading.

3 (Marginal Fail) 45 - 49

Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes

Course grade description: The student makes an effort to establish a single major argument for the essay and employs some research which is correlated with the argument. Makes a visible effort to achieve adequate grammar, spelling and punctuation. Evidence of attempting to achieve a recognisable narrative flow appears throughout the assignment. The student addresses the question and shows evidence of required research and a basic grasp of the issues at hand. However, falls short of satisfying all basic requirements for a Pass.

4 (Pass) 50 - 64

Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student makes a reasonable effort to provide evidence to support a visible argument and employs an adequate research base to support the argument. Achieves a reasonable, if not completely coherent standard of grammar, spelling, and punctuation. A recognisable narrative flow is sustained throughout the essay. The student answers the question and shows evidence of adequate research and a degree of understanding of the issues at hand.

5 (Credit) 65 - 74

Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student provides suitable evidence to support an argument and employs a comprehensive research base that directly relates to the topic, though it may not completely support the argument. Achieves decent levels of competence in grammar, spelling, punctuation and narrative flow. The student answers the question in a direct, well supported fashion and shows evidence of some wide reading and a reasonable understanding of the issues at hand.

6 (Distinction) 75 - 84

Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student demonstrates a very good grasp of the chosen topic and provides a considerable amount of evidence to support a clearly stated argument. The student employs a reasonably extensive and well-organised research base to structure evidence in support of the argument and achieves a high level of competence in grammar, spelling, punctuation and narrative flow. The student answers the question in a direct, reasonably sophisticated fashion, employs wide research and shows a sound understanding of the issues at hand.

7 (High Distinction) 85 - 100

Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student demonstrates a highly sophisticated grasp of the topic and succeeds in addressing the question by providing a high level of evidence to support a clearly stated argument. The student employs an extensive and well organised research base to structure evidence in support of the argument and achieves impeccable levels of grammar, spelling, punctuation and narrative flow. The student answers the question in a direct and elegant fashion, employs significant research and shows a deep understanding of the issues at hand.

Additional course grading information

Grades will be awarded on the following basis:


1.ᅠFailᅠ 1 - 19%

2. Failᅠ 20 - 44%

3. Failᅠ 45 - 49%

4. Passᅠ 50 - 64 %

5. Creditᅠ 65 - 74 %

6. Distinctionᅠ 75 - 84 %

7. High Distinctionᅠ 85 - 100 %

Supplementary assessment

Supplementary assessment is available for this course.

Additional assessment information

Word Length Penalty

Unless otherwise indicated, in the case of written submissions with a specified word count, you are given a +10% leeway on the upper word limit. If your written submission is over this leeway limit, it will attract a 10 percentage point penalty. For example, if your essay is 1,500 words, you may write up to 1,650 before attracting a word count penalty. If your essay exceeds the upper word limit, it will attract a 10% word count penalty. Therefore, if your essay is worth 40 marks, you will lose 4 marks from your allotted grade. Unless specified, penalties only apply to exceeding the word length, not for failure to write a sufficient amount.

Students should note:

• The Author-date in-text referencing system will count toward the word length;

• References in the Footnote referencing system will not count toward the word length. If you are using footnotes, any content included in footnotes beyond the specific text reference will count towards the word length.

Marking Criteria/Rubric

Marking criteria and/or marking rubrics are available in the ‘Assessment’ folder in Blackboard for this course.

Learning resources

You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.

Library resources

Library resources are available on the UQ Library website.

Additional learning resources information

Essay Guide

The School of Political Science and International Studies Essay Guide can be downloaded from the School’s Student Support webpage.

The Guide sets out guidelines you should follow in preparing written assignments. 

Essay Writing Assistance

The School of Political Science and International Studies schedules regular “drop-in” sessions designed to provide one-on-one advice and assistance in essay planning and writing.

There is no need to make an appointment and you are encouraged to bring your essay with you.

The day and time of these sessions will be finalized at the beginning of each semester and published on the Student Support webpage.

Student Services

Student services offer a variety of short courses during the semester which will help you improve your study, research and writing skills and thus your academic performance in this course.

Library Resources

UQ Library offers training in software, assignment writing, research skills, and publishing and research management.

The University’s library holdings for Political Science and International Studies are primarily located in the Central Library.

There is a help desk in the Library. Students are also welcome to contact the BEL/HASS Librarians for assistance.

Email: librarians@library.uq.edu.au

Book a Librarian Appointment (BEL/HASS faculties)

Learning activities

The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.

Filter activity type by

Please select
Clear filters
Learning period Activity type Topic
Week 1

(28 Jul - 03 Aug)

Lecture

Week 1: Welcome, Introductions and Methodological Foundations

Our first meeting will be dedicated to introducing and outlining the course, its modalities and its objectives. We will talk about the organisation of the learning experience, and about how we will approach the complex but very interesting topic of political dynamics of development and resistance. We explore the evolution of development theory and the importance of resistance in shaping political outcomes. Theories include modernisation theory, dependency theory, and intersectionality. To prepare for the opening meeting, please refer to the Library Reading List for POLS2404.

Learning outcomes: L01, L03

Week 2

(04 Aug - 10 Aug)

Lecture

Week 2: Feminist Political Economy Perspectives on Development

This week introduces feminist political economy as a critical lens for understanding development, focusing on how global economic systems shape and often marginalize gendered labour, care work, and social reproduction. We examine how intersecting structures of power—such as patriarchy, capitalism, and colonialism—impact women and other marginalized groups in both formal and informal economies.

Key theoretical frameworks include social reproduction theory and feminist economics, which help us analyse the undervaluation of care work and the systemic invisibility of gendered labour in mainstream development discourse. Case studies such as global care chains and UN gender data initiatives will be used to ground these theories in real-world contexts.

This module contributes to the course’s broader aim of rethinking development by foregrounding the relational and embodied dimensions of labour, and by highlighting how feminist perspectives offer transformative alternatives to dominant economic models.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L04

Tutorial

Tutorial 1

Feminist Political Economy in Practice

This week’s tutorial introduces key concepts in feminist political economy through interactive activities. Students will take part in a group discussion on global care chains, exploring how gendered labour is shaped by transnational inequalities. The session also includes a hands-on introduction to UN gender data, where students will begin learning how to interpret and apply quantitative insights to development issues. Finally, students will form their groups for the upcoming case study assessment to begin planning their topics and approach.


Learning outcomes: L01, L04

Week 3

(11 Aug - 17 Aug)

No student involvement (Breaks, information)

Week 3: Open Reading Week

This week we continue with the task of exploring conceptual aspects of understanding the politics of development and resistance, and we focus in particular on its political economy underpinnings. Karl Polanyi s work provides a rich and instructive framework for working through some of the contradictions and conflicts induced by market-centred development. We encounter his concept of a double-movement and consider its relevance for understanding and analysing resistance to the politics of the market. Some concrete examples will supplement our discussion throughout.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03

No student involvement (Breaks, information)

Open Reading Week

Learning outcomes: L02, L03

Week 4

(18 Aug - 24 Aug)

Lecture

Week 4: Ontological Politics & Plural Worldviews

This week introduces the concept of ontological politics, focusing on how different communities construct, experience, and defend diverse ways of being and knowing. We explore how Indigenous cosmologies challenge dominant development paradigms by revealing that development is not a singular or universal trajectory, but a contested and plural process shaped by multiple realities.

Through theories of political ontology and decolonial thought, students will examine how knowledge systems are embedded in power relations and how struggles over land, life, and meaning are also struggles over what counts as reality. Case studies—such as the Zapatista movement—will illustrate how Indigenous worldviews offer alternative visions of autonomy, care, and collective life beyond the logic of extractivism and linear progress.

This module deepens the course’s commitment to rethinking development by foregrounding the politics of knowledge and the legitimacy of diverse world-making practices.

Learning outcomes: L02, L03, L04

Tutorial

Tutorial 2

Mapping Indigenous Territories and Development Conflicts

This tutorial begins with a recap of key concepts from the lecture, focusing on ontological politics and Indigenous cosmologies. Students will then engage in a spatial mapping activity to explore how Indigenous territories intersect with development conflicts, highlighting contested claims to land, resources, and sovereignty. This exercise encourages critical reflection on how space and knowledge are politicised in development contexts. The session will conclude with the formation of case study assessment groups and initial topic selection, helping students begin planning their collaborative research projects.

Learning outcomes: L02, L03, L04

Week 5

(25 Aug - 31 Aug)

Lecture

Week 5: Post-Development Alternatives

This week introduces post-development theory as a critique of mainstream development paradigms, challenging Western-centric notions of progress, growth, and modernity. We trace contemporary global inequalities and political domination to their colonial roots, examining how development has historically been co-constituted with systems of power, representation, and knowledge production.

Students will engage with alternative frameworks such as Buen Vivir and Ubuntu, which offer relational, community-based, and ecologically grounded visions of well-being. These perspectives reject the universalising logic of development and instead propose plural, culturally embedded pathways toward justice and sustainability.

This module supports the course’s broader aim of rethinking development by foregrounding epistemic diversity and the need to decolonise both theory and practice.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03

Tutorial

Tutorial 3

Rethinking Well-Being and Quiz 1

In this tutorial, we critically examine how well-being is measured beyond conventional economic indicators like GDP. Through a comparative analysis of alternative well-being frameworks—including those rooted in relational, ecological, and cultural values—students will reflect on how development can be understood through more inclusive and justice-oriented lenses. The session also includes Quiz 1, an in-class activity designed to assess your understanding of key concepts introduced in the first three weeks, including post-development theory, colonial legacies, and plural pathways to well-being.

Learning outcomes: L02, L04

Week 6

(01 Sep - 07 Sep)

Lecture

Week 6: Climate Justice & Environmental Resistance

This week examines the intersection of environmental degradation and social justice, highlighting how ecological crises are deeply entangled with histories of colonialism, global inequality, and resistance. Students will critically engage with concepts such as climate colonialismextractivism, and the environmentalism of the poor, using these to interrogate dominant narratives of sustainability and development.

Drawing on theories of environmental justice and slow violence, the module explores how environmental harms are unevenly distributed and resisted, particularly by Indigenous and marginalized communities. Case studies—including the Standing Rock Sioux resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline and Amazonian struggles against deforestation—will ground theoretical insights in lived experiences of resistance.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04

Tutorial

Tutorial 4

Climate Justice and Group Assessment Check-in Session

This week’s tutorial focuses on applied policy writing through a climate justice statement drafting exercise, where students will articulate key principles and demands grounded in the course’s critical frameworks. The activity encourages students to reflect on the intersection of environmental degradation, inequality, and resistance.

The session also includes the first of two check-in sessions on group case study projects, providing space to assess group dynamics, clarify roles, and refine research plans as students prepare for their collaborative assessment

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04

Week 7

(08 Sep - 14 Sep)

Lecture

Week 7: Labour Struggles & Just Transitions

This week explores the politics of labour within development, focusing on how workers and labouring communities navigate and resist systems of exclusion and precarity. Building on earlier discussions of political economy and historical legacies of inequality, we examine how labour struggles have evolved in response to shifting global dynamics, including informalisation, austerity, and climate change.

We critically engage with contemporary debates around labour rights, informal economies, and the potential of universal basic income and social protection as tools for justice. The concept of a just transition—ensuring that climate action does not deepen inequality—is central to our inquiry. Through case studies such as Ecuador’s post-extractivist movements and global green job transitions, students will apply theories of labour resistance and political economy to real-world struggles.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04

Tutorial

Tutorial 5

Labour Data and Video Assessment Planning

This tutorial begins with a recap of key concepts from the lecture, focusing on labour struggles and just transitions. Students will engage in a hands-on data analysis activity using labour statistics and transition policy examples to explore patterns of inequality, precarity, and reform.

The session also includes dedicated time for planning the individual video assessment, with a focus on the visual and multimedia components. Students will discuss strategies for presenting their research creatively and effectively, and clarify expectations for both the video and live Q&A components.

Learning outcomes: L02, L04

Week 8

(15 Sep - 21 Sep)

Lecture

Week 8: Urban Inequality and the Politics of Space

In this week we explore how urban spaces are shaped by and contested through power, inequality, and resistance. We explore the politics of space through the lens of spatial justice and the right to the city, examining how urban development often reproduces exclusion along lines of class, race, and colonial legacies.

Students will engage with critical urban theory and grassroots responses to urban inequality, focusing on housing struggles, displacement, and the reclaiming of public space. Case studies from Latin America and Europe will illustrate how urban social movements challenge dominant models of development and articulate alternative urban futures grounded in justice, dignity, and collective rights.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04

Tutorial

Tutorial 6

Mapping Urban Resistance and Group Case Study Check-In

This tutorial begins with a GIS mapping exercise to explore urban resistance movements and spatial justice. Students will analyse how contested urban spaces reflect broader struggles over development, displacement, and the right to the city. The activity encourages critical engagement with spatial data and visual storytelling.

The session also includes our second group check-in for the case study assessment, providing time to reflect on group dynamics, refine research plans, and ensure progress toward a cohesive and collaborative final submission.

Learning outcomes: L02, L03, L04

Week 9

(22 Sep - 28 Sep)

Lecture

Week 9: Water, Power, and Indigenous Resistance

This week explores water as a deeply political, cultural, and spiritual resource, central to both development struggles and Indigenous sovereignty. We examine how access to and governance of water is shaped by colonial histories, extractive economies, and contested claims to land and life.

Students will engage with Indigenous perspectives on water governance and resistance, focusing on how water is defended not only as a resource but as a relative, a right, and a site of cultural survival. Case studies such as the Dakota Access Pipeline protests and Māori struggles for water rights will ground our analysis in real-world movements that challenge dominant development paradigms.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04

Tutorial

Tutorial 7

Mapping Water Conflicts and Quiz 2

This tutorial focuses on the politics of water through a conflict mapping exercise, where students will analyse disputes over water access, governance, and extraction. Using real-world examples, the activity deepens understanding of water sovereignty, Indigenous resistance, and the contested nature of environmental resources in development contexts.

The session also includes Quiz 2, an in-class assessment designed to evaluate your grasp of key concepts from recent modules, including environmental justice, extractivism, and Indigenous governance.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04

Mid Sem break

(29 Sep - 05 Oct)

No student involvement (Breaks, information)

MID-SEMESTER BREAK

(Mid-Semester Break)

Week 10

(06 Oct - 12 Oct)

Lecture

Week 10: Food Sovereignty and Agrarian Resistance

This week focuses on food justice and the global struggle for food sovereignty as a powerful alternative to industrial agriculture and corporate-controlled food systems. We examine the Food Sovereignty Movement (FSM) as a transnational network advancing ecologically sustainable, socially just, and culturally grounded approaches to food production, distribution, and consumption.

Students will critically compare industrial agribusiness models with agroecological alternatives, exploring how peasant movements—such as La Vía Campesina—mobilize against land dispossession, environmental degradation, and the commodification of food. We will analyse the political and economic forces shaping global food systems and the grassroots strategies used to reclaim autonomy over land, seeds, and livelihoods.

This module contributes to the course’s broader aim of rethinking development by highlighting how food sovereignty movements challenge dominant paradigms and offer transformative visions rooted in solidarity, sustainability, and resistance.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04

Tutorial

Tutorial 8

Advocacy Writing and Final Assessment Prep

In our final tutorial, we focus on advocacy writing by drafting a concise and persuasive policy brief on food sovereignty. This exercise draws on course themes of resistance, justice, and alternative development models, helping students translate critical analysis into actionable policy language.

We will also conduct a final check-in on the video assessment, with particular attention to preparing for the live Q&A component. Students will have the opportunity to share progress, clarify expectations, and receive peer feedback to strengthen their final presentations.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L04

Week 11

(13 Oct - 19 Oct)

Lecture

Week 11: Digital Resistance and the Politics of Technology

This week explores the dual role of digital technologies as tools of both resistance and control within contested development landscapes. We critically examine how digital platforms shape political participation, surveillance, and social movements, drawing on theories of networked protest, digital rights, and platform capitalism.

We investigate how digital activism emerges in response to authoritarianism, inequality, and dispossession, while also considering how technologies can reinforce existing power structures. Case studies such as the Arab Spring and Indigenous digital sovereignty movements will ground our analysis in real-world struggles over visibility, voice, and autonomy in the digital sphere.

This approach helps us rethink development by interrogating how digital technologies mediate power, resistance, and justice in contemporary global contexts.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04

Week 12

(20 Oct - 26 Oct)

Lecture

Week 12: Transnational Resistance and Solidarity Economies

This week explores how transnational movements and solidarity economies challenge neoliberal development models and cultivate alternative political imaginaries. We examine how global networks of resistance—rooted in diverse local struggles—forge connections across borders to contest inequality, corporate power, and extractive governance.

We engage with the political practices and visions of movements such as the World Social Forum and Zapatista internationalism, analysing how they construct spaces of autonomy, mutual aid, and collective action. Emphasis is placed on how these movements reimagine development through principles of solidarity, self-determination, and grassroots democracy.

This module contributes to the course’s broader aim of rethinking development by highlighting the power of transnational resistance to inspire transformative alternatives grounded in justice, care, and cooperation.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L04

Week 13

(27 Oct - 02 Nov)

Applied Class

Week 13: Video Presentation

Final Presentations – Development Challenges and Resistance

In this final online lecture, students will present their individual video assessments in a collaborative and supportive setting. Using Microsoft Teams, students will be randomly assigned to breakout rooms of 4–5 peers, where each person will share their 5-minute pre-recorded video, followed by a 5-minute live Q&A led by their peers.

This session is designed to showcase your research on development challenges and resistance movements, while also practicing critical communication and engagement skills. The Q&A component encourages thoughtful dialogue and reflection, reinforcing the course’s emphasis on relational learning, applied analysis, and diverse perspectives on development.

The Q&A session will be recorded to assist in marking each student's engagement in their content area discussion.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03, L04

Policies and procedures

University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:

Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.