Skip to menu Skip to content Skip to footer
Course profile

Political Attitudes & Political Behaviour (POLS3118)

Study period
Sem 1 2025
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person

Course overview

Study period
Semester 1, 2025 (24/02/2025 - 21/06/2025)
Study level
Undergraduate
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person
Units
2
Administrative campus
St Lucia
Coordinating unit
Politic Sc & Internat Studies

Why do some disenfranchised groups engage in collective action, while others accept their inferior position? How could an authoritarian leader like Hitler acquire such a massive following? Why do some leaders become regarded as charismatic, while others are dismissed as uninspiring? Why are some people attracted to the political left, while others are drawn to the right? What can policy-makers do to secure lasting attitude- and behaviour change? These, and many other questions, are the province of political psychology, a field that uses qualitative and quantitative methods and psychological theories as tools to help understand political processes. In this advanced-level course, students are familiarized with the most prominent debates in political psychology, as well as with more contemporary perspectives that problematize the many assumptions about human behaviour and motivation underlying these classic perspectives.

There are no specific prerequisites for this course, butᅠinterest in psychological explanations of social and political behaviour will certainly be helpful.

AlthoughᅠPOLS3118 can be taken as a 'stand-alone' course, it can be regarded as an idealᅠ'companion'ᅠto courses examining ways in which humans deal with intergroup tensions/conflict, and ways in which governments and NGOs can foster trust and cooperation:

For example, the course will be of relevance to the following courses:

  • POLS1201 - Introduction to International Relations
  • POLS2217 - European Political Issues
  • POLS2211 - International Organisations and Political Cooperation
  • POLS2509 - Ethnic Conflict and Nationalism

Course requirements

Incompatible

You can't enrol in this course if you've already completed the following:

POLS2118

Course contact

Course staff

Lecturer

Timetable

The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.

Additional timetable information

This course comprises 12 lectures starting in Week 1, and 8 tutorials starting in Week 2.

Aims and outcomes

The course has three main aims, which are: (a) to familiarize students with the main (classic and contemporary) debates in Political Psychology, (b) to help students acquire a sound understanding of the psychological theories typically deployed in this field to analyse particular political phenomena, and (c) to develop the ability to question underlying assumptions with the help of more contemporary alternative political science and psychological perspectives.

Apart from providing students the opportunity to develop their independent, critical thinking skills, the course will also provide ample opportunity (in the form of written assignments and oral tutorial participation) for students to develop their communication skills.

A graduate of Political Science understands the complexity of democratic systems in terms of the ideas, institutions, and policies that define them. They are capable of synthesizing diverse types of evidence and assessing it independently of their own beliefs and interests, communicating their judgements persuasively in written and oral forms. These skills are essential to policy and political leadership that addresses the challenges facing the world’s democracies.  

Learning outcomes

After successfully completing this course you should be able to:

LO1.

Display in-depth knowledge of the big debates in political psychology, of advances in political psychology, and of the ways in which contemporary political psychology insights can enrich mainstream political science theorizing

LO2.

Display the ability (in written and oral communication) to evaluate policy responses from a political psychology perspective (in written and oral form), and to identify alternative responses based on different conceptions of human motivation and behaviour

Assessment

Assessment summary

Category Assessment task Weight Due date
Paper/ Report/ Annotation, Participation/ Student contribution Tutorial preparation and participation
  • In-person
30%

6/03/2025 - 15/05/2025

Presentation Recorded Job Pitch (5 Minute Video) 20%

11/04/2025 4:00 pm

Performance Oral Assessment (10 Minutes, In Person)
  • In-person
50%

19/05/2025 - 30/05/2025

Assessment details

Tutorial preparation and participation

  • In-person
Mode
Activity/ Performance
Category
Paper/ Report/ Annotation, Participation/ Student contribution
Weight
30%
Due date

6/03/2025 - 15/05/2025

Task description

Eight tutorials are scheduled, starting in Week 2. They are an essential component of the course, which is why in person attendance is mandatory. The tutorials provide an environment in which you will have the opportunity to engage with the core themes of the course and to discuss the various perspectives on these issues.

Students are expected to submit a short (400 word) summary of one of the readings listed for that week in the course reading list. The downloadable reading list can be found on the course's Blackboard site. Students are expected to bring in their summary in hardcopy format to the tutorial (so it can be used to guide group discussion, and so it can be handed it in at the end of the tutorial) and to upload the weekly summaries via Turnitin.

Note 1: The article summaries you are expected to hand in should be split in two parts, and provide:

(a) An accurate overview of the chosen article's central research question, main argument(s), the evidence being invoked to back up claims (ca. 200 words)

(b) A reflection on the relevance of the chosen article for real-life policy making (ca. 200 words)

Note 2: Your tutorial mark will be calculated (out of a total of #30 maximum) based on:

  1. The quality of your written tutorial submissions (8 x 2# = 16# maximum)
  2. The frequency and quality of your contribution in group discussion (14# maximum)

PS - A more detailed marking criteria matrix for this assignment will be made available via the course blackboard site.

Assessment tasks are intended to evaluate a student’s abilities, skills, and knowledge. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment instructions, assessments are to be completed without the aid of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Translation (MT). Failure to comply with this direction may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. 

Submission guidelines

Students are expected to submit a short (400 word) summary of one of the readings listed for that week in the course reading list. The downloadable reading list can be found on the course's Blackboard site. Students are expected to bring in their summary in hardcopy format to the tutorial (so it can be used to guide group discussion, and so it can be handed it in at the end of the tutorial).

Assignments for this course will be submitted electronically via Blackboard and using Turnitin. (Alongside hardcopy handing in as per above)

In uploading an assignment via Turnitin you are certifying that it is your original work, that it has not been copied in whole or part from another person or source except where this is properly acknowledged, and that it has not in whole or part been previously submitted for assessment in any other course at this or any other university.

When you successfully submit your assessment to Turnitin after previewing the uploaded document (to make sure that you have chosen the correct file), you should see the “Submission Complete!” message. After this, a downloadable Digital Receipt will display on your Assignment Dashboard. It is your responsibility to download the Digital Receipt as proof of submission. Turnitin will not send this receipt to you automatically.

If you don’t see the downloadable receipt on your assignment dashboard, you should regard your submission as unsuccessful.

If the submission was not successful:

  1. Note the error message (preferably take a screenshot).
  2. Go to your assignment page and see if it is possible to submit again.
  3. If you cannot submit again, then email your course coordinator immediately.


Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

Students unable to attend one of more tutorials due to circumstances beyond their control (e.g., illness, jury duty, care duties) may be granted the opportunity to compensate for their absence by submitting a longer 700-word article summary, provided (a) the course coordinator and tutor are being notified by email before the tutorial takes place, and (b) supporting evidence is being provided before the end of the week in which the tutorial tool place (e.g., a medical certificate, hospital admission statement, letter informing of upcoming jury duty).

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Unless an extension is granted, penalties for late submission apply. Students are penalised 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item for every calendar day that an assessment item is late.

Marks will be deducted each day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point the submitted item will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is triggered from the time the submission is due.

Recorded Job Pitch (5 Minute Video)

Mode
Product/ Artefact/ Multimedia
Category
Presentation
Weight
20%
Due date

11/04/2025 4:00 pm

Task description

Students are expected:

(a) To find a (current or recent) advertisement for a role they are (actually or potentially) interested in

(b) To record a 'job pitch' in which the student explains the skills they can bring to the role as a UQ graduate

(c) To record, save, and upload this recording using EchoVideo so it can be marked.

For more information on how to use EchoVideo, see:

The recorded job-pitch will be marked using the following criteria:

  1. Quality of Delivery (Clarity, Confidence, Authenticity)
  2. Ability to articulate acquired skills and match them with the institution's skill expectations
  3. Ability to articulate long-term career aspirations and identify possible skill gaps that may require ongoing professional development training

PS - A more detailed marking criteria matrix for this assignment will be made available via the course blackboard site.

Artificial Intelligence Warning: Assessment tasks are intended to evaluate a student’s abilities, skills, and knowledge. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment instructions, assessments are to be completed without the aid of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Translation (MT). Failure to comply with this direction may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. Plagiarism Warning: Please ensure your assignment meets the UQ Academic Integrity standards (see below, in the POLSIS Essay Guide and/or UQ's website on Academic Integrity). Assignments containing one or more sections paraphrased or copied verbatim from other sources without adequate referencing will be reported to the POLSIS Integrity Officer, who will subsequently subject the assignment to closer inspection and reach a decision as to whether penalties for academic misconduct should be applied.

Submission guidelines

Record, save, and upload this recording using EchoVideo.

For more information on how to use EchoVideo, see:


Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Unless an extension is granted, penalties for late submission apply. Students are penalised 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item for every calendar day that an assessment item is late.

Marks will be deducted each day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point the submitted item will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is triggered from the time the submission is due.

Oral Assessment (10 Minutes, In Person)

  • In-person
Mode
Oral
Category
Performance
Weight
50%
Due date

19/05/2025 - 30/05/2025

Task description

Students are expected to sit an in-person oral assessment.

The oral assessment will be conducted by the course coordinator and course tutor, and provisionally awarded marks by each marker will be moderated shortly after the assessment.

The oral assessment will probe:

(a) The student's ability to apply relevant POLS3118 insights to historical events and/or current (domestic and international) policy challenges, and

(b) The student's understanding of the way(s) in which POLS3118 insights enhance student employability.

PS - A more detailed marking criteria matrix for this assignment will be made available via the course blackboard site.

Plagiarism Warning: Please ensure your assignment meets the UQ Academic Integrity standards (see in the POLSIS Essay Guide available at the POLSIS Student Support page and/or UQ's policy on Academic Integrity). Assignments containing one or more sections paraphrased or copied verbatim from other sources without adequate referencing will be reported to the POLSIS Integrity Officer, who will subsequently subject the assignment to closer inspection and reach a decision as to whether penalties for academic misconduct should be applied.

Artificial Intelligence Warning: This assessment task is to be completed in-person. The use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Translation (MT) tools will not be permitted. Any attempted use of AI or MT may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct.

Submission guidelines

Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

Course grading

Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.

Grade Description
1 (Low Fail)

Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Fails to demonstrate most or all of the basic requirements of the course: None of the above criteria will have been met. This student will not have addressed the question, shown no or very little evidence of reading and minimal comprehension of the issues at hand.

2 (Fail)

Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Demonstrates clear deficiencies in understanding and applying fundamental concepts; communicates information or ideas in ways that are frequently incomplete or confusing and give little attention to the conventions of the discipline: None of the above criteria will have been met. This student will not have addressed the question, shown no or very little evidence of reading and minimal comprehension of the issues at hand.

3 (Marginal Fail)

Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes

Course grade description: Demonstrates superficial or partial or faulty understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study and limited ability to apply these concepts; presents undeveloped or inappropriate or unsupported arguments; communicates information or ideas with lack of clarity and inconsistent adherence to the conventions of the discipline: Falls short of satisfying all basic requirements for a Pass. The student will have demonstrated a minimal grasp of the chosen topic and will have made an effort to establish a single major argument for the essay. The student will have employed some research which correlated with the argument and will have made a visible effort to achieve adequate grammar, spelling and punctuation. Evidence of attempting to achieve a recognisable narrative flow should appear throughout the assignment. This student will have addressed the question, showing evidence of required research and a basic grasp of the issues at hand.

4 (Pass)

Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Demonstrates adequate understanding and application of the fundamental concepts of the field of study; develops routine arguments or decisions and provides acceptable justification; communicates information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline: The student will have demonstrated an adequate grasp of the chosen topic and will have made a reasonable effort to provide evidence to support a visible argument. The student will have employed an adequate research base to support the argument and will have achieved a reasonable, if not completely coherent standard of grammar, spelling, and punctuation. A recognisable narrative flow should be sustained throughout the essay. This student will have answered the question, showing evidence of adequate research and a degree of understanding of the issues at hand.

5 (Credit)

Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline: The student will have demonstrated a sound grasp of the chosen topic and will have addressed the argument by providing suitable evidence to support an argument. The student will have employed a comprehensive research base that directly relates to the topic though it may not completely support the argument and will have achieved decent levels of competence in grammar, spelling, punctuation and narrative flow. This student will have answered the question in a direct, well supported fashion, showing evidence of some wide reading and a reasonable understanding of the issues at hand.

6 (Distinction)

Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: As for 5, with frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience: The student will have demonstrated a very good grasp of the chosen topic and will have addressed the argument by providing a considerable amount of evidence to support a clearly stated argument. The student will have employed a reasonably extensive and well-organised research base to structure evidence in support of the argument and will have achieved a high level of competence in grammar, spelling, punctuation and narrative flow. This student will have answered the question in a direct, reasonably sophisticated fashion, employing wide research and showing a sound understanding of the issues at hand.

7 (High Distinction)

Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: As for 6, with consistent evidence of substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critically evaluates problems, their solutions and implications: The student will have demonstrated a highly sophisticated grasp of the topic and will have succeeded in addressing the question by providing a high level of evidence to support a clearly stated argument.ᅠThe student will have employed an extensive and well organised research base to structure evidence in support of the argument and will have achieved impeccable levels of grammar, spelling, punctuation and narrative flow.ᅠThis student will have answered the question in a direct and elegant fashion, employing significant research and showing a deep understanding of the issues at hand.

Additional course grading information

Grades will be awarded on the following basis:

1. Fail ᅠ ᅠᅠ (1 - 19%)

2. Failᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ (20 - 39%)

3. Fail ᅠ ᅠᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ (40 – 49%)

4. Passᅠᅠᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ (50 - 64%)

5. Creditᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ (65 - 74%)

6. Distinctionᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ (75 - 84%)

7. High Distinctionᅠᅠ (85 - 100%)

Supplementary assessment

Supplementary assessment is available for this course.

Additional assessment information

Word Length Penalty (Not Applicable)

Unless otherwise indicated, in the case of written submissions with a specified word count, you are given a +10% leeway on the upper word limit. If your written submission is over this leeway limit, it will attract a 10 percentage point penalty. For example, if your essay is 1,500 words, you may write up to 1,650 before attracting a word count penalty. If your essay exceeds the upper word limit, it will attract a 10% word count penalty. Therefore, if your essay is worth 40 marks, you will lose 4 marks from your allotted grade. Unless specified, penalties only apply to exceeding the word length, not for failure to write a sufficient amount.

Students should note:

• The Author-date in-text referencing system will count toward the word length;

• References in the Footnote referencing system will not count toward the word length. If you are using footnotes, any content included in footnotes beyond the specific text reference will count towards the word length.

Learning resources

You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.

Library resources

Find the required and recommended resources for this course on the UQ Library website.

Additional learning resources information

Essay Guide

The School of Political Science and International Studies Essay Guide can be downloaded from the School’s Student Support webpage.

The Guide sets out guidelines you should follow in preparing written assignments. 

Essay Writing Assistance

The School of Political Science and International Studies schedules regular “drop-in” sessions designed to provide one-on-one advice and assistance in essay planning and writing.

There is no need to make an appointment and you are encouraged to bring your essay with you.

The day and time of these sessions will be finalized at the beginning of each semester and published on the Student Support webpage.

Student Services

Student services offer a variety of short courses during the semester which will help you improve your study, research and writing skills and thus your academic performance in this course.

Library Resources

UQ Library offers training in software, assignment writing, research skills, and publishing and research management.

The University’s library holdings for Political Science and International Studies are primarily located in the Central Library.

There is a help desk in the Library. Students are also welcome to contact the BEL/HASS Librarians for assistance.

Email: librarians@library.uq.edu.au

Book a Librarian Appointment (BEL/HASS faculties)

Learning activities

The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.

Filter activity type by

Please select
Clear filters
Learning period Activity type Topic
Week 1

(24 Feb - 02 Mar)

Lecture

Thu 27/2 - Lecture 1 (Introduction)

Citizens engage in all kinds of political behaviours (e.g., voting, joining a party, campaign volunteering, joining a trade union, taking part in protest marches, joining a terrorist group). But what motivates citizens to engage in these behaviours? Does it all boil down to rational material self-interests? Or are people driven by norms, ideas, and social identities? In this introductory lecture we will consider possible motivations, and the way in which these behaviours are typically interpreted in the media.

Not Timetabled

No tutorial in week 1

Week 2

(03 Mar - 09 Mar)

Lecture

Thu 6/3 - Lecture 2 (Beyond Rational Self-Interest)

For a long time, political behaviour was seen as motivated by individual self-interest, with humans being conceived as rational selfish utility maximizers (homo economicus). In this lecture we will examine the gradual demise of this economic approach to political behaviour, brought about by (a) growing awareness (thanks to cognition psychology) that humans have ムbounded rationalityメ, and (b) growing awareness (thanks to social psychology) that human behaviour is context-dependent and influenced by identities and social norms.

Tutorial

Tutorial 1

Tutorial Questions

* Are we humans rational?
* How rational is our political behaviour?
* Is our political behaviour guided by material self-interests?
* Why are 'homo economicus' explanations popular?

Week 3

(10 Mar - 16 Mar)

Lecture

Thu 13/3 - Lecture 3 (Election Studies / Psephology)

As can be seen from Donald Trump's 2016 surprise election victory, and Vote Leave's unexpected victory in the UK's 2016 Brexit referendum, election- and referenda results are difficult to predict, this despite the use of sophisticated statistical methods in election studies (psephology). In this lecture we will first consider the shortcomings of opinion poll research examining ムindividual-level factorsメ, and subsequently consider relevant studies showing voters' voting decisions are heavily influenced by collective-level factors, such as (positive and negative) ムpartisanshipメ and ムaffective polarizationメ.

Tutorial

Tutorial 2

Tutorial Questions

* Why do election forecasters often get it wrong?
* Which assumptions do opinion pollsters make?
* Which factors are overlooked in pre-election opinion polls?
* Is there risk of 'confirmation bias' in opinion poll research?

Week 4

(17 Mar - 23 Mar)

Lecture

Thu 20/3 - Lecture 4 (Leadership and Followership)

Journalists are often quick to interpret the growing popularity of a politician or party as evidence of this politician party having read the public mood accurately and having a message that resonates with public sentiment ムout there in societyメ. In so doing, what is often underestimated is the extent to which politicians and parties are able to shape public sentiment (by fomenting grievances). In this lecture we will review three leadership approaches (leader-centric, follower-centric, leader-follower group processes). The lecture will conclude with a brief reflection on how leadership research focusing on group processes might enrich political science research into 'elite cueing', 'voter attitudes', ムpartisanshipメ, and ムaffective polarizationメ.

Not Timetabled

No tutorial in week 4

Week 5

(24 Mar - 30 Mar)

Lecture

Thu 27/3 - Lecture 5 (Ideology and Collective Action)

In this lecture we will examine how ideologies shape political behaviour. Broadly speaking, we can distinguish between ideologies that promote social change and challenge the status quo (e.g., Marxism, Feminism), and ideologies that oppose social change and protect the status quo (e.g., Capitalism, Religion, Nationalism). But why are people drawn to different ideologies? And why do people subscribe to ideologies that harm their self-interest? In this lecture we review research into individual-level factors (personality traits, cognitive ability), group-level factors (socialization, social identity) and leader-follower interaction (leaders invoking ideology in their messaging).

Tutorial

Tutorial 3

Tutorial Questions

* Are charismatic leaders 'born special'?
* Do charismatic leaders possess particular personality traits?
* Are some people more attracted to authoritarian leaders?
* What can we learn from leaders who 'fell from grace'?
* Do we follow leaders, or do leaders follow us?

Week 6

(31 Mar - 06 Apr)

Lecture

Thu 3/4 - Lecture 6 (Understanding Political Behaviour)

In this lecture we review the different lenses through which political scientists typically examine political behaviour, namely (a) rational self-interest, (b) cognition effects, (c) social identity, (d) emotions, (e) values, (f) culture, and (g) personality traits. Political scientists will typically acknowledge that each of these approaches has merit, and that a combination of approaches may be needed to explain political behaviour adequately. However, in practice research is often narrowly focused on one of these explanations, and over-reliant on one forms of evidence-gathering (e.g., opinion polls to gauge individual differences in political attitudes). The lecture will conclude with a brief review of research raising these challenges and suggesting ways in which perspectives can be combined.

Tutorial

Tutorial 4

Tutorial Questions

* Do people support ideologies that serve their self-interest?
* Do voters vote for parties that protect their self-interest?
* Why do voters vote for parties that harm their self-interest?
* How can we explain self-harming voting behaviour?

Week 7

(07 Apr - 13 Apr)

Lecture

Thu 10/4 - Lecture 7 (Social Movements and Contentious Politics)

How can we explain the emergence of new social movements? Why do some social movements resort disruptive ムcontentious politicsメ techniques such as strikes, protest rallies, or riots? In this lecture we will consider two perspectives. One school of thought, popular in conservative circles, takes its cues from the French criminologist Gustave LeBon, and views popular uprisings as evidence of rising normlessness (ムbreakdownメ). A second school of thought, popular in progressive circles, draws on Karl Marxメ work, and views uprisings as a sign of deprivation and rising class consciousness (ムsolidarityメ). Researchers seem to have lost interest in this old ムbreakdown vs. solidarityメ debate. However, as we will see, the underlying ideas remain relevant, and inform the way in which left-wing and right-wing governments are inclined to interpret (and respond to) instances of civil unrest (e.g., the 2011 London Riots).

Not Timetabled

No tutorial in week 7

Week 8

(14 Apr - 20 Apr)

Lecture

Thu 17/4 - Lecture 8 (Explaining Genocide)

How can we explain the Holocaust and other genocides? Are genocides committed by extremely evil individuals with deviant personality traits? Or are they committed by 'ordinary people in extraordinary conditions and passively following orders', as Hannah Arendt and Stanley Milgram famously argued? Or could it be a combination of personality traits and situation, and a matter of people with authoritarian personality traits more likely to be drawn to situations in which power abuses occur, as interactionists argued? In this lecture we will take a closer look at these three classic perspectives (personality traits, situation, interaction) and introduce a more contemporary fourth perspective, according to which genocide perpetrators are best viewed, not as individuals blindly following orders, but as members of groups enthusiastically enacting shared identity and shared convictions.

Tutorial

Tutorial 5

Tutorial Questions

* Are some people more prone to turn to violence?
* Does conflict 'boil down' to conflict over scarce resources?
* What lessons did Sherif draw from his boys camp study?
* What alternative explanations exist to explain conflict?
* What do Social Identity Theorists say about conflict?

Mid-sem break

(21 Apr - 27 Apr)

No student involvement (Breaks, information)

21/4 - 25/4 (MID SEMESTER BREAK)

Mid-Semester Break

Week 9

(28 Apr - 04 May)

Lecture

Thu 1/5 - Lecture 9 (Populism and the Wealth Paradox)

Populist radical right parties have made a remarkable comeback in recent decades. This revival began in the 1980s, long before ムBrexit and Trumpメ, and has been attributed to radical right parties managing to shake off their thuggish image. But when do populist parties thrive? Who votes radical right? And why? In this lecture we will use the findings of recent Wealth Paradox and V-Curve research to debunk two pervasive myths about populist radical right voting, namely the idea (a) that economic crises provide ムfertile soilメ for populist parties, and (b) that populist parties attract disproportionate numbers of blue-collar workers on low-incomes (so-called ムlosers of globalization in rustbelt states). The main take-home message of this lecture is that, as populism scholars have known for quite some time, economic crises, surging immigration, and low-income are in fact poor predictors of populist voting.

Tutorial

Tutorial 6

Tutorial Questions

* What is populism? What is nativism?
* What do populist parties have in common?
* Are some voters more likely to vote radical right?
* What does the term 'The Wealth Paradox' refer to?

Week 10

(05 May - 11 May)

Lecture

Thu 8/5 - Lecture 10 (Propaganda, Fake News, Conspiracy beliefs)

There was widespread outcry when whistle-blowers revealed that Cambridge Analytica had micro-targeted Facebook users in the lead up to elections. Attempts to influence voters covertly, so critics rightfully argued, were unethical and undemocratic. But is covert microtargeting as effective as so many have claimed? And was it ムunprecedentedメ, as is often claimed? In this lecture we will question these claims and review previous attempts to manipulate public opinion covertly (e.g., the Soviet Union used ムactive measuresメ to undermine West European governments). We will also consider whether Frankfurt School research into propaganda, which viewed propaganda as powerful elites controlling working class minds, can help us understand recent events (e.g., Cambridge Analytica). Finally, we will explore the psychology of conspiracy beliefs, and consider whether some people are prone to believe in conspiracies, and why it is so hard to climb out of a conspiracy ムrabbit holeメ.

Tutorial

Tutorial 7

* What would historians have to say about 'fake news'?

* Which actors use fake news and misinformation?

* How did Frankfurt School scholars view mass manipulation?

* What is the book 'Manufacturing Consent' about?

Week 11

(12 May - 18 May)

Lecture

Thu 15/5 - Lecture 11 (Public Policy and Behaviour Change)

Governments can use different techniques (or 'modes of governance') to influence the behaviour of citizens, communities, and organizations. Broadly speaking, the public policy literature suggests governments can use five modes of governance, namely ムhierarchyメ, ムmarketsメ, ムnetworksメ, ムstealthメ, and ムpersuasionメ. In practice governments often use a combination of these modes (e.g., persuasion backed up by hierarchy). In this lecture we will consider the pros and cons of each of these modes, thereby paying particular attention to the capacity of each mode of governance to bring about enduring behaviour change. As we will see, governments across the globe have used different modes of governance to contain the Covid-19 pandemic, with varying degrees of success, and the choice for a particular mode of governance was often motivated by ideology rather than by evidence-based analyses of ムwhat worksメ.

Tutorial

Tutorial 8

Tutorial Questions

* Which strategies can be used to secure behaviour change?
* Which strategies can be used to contain Covid-19?
* Is 'coercion' an effective way to secure behaviour change?
* Are 'incentives' a good way to secure behaviour change?
* Why is it so hard to secure lasting behaviour change?

Week 12

(19 May - 25 May)

Lecture

Thu 22/5 - Lecture 12 (Revision)

As we saw, there are different ways in which we can conceptualize and study political attitudes and behaviours. Some researchers attribute attitudes and behaviours to individual-differences (e.g., personality traits). Other researchers view political attitudes and behaviours as flowing from (individual-level) emotion and cognition effects. Yet other researchers look for answers in collective-level factors, such as culture, shared values, shared identity, and social norms. In this final lecture we will revisit each lecture topic and recall how each approach has contributed to a better understanding of the topic in question.

Not Timetabled

No tutorial in week 12

Policies and procedures

University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:

Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.