Skip to menu Skip to content Skip to footer
Course profile

Dynamics of Governance (POLS7101)

Study period
Sem 2 2024
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person

Course overview

Study period
Semester 2, 2024 (22/07/2024 - 18/11/2024)
Study level
Postgraduate Coursework
Location
St Lucia
Attendance mode
In Person
Units
2
Administrative campus
St Lucia
Coordinating unit
Politic Sc & Internat Studies

This course deals with the practices of modern governance. Governance can be defined as the tools, strategies and relationships used by governments to help govern. Interest in governance has in part been spurred by the view that governments should experiment more with 'non-governmental' mechanisms in dealing with pressing problems, for example, through the use of market mechanisms, or by forging collaborative or partnership relationships with civil society or community organisations. A central argument in this course, however, is that the role of governments and state agencies remains central to governance strategies, and that governments have an important responsibility to oversee, steer, resource and render accountable all forms of governance. This notion of the 'government of governance' can be termed 'metagovernance'.

The course also deals with questions of knowledge and rationality in policy and governance systems and about how ideas and discourses shape the world of policy and governance. The course also explores the impact of power and institutional arrangements in shaping governance practices.

Public policy can be defined as purposeful decision making by governments to activate a policy goal. Governance is somewhat similar but usually implies governments using a wider set of instruments and/or relationships (often with non-government actors) to achieve policy outcomes. Hence, governance is broader than public policy, implying a larger tool kit. In this course, we define governance as the tools, strategies and relationships used by governments to help govern.

Interest in governance has increased in the last decade or more as governments have searched for new ways of governing and dealing with problems which confront society. Interest in governance has in part been spurred by the view that governments should experiment more with ‘non-governmental’ mechanisms in dealing with pressing problems, for example, through the use of market mechanisms, or by forging collaborative or partnership relationships with civil society or community organisations.

Some have argued that governance strategies reflect a weakening state. For example, some scholars argue that the increased reliance on tools such as markets or relations with non-government organisations (eg. community associations or NGOs) implies a weakened state needing outside support.

A central argument in this course, however, is that the role of governments and state agencies remain central to most governance strategies. Indeed, the course argues that governments and state agencies remain central to governance and have an important responsibility to oversee, steer, resource and render accountable all forms of governance. This notion of the ‘government of governance’ can be described as ‘meta-governance’.

We also deal with questions of human capacity and rationality in policy and governance systems and also about how ideas and discourses shape the world of policy and governance. The course also explores the impact of power and institutional arrangements in shaping governance practices.

The course consists of a 1 hour lecture, and a 1 hour seminar that is designed to be highly interactive.

Course contact

Course staff

Lecturer

Timetable

The timetable for this course is available on the UQ Public Timetable.

Additional timetable information

Students are expected to attend all POLS7101 seminars in person.

The seminars will be held on UQ St Lucia campus, and be recorded so students unable to attend (e.g., due to illness) can view the recordings retrospectively.

The seminars will provide students with ample opportunity to meet with fellow students and to engage in group discussion.

Aims and outcomes

This course aims to provide an introduction to a number of key issues relating to contemporary debates about public policy and governance. In particular it is designed to provide an overview of key issues and to introduce ways of thinking about some of the more general, though fundamental, aspects of governance. We begin by looking briefly at public policy and then broadening out the focus to more general issues of governance.

Learning outcomes

After successfully completing this course you should be able to:

LO1.

understand and comment upon debates about the nature and limitations of governance

LO2.

understand the limits of various governance strategies whether markets, states or community engagement

LO3.

communicate and apply concepts and ideas to the study of a practical policy issue or problem

Assessment

Assessment summary

Category Assessment task Weight Due date
Participation/ Student contribution Weekly Attendance and Active Participation
  • In-person
15%

Seminars start on 25/07/2024 and end on 17/10/2024

Presentation Video Presentation
  • Identity Verified
15%

Due Friday 16/08/2024 at 2pm

Paper/ Report/ Annotation Minor Essay (1500 words) 20%

Due Wednesday 11/09/2024 at 2pm

Essay/ Critique Research Case Study (3000 words) 50%

Due Friday 25/10/2024 2pm

Assessment details

Weekly Attendance and Active Participation

  • In-person
Mode
Activity/ Performance
Category
Participation/ Student contribution
Weight
15%
Due date

Seminars start on 25/07/2024 and end on 17/10/2024

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03

Task description

Internal POLS7101 students:

  • Are expected to attend the weekly seminars in person.
  • Are expected to write a summary of one of the recommended readings for each week, and to hand in this summary to the course coordinator before the seminar starts.

Your participation mark will be based on attendance (6 points maximum), summary submissions (6 points maximum), and active participation in group discussion (3 points maximum).

Assessment tasks are intended to evaluate a student’s abilities, skills, and knowledge. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment instructions, assessments are to be completed without the aid of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Translation (MT). Failure to comply with this direction may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. 

Submission guidelines

Deferral or extension

You cannot defer or apply for an extension for this assessment.

Video Presentation

  • Identity Verified
Mode
Oral, Product/ Artefact/ Multimedia
Category
Presentation
Weight
15%
Due date

Due Friday 16/08/2024 at 2pm

Learning outcomes
L01

Task description

Record a short (ca 12 minute) video via Zoom, in which you:

  1. Start by stating your name and your country of origin (ca. 2 minutes)
  2. Reflect briefly (ca 5 minutes) on what you have learned so far from the POLS7101 seminars and course readings.
  3. Reflect briefly (ca 5 minutes) on an article you have read for the course (POLS7101) and summarise the article's key arguments and evidence.

Practical Tips

  • Prepare your recording by Zoom through your UQ-linked profile by selecting the ‘Record to the cloud’ option. After recording you will be emailed (or can access) a link to your recording. To submit your video presentation, paste the ‘share with others’ link to your recording into the submission link in Blackboard.
  • Prepare notes (minimally) or a script (maximally) before you deliver your presentation to camera. It is common for people to believe that they can simply ‘talk’ without having a plan or a script, but this rarely works well.
  • Do not aim for perfection. It can be tempting to try re-recording to eliminate errors, but it is natural that your video recording has some minor errors in it (you do not need to produce a newsreader or studio quality video).
  • Observe the video length limit (10% under or over is fine).

Assessment tasks are intended to evaluate a student’s abilities, skills, and knowledge. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment instructions, assessments are to be completed without the aid of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Translation (MT). Failure to comply with this direction may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. 

Submission guidelines

Submission:

Assignments for this course will be submitted electronically via Blackboard and using Turnitin.

In uploading an assignment via Turnitin you are certifying that it is your original work, that it has not been copied in whole or part from another person or source except where this is properly acknowledged, and that it has not in whole or part been previously submitted for assessment in any other course at this or any other university.

When you successfully submit your assessment to Turnitin after previewing the uploaded document (to make sure that you have chosen the correct file), you should see the “Submission Complete!” message. After this, a downloadable Digital Receipt will display on your Assignment Dashboard. It is your responsibility to download the Digital Receipt as proof of submission. Turnitin will not send this receipt to you automatically.

If you don’t see the downloadable receipt on your assignment dashboard, you should regard your submission as unsuccessful.

If the submission was not successful:

  1. Note the error message (preferably take a screenshot).
  2. Go to your assignment page and see if it is possible to submit again.
  3. If you cannot submit again, then email your course coordinator immediately.


Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Unless an extension is granted, penalties for late submission apply. Students are penalised 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item for every calendar day that an assessment item is late.

Marks will be deducted each day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point the submitted item will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is triggered from the time the submission is due.

Minor Essay (1500 words)

Mode
Written
Category
Paper/ Report/ Annotation
Weight
20%
Due date

Due Wednesday 11/09/2024 at 2pm

Learning outcomes
L01, L02

Task description

Write a 1500 word essay:

The topics for this essay will be posted onto Black-Board, and disseminated to students using a Black-Board announcement

Your essay should be submitted via Turnitin on the POLS7101 Blackboard site.

Required word count: 1500 words (excluding references), with 10% less or more margin.

Plagiarism and AI warning

  • Please note that your paper will be checked for originality via the Turnitin system. Breaches will be reported to the School's Integrity Officer for further investigation.
  • Assessment tasks are intended to evaluate a student’s abilities, skills, and knowledge. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment instructions, assessments are to be completed without the aid of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Translation (MT). Failure to comply with this direction may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. 

Submission guidelines

Submission:

Assignments for this course will be submitted electronically via Blackboard and using Turnitin.

In uploading an assignment via Turnitin you are certifying that it is your original work, that it has not been copied in whole or part from another person or source except where this is properly acknowledged, and that it has not in whole or part been previously submitted for assessment in any other course at this or any other university.

When you successfully submit your assessment to Turnitin after previewing the uploaded document (to make sure that you have chosen the correct file), you should see the “Submission Complete!” message. After this, a downloadable Digital Receipt will display on your Assignment Dashboard. It is your responsibility to download the Digital Receipt as proof of submission. Turnitin will not send this receipt to you automatically.

If you don’t see the downloadable receipt on your assignment dashboard, you should regard your submission as unsuccessful.

If the submission was not successful:

  1. Note the error message (preferably take a screenshot).
  2. Go to your assignment page and see if it is possible to submit again.
  3. If you cannot submit again, then email your course coordinator immediately.
Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Unless an extension is granted, penalties for late submission apply. Students are penalised 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item for every calendar day that an assessment item is late.

Marks will be deducted each day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point the submitted item will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is triggered from the time the submission is due.

Research Case Study (3000 words)

Mode
Written
Category
Essay/ Critique
Weight
50%
Due date

Due Friday 25/10/2024 2pm

Learning outcomes
L01, L02, L03

Task description

Research Case Study

Write an evidence-informed policy case study on a topic of your choice.

You are welcome to ask the course coordinator for advice when considering possible case study topics.

Choosing a topic (i.e., policy issue)

Consider focusing on a policy issue that you have a long-standing interest in and/or have personal or professional experience with (so you are more likely to remain motivated)

Choose a policy issue that has attracted considerable scholarly attention in recent years (so there is literature you can read, draw upon, and use to evaluate the chosen case)

You are welcome to choose a recent 'hot-topic', but keep in mind that this can be extra challenging, this because there may not be a scholarly literature yet on this hot-topic.

Your case study should be submitted via Turnitin on the POLS7101 Blackboard site.

Required word count: 3000 words (excluding references), with 10% less or more margin.

Plagiarism and AI warning

  • Please note that your case study will be checked for originality via the Turnitin system. Breaches will be reported to the School's Integrity Officer for further investigation.
  • Assessment tasks are intended to evaluate a student’s abilities, skills, and knowledge. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment instructions, assessments are to be completed without the aid of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Translation (MT). Failure to comply with this direction may constitute student misconduct under the Student Code of Conduct. 

Submission guidelines

Submission:

Assignments for this course will be submitted electronically via Blackboard and using Turnitin.

In uploading an assignment via Turnitin you are certifying that it is your original work, that it has not been copied in whole or part from another person or source except where this is properly acknowledged, and that it has not in whole or part been previously submitted for assessment in any other course at this or any other university.

When you successfully submit your assessment to Turnitin after previewing the uploaded document (to make sure that you have chosen the correct file), you should see the “Submission Complete!” message. After this, a downloadable Digital Receipt will display on your Assignment Dashboard. It is your responsibility to download the Digital Receipt as proof of submission. Turnitin will not send this receipt to you automatically.

If you don’t see the downloadable receipt on your assignment dashboard, you should regard your submission as unsuccessful.

If the submission was not successful:

  1. Note the error message (preferably take a screenshot).
  2. Go to your assignment page and see if it is possible to submit again.
  3. If you cannot submit again, then email your course coordinator immediately.
Deferral or extension

You may be able to apply for an extension.

Late submission

A penalty of 10% of the maximum possible mark will be deducted per 24 hours from time submission is due for up to 7 days. After 7 days, you will receive a mark of 0.

Unless an extension is granted, penalties for late submission apply. Students are penalised 10% of the maximum possible mark allocated for the assessment item for every calendar day that an assessment item is late.

Marks will be deducted each day for up to 7 calendar days, at which point the submitted item will not receive any marks unless an extension has been approved. Each 24-hour block is triggered from the time the submission is due.

Course grading

Full criteria for each grade is available in the Assessment Procedure.

Grade Description
1 (Low Fail)

Absence of evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student does not address the question, shows no evidence of reading and minimal comprehension of the issues at hand.

2 (Fail)

Minimal evidence of achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student addresses the question poorly and shows very little evidence of reading.

3 (Marginal Fail)

Demonstrated evidence of developing achievement of course learning outcomes

Course grade description: The student makes an effort to establish a single major argument for the essay or coherent answer for the exam question and employs some research which is correlated with the argument. Makes a visible effort to achieve adequate grammar, spelling and punctuation. Evidence of attempting to achieve a recognisable narrative flow appears throughout the assignment. The student addresses the question and shows evidence of required research and a basic grasp of the issues at hand. However, falls short of satisfying all basic requirements for a Pass.

4 (Pass)

Demonstrated evidence of functional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student makes a reasonable effort to provide evidence to support a visible argument and employs an adequate research base to support the argument or answer. Achieves a reasonable, if not completely coherent standard of grammar, spelling, and punctuation. A recognisable narrative flow is sustained throughout the essay. The student answers the question and shows evidence of adequate research and a degree of understanding of the issues at hand.

5 (Credit)

Demonstrated evidence of proficient achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student provides suitable evidence to support an argument and employs a comprehensive research base that directly relates to the topic, though it may not completely support the argument. Achieves decent levels of competence in grammar, spelling, punctuation and narrative flow. The student answers the question in a direct, well supported fashion and shows evidence of some wide reading and a reasonable understanding of the issues at hand.

6 (Distinction)

Demonstrated evidence of advanced achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student demonstrates a very good grasp of the chosen topic and provides a considerable amount of evidence to support a clearly stated argument. The student employs a reasonably extensive and well-organised research base to structure evidence in support of the argument and achieves a high level of competence in grammar, spelling, punctuation and narrative flow. The student answers the question in a direct, reasonably sophisticated fashion, employs wide research and shows a sound understanding of the issues at hand.

7 (High Distinction)

Demonstrated evidence of exceptional achievement of course learning outcomes.

Course grade description: The student demonstrates a highly sophisticated grasp of the topic and succeeds in addressing the question by providing a high level of evidence to support a clearly stated argument. The student employs an extensive and well organised research base to structure evidence in support of the argument and achieves impeccable levels of grammar, spelling, punctuation and narrative flow. The student answers the question in a direct and elegant fashion, employs significant research and shows a deep understanding of the issues at hand.

Additional course grading information

Grades will be awarded on the following basis:

1.ᅠFailᅠ 1 - 19%
2. Failᅠ 20 - 44%
3. Failᅠ 45 ヨ 49%
4. Passᅠ 50 - 64 %
5. Creditᅠ 65 - 74 %
6. Distinctionᅠ 75 - 84 %
7. High Distinctionᅠ 85 - 100 %

Supplementary assessment

Supplementary assessment is available for this course.

Additional assessment information

Students will receive written feedback on their assignments (in electronic format) via the Turnitin online submission system.

Note: Make sure that you keep a copy of your assignments.

Word Length Penalty

Unless otherwise indicated, in the case of written submissions with a specified word count, you are given a +10% leeway on the upper word limit. If your written submission is over this leeway limit, it will attract a 10 percentage point penalty. For example, if your essay is 1,500 words, you may write up to 1,650 before attracting a word count penalty. If your essay exceeds the upper word limit, it will attract a 10% word count penalty. Therefore, if your essay is worth 40 marks, you will lose 4 marks from your allotted grade. Unless specified, penalties only apply to exceeding the word length, not for failure to write a sufficient amount.

Referencing and Word-Length

• The Author-date in-text referencing system will count toward the word length;

• References in the Footnote referencing system will not count toward the word length.

• If you are using footnotes, any content included in footnotes beyond the specific text reference will count towards the word length.

Learning resources

You'll need the following resources to successfully complete the course. We've indicated below if you need a personal copy of the reading materials or your own item.

Library resources

Find the required and recommended resources for this course on the UQ Library website.

Additional learning resources information

The following books are also useful for background reading:ᅠ

Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2020). Public Policy: A New Introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Torfing, J., Andersen, L. B., Greve, C., & Klausen, K. K. (2020). Public Governance Paradigms: Competing and Co-existing. Edward Elgar Publishing.ᅠ

Essay Guide

The School of Political Science and International Studies Essay Guide can be downloaded from the School’s Student Support webpage.

The Guide sets out guidelines you should follow in preparing written assignments. 


Essay Writing Assistance

The School of Political Science and International Studies schedules regular “drop-in” sessions designed to provide one-on-one advice and assistance in essay planning and writing.

There is no need to make an appointment and you are encouraged to bring your essay with you. The day and time of these sessions will be determined at the start of each semester and published on the Student Support webpage.


Student Services

Student services offer a variety of short courses during the semester which will help you improve your study, research and writing skills and thus your academic performance in this course.


Library Resources

UQ Library offers training in software, assignment writing, research skills, and publishing and research management.

The University’s library holdings for Political Science and International Studies are primarily located in the Central Library.

There is a help desk in the Library. Students are also welcome to contact the BEL/HASS Librarians for assistance.

Email: librarians@library.uq.edu.au

Book a Librarian Appointment (BEL/HASS faculties)

Learning activities

The learning activities for this course are outlined below. Learn more about the learning outcomes that apply to this course.

Filter activity type by

Please select
Clear filters
Learning period Activity type Topic
Week 1

(22 Jul - 28 Jul)

Seminar

1. Introduction

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To explain/clarify the course aims and teaching methods
  • To identify (and reflect on) key concepts used in public policy research

Learning outcomes: L01

Week 2

(29 Jul - 04 Aug)

Seminar

2. 1970s Fiscal Crisis of Western Welfare States

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To familiarise students with the main historical turning points that brought about a change in thinking about how governments should govern.
  • To explain that the 1970s fiscal crisis of the Western Welfare State was one such turning point (resulting in growing enthusiasm for the idea of 'rolling back the frontiers of the state'

Learning outcomes: L01

Week 3

(05 Aug - 11 Aug)

Seminar

3. 1980s New Public Management (NPM)

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To understand why policy-makers in western countries began to rely less on 'state intervention', and more on 'private sector techniques'.
  • To examine the pros and cons of growing reliance on 'New Public Management' (NPM) literature, which advocated greater reliance on 'markets' and 'private sector techniques'.

Learning outcomes: L01

Week 4

(12 Aug - 18 Aug)

Seminar

4. 1990s Third-Way Politics and Policy

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To understand why left-wing parties in western societies felt compelled to compromise and 'move to the centre'.
  • To understand how this move to the centre led to the adoption of hybrid ('third-way') policy solutions, which incorporated elements of NPM

Learning outcomes: L01

Week 5

(19 Aug - 25 Aug)

Seminar

5. 2000s Globalisation and 'State Capacity Erosion'

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To understand the growing complexity of policy-making due to the rise of trans-national corporations (TNCs) and transnational international organisations (IOs)
  • To understand how 'globalisation' gradually constrained western countries' autonomy and state capacity (to adopt and implement 'home grown' policy solutions.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02

Week 6

(26 Aug - 01 Sep)

Seminar

6. Rethinking the 'Government to Governance' Narrative

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To understand the reasons why 'governance' scholars advanced the 'hollowing-out thesis' (thereby emphasising rapid state capacity erosion).
  • To understand the reasons why 'meta-governance' scholars denounced the hollowing-out thesis, arguing modern-day governance arrangement operate 'in the shadow of hierarchy'

Learning outcomes: L01, L02

Week 7

(02 Sep - 08 Sep)

Seminar

7. Combining (Five) 'Modes of Governance'

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To understand the different strategies policy-makers can use when seeking to secure policy objectives.
  • To gain a better understanding of how policy-makers can benefit from social science research into 'norm compliance' and 'behaviour change'.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03

Week 8

(09 Sep - 15 Sep)

Seminar

8. Governance through Hierarchy

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To understand the ongoing relevance of (hierarchical) top-down state intervention (despite growing governance complexity).
  • To understand the need to balance 'state intervention' and fostering 'free market activity' (and evaluate evidence suggesting a healthy balance can be a success formula).

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03

Week 9

(16 Sep - 22 Sep)

Seminar

9. Governance through Markets

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To appreciate the pros and cons of policies that seek to harness competitive market forces
  • To learn (from real-world examples) that experiments in 'governance through markets' can fail due to unanticipated consequences, such as the creation of perverse incentives.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03

Mid Sem break

(23 Sep - 29 Sep)

No student involvement (Breaks, information)

MID-SEMESTER BREAK


Learning outcomes: L01

Week 10

(30 Sep - 06 Oct)

Seminar

10. Governance through (MLG) Networks

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To appreciate the pros and cons of efforts to devolve policy making downwards to (partially) 'self-governing networks'
  • To learn (from real-world examples) that 'governance through networks' tends to work better when government retains a considerable degree of ('meta-governance') oversight.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03

Week 11

(07 Oct - 13 Oct)

Seminar

11. Governance by Stealth

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To understand why, in recent years, policy-makers have become interested in cognition psychology and 'behavioural insights' (into 'automatic pilot behaviour')
  • To learn (from real-world examples) how these insights have been used to steer the behaviour of citizens covertly, by changing the 'choice architecture' around them.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03

Week 12

(14 Oct - 20 Oct)

Seminar

12. Governance through Persuasion

The learning objectives of this seminar are:

  • To appreciate the many ways in which policy-makers have used 'social marketing' to steer citizens' behaviour and to secure policy objectives.
  • To enhance our understanding of why some social marketing campaigns appear to work, while other social marketing campaigns fail and lead to so-called 'reactance backlash'.

Learning outcomes: L01, L02, L03

Policies and procedures

University policies and procedures apply to all aspects of student life. As a UQ student, you must comply with University-wide and program-specific requirements, including the:

Learn more about UQ policies on my.UQ and the Policy and Procedure Library.